Jump to content

Qualcomm debuts 802.11ac on it new chip = faster WiFi


legion125

Recommended Posts

You've probably read how the carriers want to offload traffic from the network onto WiFi. Now Qualcomm will make the experience more pleasant. Qualcomm has tested VoLTE and graphic inerface on its S4 chip and now its integrating the new WiFi chip onto the S4. This is a refinement from the old standard and will utilize less crowded airwaves. So when the carries kick you off the network, just enjoy fast speeds at home or at your local hotspot.

 

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Qualcomm-bringing-super-fast-WiFi-to-mobile-devices_id27210

 

 

 

 

Qualcomm bringing super fast WiFi to mobile devices

 

Over the past few weeks, we've seen some impressive things from Qualcomm, or actually, we've seen the Snapdragon S4 a number of times, but each time it's just as impressive as the last. First, we saw the S4's graphical benchmarks, then VoLTE on the S4, and finally more benchmarks of the S4. Now, we're learning that it won't just be the GPU and CPU that will be speedy on the S4, but the WiFi as well.

It turns out that Qualcomm is integrating a combo WiFi/Bluetooth/FM chip to the Snapdragon S4 and other 28nm Snapdragon chips. The WiFi in that combo will be 802.11ac, which is a refinement of the 802.11n standard that runs only on the 5GHz spectrum band and not the extremely crowded 2.4GHz spectrum. This means WiFi data speeds up to a theoretical max of just under 500Mbps on a single link, but given the right setup, it could offer speeds much faster.

We'll have to see what kind of real world speeds it gets, and we'll likely get some demos at MWC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even 802.11n is overkill for phones. Most phones only support 1x1 sgi40 on a 20mhz channel. Which means the fastest handshake is 65 megabits while your laptop is connected at 300 megabits on 40 mhz channel. If of course your router and wireless card are set to use 40mhz which most routers are not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even 802.11n is overkill for phones. Most phones only support 1x1 sgi40 on a 20mhz channel. Which means the fastest handshake is 65 megabits while your laptop is connected at 300 megabits on 40 mhz channel. If of course your router and wireless card are set to use 40mhz which most routers are not.

 

Mine is set at 40MHz on both my N at 2.4GHz and my N at 5GHz. It's 20MHz on my G. I have a NAS that I use to store music and video. I keep it at 40MHz so I can easily stream from my NAS everywhere in the house, to TV's, laptops and smartphones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...