Jump to content

AT&T talking to LEAP in last ditch effort to sell T-Mo's assets.


Recommended Posts

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 29 November 2011


I think this is AT&T's last best chance for success. I would guess that if this doesn't work then the merger is done I think to make this happen both AT&T and DT will be doing some heavy financing and offering extremely friendly terms to LEAP.









Report: AT&T 'knee-deep' in talks to sell T-Mobile assets to Leap


November 29, 2011 — 10:14am ET | By Phil Goldstein



AT&T (NYSE:T) is "knee-deep" in last-ditch talks with Cricket provider Leap Wireless (

NASDAQ:LEAP) to sell Leap substantial assets of T-Mobile USA in a bid to keep AT&T's $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile afloat, according to a report in the New York Times.


The report, which cited unnamed sources familiar with the matter, said AT&T hopes such a deal would calm concerns at the Department of Justice, which has sued to block the deal on antitrust grounds. The report said such a sale would make Leap the fourth-largest wireless carrier in the country but would still leave AT&T with enough of T-Mobile's spectrum to make the deal worthwhile.


Leap spokesman Greg Lund declined to comment on the report, and an AT&T spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


For Leap to become the fourth-largest wireless carrier by subscribers, AT&T would have to sell Leap at least 40 percent, if not more, of T-Mobile's subscribers and spectrum, a figure that has been discussed in previous reports. T-Mobile ended the third quarter with 33.7 million subscribers, while Leap ended the period with around 5.8 million total customers. Leap's larger prepaid rival



(NASDAQ:PCS) counted over 9.1 million subscribers at the end of the third quarter.


The Times article described AT&T's attempts to sell to Leap as a "Hail Mary pass," and indeed it seems that AT&T's options to offload T-Mobile assets through divestitures are dwindling. Leap has around $800 million in cash and short-term investments, compared with $2.1 billion for MetroPCS. According to a Bloomberg report, which also cited unnamed sources, MetroPCS is not interested in buying T-Mobile customers and spectrum in as many markets as AT&T needs to sell.


Last week AT&T said it withdrew its application for the T-Mobile acquisition from the FCC so that it could concentrate on it legal battle with the Department of Justice. That trial is set to begin Feb. 13. U.S. District Judge Ellen Huvelle, who is overseeing the case, postponed a hearing in the case set for Wednesday until Dec. 9 "due to the court's scheduling conflict."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 29 November 2011


I think this is ridiculous. It's a desperate move by AT&T. I don't see how the FCC can find that the merger would make the wireless market uncompetitive in 99 of the top 100 markets in the U.S., but a 40% divestiture will satisfy the Feds. It won't be enough. They will just run the same competitive scenario numbers again and will find that even with a 40% divestiture the merger will make the wireless market uncompetitive in 90 in the top 100 markets.


40% is too small. Verizon had to part with almost 40% of Alltel to satisfy the Feds back in 2008. And Alltel wasn't even half the size of T-Mobile. And the market was much more diverse and competitve then.


I just don't see AT&T getting there myself. And I'm glad for it!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 29 November 2011


Yeah...there are not many wireless co's out there that are smaller than Verizon, but big enough to buy a sizeable portion of Tmo. Especially given today;s current economic environment. AT&T does not have a lot of divestiture partners that it can count on to help them out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 30 November 2011


With Metro PCS, AT&T had a chance to make this work since Metro PCS is sitting on gobs of money. Alas, they only wanted enough spectrum to expand in markets according to its business plan. Which means Metro doesn't want to be a national player. I have no clue what Leap wants to be. Maybe they want spectrum, but I don't see how they would pay for it. They only have a fourth of the capital that Metro has. If somehow they pull this off with its current model, the customer defections would be stupendous unless they think they can metamorphous into a national player overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 2 December 2011


I think based on this article that AT&T will do a joint venture with T-Mobile if/when the court case falls through. This will be a win/win for T-mo, its customers and consumers. T-mobile would have a good chance or staying profitable and gain customers and be able to offer LTE, and AT&T would gain the spectrum it desires.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I see it as more of an economic calculation.  Basically go after the areas where they have the best odds of retaining or attracting customers versus their MVNO arrangements. The quicker they can switch back and forth between 5g and MVNOs the finer grained this decision zone can be.  Field results will beat theory.  In Sprint days this was up to 15 minutes in theory. In practice AT&T could be quite sticky.  I remember driving by 3 Sprint sites while still stuck on AT&T roaming. Dish will need to do better to thrive. Both their MVNO arrangements reportedly now cost them about $1.50 per GB. With volume that may fall to $1.
    • Man I wish I could get on their beta right now.  Looks like I'll have to wait until Dec or so.  The report is not surprising really.  Largely only have employees roaming around running tests and what not.  I am sure lots of testing is needed to iron out bugs, fix things.  Though a lot of it might be denser network.  Only so much you can do and money is spread out very thin when you have such a large target to hit. 
    • Found some AT&T c band live in Cincinnati today. Not too bad considering I was driving past on the interstate at speed.  
    • Hey Mike, a couple other things you might be able to post for S22Ultra owners, In particular, these deal with the *#0011# menu. The following are true for even the June update:   1. Does not show the second n41 carrier (when it is connected) on LTE+NSA. It shows "NR_NumCC:2" but no additional Carrier. It simply states "CA-Not Config 0 0"This works fine on the S21.  2. There is a line that states "Code Review Required" 3. There is a line that states "Unknown 0"    
    • The see Dish as the Beta network for a while. Basically once they have secured their licenses and have inexpensive phones that utilize all their bands I hope to see them reduce the edge space of their network or improve the transfer performance so customers have more of an invisible handoff experience. This will likely be late 2023. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...