Jump to content

AT&T in the hunt for Leap Wireless


legion125

Recommended Posts

That pesky AT&T. The grave of the T-Mobile merger isn't even cold yet and its going after Cricket. This one may pass FCC muster.

 

http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/16/2801647/at-t-leap-wireless-purchase-spectrum

 

AT&T pursuing Leap Wireless purchase for its spectrum?

 

AT&T has made no bones about its need for more wireless spectrum, and now that it can't acquire T-Mobile, it's considering a myriad of options to fill in the gaps. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the company is in the midst of talks with Leap Wireless, which owns the more well-known brand Cricket, saying that the two sides "have been engaged in talks about a potential deal." The talks are apparently the result of a rapport the two companies built up when AT&T was considering selling Leap some spectrum to make the T-Mobile acquisition more palatable. Though any potential deal is reportedly months away, it could remove out one of the more successful smaller carriers from the marketplace.

 

It's no surprise that AT&T is looking at all options, including possible deals with MetroPCS and even Dish Network, which recently tussled with AT&T in FCC filings over its own wireless plans. Dish might not be interested in selling, the WSJ reports, and MetroPCS is also apparently not looking like a likely partner.

 

While AT&T's spectrum crunch is a problem, it has to be said that the company is still managing to roll out LTE fairly well in the short term. Compared to T-Mobile (which has yet to detail any clear LTE plans) and Sprint (which has to now manage without LightSquared's network), the situation could certainly be worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They sure aren't giving up, are they? Greedy bastards.

 

AT&T just can't get past the Whitacre model of business. I would rather see them invest in their own network and try to reverse their industry lagging customer satisfaction.

 

Oh what do I know, I'm just a mindless amateur. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When SBC announced that they were acquiring AT&T, i said to my friend that SBC's next target was going to be Bell South so that they could consolidate Cingular into their fold. I said that about 6 months before at&t inc announced the Bell South purchase. I knew then that they were trying to re-monopolize. I guess I was right. :( Hopefully the FCC won't let this go through either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One good thing that would come of an AT&T buyout of Leap is the instant closure of all these low rent store front Cricket stores and shabby kiosk's you see. Not to disparage the needy, but you can count on standing room only at Cricket on the 1st & 15th when the government checks come it. These places are so small and shady looking and look like a fire hazard. An AT&T buyout would be a public service.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One good thing that would come of an AT&T buyout of Leap is the instant closure of all these low rent store front Cricket stores and shabby kiosk's you see. Not to disparage the needy' date=' but you can count on standing room only at Cricket on the 1st & 15th when the government checks come it. These places are so small and shady looking and look like a fire hazard. An AT&T buyout would be a public service.[/quote']

 

I know exactly what you're talking about. The Cricket store here in our small town looks like a crack house with a hand painted sign. Even the Mexican Money Wiring office looks like a Taj Mahal in comparison.

 

S4GRU is now mobile...posted via Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your talking Vegas baby! Everything is glitter & gold!

 

How wrong you are about Vegas. Only so much of it is glitter and gold, and the rest is bad. Gangs, drugs, homeless numbers on the rise faster than a casino implosion. I've seen it all. I've lived in Nevada since '90, the first 6 years were in Vegas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's some info about Leaps 4th quarter results. Although AT&T has gobs of money, and Leap will be cheaper than T-Mo, they still won't get a discount. Plus, I forgot that LEAP signed an MVNO agreement with Sprint several years ago so Cricket could have a nationwide presence. This could be somewhat troublesome down the road for Sprint if Leap is bought out. Knowing Sprints unquenchable thirst for revenue to pay Apple and NV, I wonder if there is any hand wringing in Overland Park?

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/leap-adds-179k-customers-q4-lte-rollout-remains-track/2012-02-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just revisiting the RCS issue and discussing another point I find odd.  Yeah, my family and close friends and most coworkers still mostly use whats app in our chats due to the odd RCS issues.   Some have Apple phones, some Samsung.  But using Facebook Messenger or Whats App handily eliminates those issues.   But the other thing I find odd is how all the information out there states that to use the Smart View app to mirror your phone to your TV that your TV and your phone have to be on the same wifi network.  That is 100 percent untrue.  I've historically not had wifi at home and only use it in our common areas in our community or occasionally at work.  But primarily I just use my phone for everything and do not have wifi at home.  It's because I haven't needed it.  I've been using all my Samsung phones for the better part of a decade now as my entertainment center because it's simple, effective, portable and absolutely does not require a wifi connection for my TV in order to cast all the content from my phone.  I'm not sure why it is stated that it is required.  The two devices - as we all no doubt know - create a wifi direct connection between the two devices in order for smart view to work, however, no general wifi network is required at all.  Again, I've been enjoying the feature for close to a decade but I find it odd that they say that you need wifi at home to use it.  Samsung television sets, Roku TV sets, LG TV sets (I cast to all of them at work regularly, again, sans wifi) and TCL TVs are all compatible.  There are likely more but these are the ones that I regularly screen mirror to, again, without the two devices being on the same network (this is separate from the notion of creating a wifi direct connection between the 2 in order to enable the service). This is the sole reason I only buy Samsung phones.   I tried a Pixel device before the Pixel 8 (which was the first to allow display out via wired connection for streaming) but it simply did not offer the same feature.   I wonder why they say this.  It's interesting if nothing else.  
    • Yeah, I probably see it through a Washington/Oregon market lens. And maybe a little Nebraska too.  These are the only places I have monitored Tmo overlay of USC closely. Tmo has already added service on 80% of the same towers that were unique to USC just 5 years ago around here.  The 20% left are either too close to an existing Tmo site, or, probably already on Tmo's plans to collocation.  But there is one USC site on the beach where our family likes to go that I am dying for Tmo to add service.  There won't be a lot of new coverage added here. But I have not done really any review in other USC areas.  But I definitely think it's a good move. Robert
    • Found Ericsson C-band+DoD in Brooklyn. What tipped me off was when I mapped a new eNB in this area on Halloween but I didn't see any permits for a new site in the area and the sectors I mapped matched the existing site that was there. Drove by it today and sure enough it's an Ericsson C-band + DoD site, likely one of the first in the city.  This is eNB 110340, formerly eNB 115257. — — — — — Also a T-Mobile new build in Queens. The permit for this one was submitted last year as a replacement for another monopole that got demolished nearby. It must've only recently got installed because it was offline when I drove by it.
    • Here’s What to Do If You’re Still Paying a Monthly Sprint Flex Lease Charge  Not sure this applies to anyone here but if it does ...
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...