Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Columbus Market


abrcrmdl23

Recommended Posts

Peeps I just found out A LOT and I do mean a lot of information (including back-haul) about the Columbus Market as a whole. Let me find out how much of it I can share and I'll surely pass it on if allowed to.

Whatever u can post, without sources is good for me...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peeps I just found out A LOT and I do mean a lot of information (including back-haul) about the Columbus Market as a whole. Let me find out how much of it I can share and I'll surely pass it on if allowed to.

Good news I hope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright folks. I've got to keep the hush hush on a lot, but let me share just a tiny bit.

 

Microwave back-haul doesn't appear it will be daisy-chained in the NV rollouts. The microwave received from another site will be directly connected to the network on it's own dedicated line, instead of through other microwave sites or even through the site it's coming from.

 

We still need a lot of backhaul. A LOT.

 

The last is obvious, but the Clearwire spectrum is going to be where Sprint becomes king!

 

Sorry couldn't get into more, but gotta protect the source.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright folks. I've got to keep the hush hush on a lot, but let me share just a tiny bit.

 

Microwave back-haul doesn't appear it will be daisy-chained in the NV rollouts. The microwave received from another site will be directly connected to the network on it's own dedicated line, instead of through other microwave sites or even through the site it's coming from.

 

We still need a lot of backhaul. A LOT.

 

The last is obvious, but the Clearwire spectrum is going to be where Sprint becomes king!

 

Sorry couldn't get into more, but gotta protect the source.

 

This only corrobarates the sentiment that alot of sites are near ready & awaiting the backhaul .. Can't go far without that..

 

Any info on how far along backhaul is in Columbus ?

 

Remember this post??  :

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thenight84, on 20 Jul 2013 - 11:34 PM, said:snapback.png

Ill keep it short.

26 3G towers on 1900mhz,

14 on 800mhz.

78 confirmed dates for ethernet delivery.

16 sites live with ethernet.

 

97 sites with construction complete awaiting backhaul.

 

281 sites with construction begun.

equipment has been delivered to 144 sites.

And only 96 sites still needing approval to begin work.

Have a good evening S4GRU nerds :tu: .....Oh and IMEX..standby for some LTE

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1904-network-visionlte-columbus-market/page-62

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhmmmmmm yeah but uhhhhhh.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spill the beans! Haha

 

Backhaul being behind is obvious, though.

Well Columbus is ahead of schedule concerning NV in general.

 

The problem is we have it before we're supposed to, so we now want it now. HELL even I do.

 

We all have the AT&T problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnA3C9Af_oc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

 

Sorry for the folks that liked my other two post. It was ridiculous to have 3 separate post so I combined them.

 

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any news about sites around the Lincoln village / Galloway area? Took a trip to Grove city today and it's got me hungry for LTE.

You could go look.... ;) seriously. I think the only news we get is when a tower's been accepted which causes some frenzy and a strong desire to bath ourselves in LTE waves. The best thing anyone can do right now is report when they see towers being worked on, like new base stations or new antenna's or fiber optic ground work being run to sites. Other than that it's sit back and wait. 

 

I don't recall reading much of anything about the west side, Galloway, Hilliard, Urbancrest. I went driving out through Hilltop looking for sites in progress to find there are no Sprint sites in a lot of that area, well two. There's some posts on what to look for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seen a climber going up the tower on stelzer and 5th ave. don't know if its Sprints but someone is getting something done

 

The tower directly at Stelzer & 5th is for another carrier unfortunately. Probably VZW and they're doing additional upgrades in Central Ohio.

 

Any news about sites around the Lincoln village / Galloway area? Took a trip to Grove city today and it's got me hungry for LTE.

 

As amcferrin90 said, getting out will help to see any additional progress, but NV equipment has been delivered in the area. There are sites in West Jeff. that have been upgraded. Just no LTE yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any chance you could post another coded update (10-10-100)?  All the information we have is no LTE sites until November :(

 

Don't want to speak for 'thenight84' but I don't think there has been additional movements since that last post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attention: Just speculation.

 

It appears the team that was working in Granville has just finished up in Johnstown. My guess is they're going to New Albany or Sunbury next. I'm thinking inside the outerbelt is scheduled further out than 30 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attention: Just speculation.

 

It appears the team that was working in Granville has just finished up in Johnstown. My guess is they're going to New Albany or Sunbury next. I'm thinking the interbelt is scheduled further out than 30 days.

Makes since to me...

 

I've never had calls drops but my wife(iPhone 5) and I(evo LTE) drops calls everytime if talking while driving on 161 just east of 310, could being upgrades causing the issue and it's a new(reported) drop call issue we've been having.

 

Now let's just get that backhaul and turn Granville and Johnstown on.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also looking as if a site is not 3G accepted already as of today, it will not be activated with LTE by the end of 2013. There will be a good amount of LTE but will not be a benefit to inside the outerbelt. Don't give up your WiFi yet Columbus. :wall:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also looking as if a site is not 3G accepted already as of today, it will not be activated with LTE by the end of 2013. There will be a good amount of LTE but will not be a benefit to inside the outerbelt. Don't give up your WiFi yet Columbus. :wall:

Thankfully I'm not inside the outerbelt. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also looking as if a site is not 3G accepted already as of today, it will not be activated with LTE by the end of 2013. There will be a good amount of LTE but will not be a benefit to inside the outerbelt. Don't give up your WiFi yet Columbus. :wall:

Ouch... Three more months, I would have expected more movement.  Oh well, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also looking as if a site is not 3G accepted already as of today, it will not be activated with LTE by the end of 2013. There will be a good amount of LTE but will not be a benefit to inside the outerbelt. Don't give up your WiFi yet Columbus. :wall:

 

So, looking like if it's in progress now, no lte this year?

 

If that's true, huge disappointment.... Now sure if myself and others will stick with sprint during this slow and long process. I have so many spots where my voice is horrible and data is horrible almost everywhere but it the Genoa Township area at one of my work locations.

 

Just a frustrated customer that wants some improvement...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully I'm not inside the outerbelt. :)

 

Again this is all speculation, but I'd include E/SE of Morse/270 in that equation of waiting as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, looking like if it's in progress now, no lte this year?

 

If that's true, huge disappointment.... Now sure if myself and others will stick with sprint during this slow and long process. I have so many spots where my voice is horrible and data is horrible almost everywhere but it the Genoa Township area at one of my work locations.

 

Just a frustrated customer that wants some improvement...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

Straight killed my enthusiasm!! Hope this is one of those under promised over delivered things

Believe me, I understand. The argument from the other side of the coin will be, "well, we gave you something prior than expected, so chill".

 

Alright, so, even though LTE is looking bleak, it still looks like NV 3G will be picking up. Probably 3/4 done by EOY. Don't know if that will include 800, but progress that's needed.

 

ALSO: There are still legacy capacity upgrades being made along side NV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly can live with the slow data speeds as long as the NV upgrades happen. I've lived with the slow speeds this long... another few months won't kill me, especially if the wait is worth it. I travel a lot and have experienced cities with NV upgrades with LTE included. If ours turns out like those cities, it will be worth the wait for sure.

 

And honestly, you can't really beat the value you get when it comes to Sprint's phone/data plans.

 

I know you all hate to hear this because I hate it as well but let's all be a little more patient. I'm sure once everything is all said and done, we will all be thankful we waited it out!

 

Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...