Jump to content

AT&T divests spectrum, now buys it back

WiWavelength

By WiWavelength
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

In the Cingular-AT&TWS merger FCC consent agreement in 2004, Cingular (which is the current AT&T) was required to divest assets in certain markets to satisfy competition concerns. In several markets in Arkansas, Cingular divested PCS 1900 MHz spectrum to NEATT. In the interim eight years, NEATT tried to make a go of it but failed. So, for the past two years, NEATT has been shopping its spectrum licenses to potential buyers. The only buyer that stepped up was AT&T.

 

http://transition.fc...FCC-12-84A1.pdf

 

Folks, this situation is the proverbial canary in the coal mine. The domestic wireless industry is snowballing toward both duopoly and duopsony. VZW and AT&T may end up not just the only sellers of wireless service but also the only buyers of wireless capacity. If so, our only hope as consumers may be strict regulation.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Seems no one else was interested in buying, the only other option was to return it back to the FCC.

Not much of a choice for NEATT.

 

Yes, and that is the point. A healthy market has an abundance of both buyers and sellers. If not, then we may need to realize that the wireless industry is not healthy -- or is simply not a market, hence requires regulation as a necessary utility.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jefbal99 Member Level: LTE Advanced

jefbal99

Posted
Posted

Wireless has replaced POTS as the standard for voice communication, it is time for the regulators to step up and ensure the consumer is not being screwed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • dkyeager
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • dkyeager
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • S4GRU
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By S4GRU · Posted

      Nissan Coupe
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...