Jump to content

Why does Phone connect to a tower further away


Recommended Posts

Does anyone know why a phone chooses one tower over another?

 

A handset is programmed to idle on/connect to the site with the most favorable signal level, and that may not be the closest site. Additionally, the handset is programmed to seek the highest protocol revision (e.g. LTE > EV-DO) that it supports. For example, the closest site may not yet have LTE deployed, but the LTE signal from a more distant site is usable. Finally, keep in mind that CDMA1X, EV-DO, and LTE signals are all tracked independently, so a handset can idle on/connect to different sites for the different airlinks all simultaneously.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats good info thanks. I actually visted one of the sites a mile from my job that is due to be a NV upgrade. Its only a mile away but lord know based on my covereage at my job I have never connected there. Do you know any other Apps like Opensignal that I can use to compare?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats good info thanks. I actually visted one of the sites a mile from my job that is due to be a NV upgrade. Its only a mile away but lord know based on my covereage at my job I have never connected there. Do you know any other Apps like Opensignal that I can use to compare?

 

Try CDMA Field Test. Open SIgnal's tower locations are inaccurate guesswork based on crowdsourcing.

 

One caveat: The tower coordinates captured by CDMA Field Test and similar apps will be the lat/lon broadcast by the sector base stations and captured by the Android device. But there seem to be two distinct situations: On some towers, all sector base stations will squawk the actual coordinates of the tower; on others, each sector will squawk different coordinates that are offest some distance away from the tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A handset is programmed to idle on/connect to the site with the most favorable signal level, and that may not be the closest site. Additionally, the handset is programmed to seek the highest protocol revision (e.g. LTE > EV-DO) that it supports. For example, the closest site may not yet have LTE deployed, but the LTE signal from a more distant site is usable. Finally, keep in mind that CDMA1X, EV-DO, and LTE signals are all tracked independently, so a handset can idle on/connect to different sites for the different airlinks all simultaneously.

 

AJ

 

I was thinking this while I was at home depot this morning. So its possible for a device to get an lte signal from one tower but voice on another at the same time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking this while I was at home depot this morning. So its possible for a device to get an lte signal from one tower but voice on another at the same time?

 

And be using both signals. Meaning I'm on a call and refreshing Twitter at the same time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So its possible for a device to get an lte signal from one tower but voice on another at the same time?

 

Absolutely. Different sectors on the same site or even different sites altogether. And this has long been true of CDMA1X and EV-DO, too.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And be using both signals. Meaning I'm on a call and refreshing Twitter at the same time

 

Voice and data simultaneously is a given, that I already know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. And this has long been true of CDMA1X and EV-DO, too.

 

AJ

 

Oh ok, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...