Jump to content

Are phones too expensive?


Feech

Recommended Posts

Not to say one is better than the other (I have both) and to avoid an OS debate there seems to be more information on Apples cost than others.

 

"IF" (according to Google searches) it cost Apple around 200.00 to make an iPhone 5, does the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Optimus G have anything that would justify a much bigger cost?

 

Doesn't Foxconn make handsets for various vendors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to say one is better than the other (I have both) and to avoid an OS debate there seems to be more information on Apples cost than others.

 

"IF" (according to Google searches) it cost Apple around 200.00 to make an iPhone 5, does the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Optimus G have anything that would justify a much bigger cost?

 

Doesn't Foxconn make handsets for various vendors?

 

They have less of an economy of scale than Apple, but they are gouging the consumer as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to say one is better than the other (I have both) and to avoid an OS debate there seems to be more information on Apples cost than others.

 

"IF" (according to Google searches) it cost Apple around 200.00 to make an iPhone 5, does the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Optimus G have anything that would justify a much bigger cost?

 

Doesn't Foxconn make handsets for various vendors?

 

Thank you, someone who got the point. It wasn't about Apple, it's just the easiest data to pull from.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Nexus 7 Specs

7" 1280x800 HD display (216 ppi)

Back-lit IPS display

Scratch-resistant Corning® glass

NVIDIA® Tegra® 3 quad-core processor

16 GB internal storage

$200

 

EVO LTE

720 x 1280 pixels 312 ppi

Dual core, 1500 MHz

16 GB

$549

 

I don't see that much of a hardware difference to justify a $350 dollar difference. Nobody said it was cheap to build a device at the same time at some point making a device should become cheaper over time.

 

Nexus 7 has no cellular chipset, much cheaper screen, and doesn't have to fit in your pocket.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nexus 7 has no cellular chipset...

 

Incorrect. The cellular chipset option increases the price only $50.

 

https://play.google.com/store/devices/details?id=nexus_7_32gb_hspa_tmo

https://play.google.com/store/devices/details?id=nexus_7_32gb_hspa_att

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Nexus 7 has no cellular chipset, much cheaper screen, and doesn't have to fit in your pocket.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

The wireless network capability would only cost 30 dollars or less to add to the Nexus 7 from the manufacturer. That is not really an argument. The cheaper screen is too small extent, but for only another 30 or 40 dollars. And the larger device is more expensive in some ways too.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, we will even go with a AJ's $50 price point. It is still not even close. There is a crap load full of markup on these things. No doubt. And if subsidies were scrapped and people knew what they paid for devices, prices would come down. Period.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, we will even go with a AJ's $50 price point. It is still not even close. There is a crap load full of markup on these things. No doubt. And if subsidies were scrapped and people knew what they paid for devices, prices would come down. Period.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

That probably is true since it would fire off direct competition and force manufacturing to trim the fat.

 

Still, lots of people like to act like we should get these at cost. Why would they continue to make them on a break even scale?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more thing to note.

 

A lot of the tablets are riding on the coattails of the r&d from the phones. There is significant cost in development that is built into the price structure of the phones. It all costs money someplace.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more thing to note.

 

A lot of the tablets are riding on the coattails of the r&d from the phones. There is significant cost in development that is built into the price structure of the phones. It all costs money someplace.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

They are not lining R&D with these margins. They are lining shareholders pockets. And I'm OK with a profit margin. But they need to compete for it. Right now, they are getting unfair hand over fist. And we are paying for it. Those subsidy costs are burdened by consumers.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if Google can fix their supply chain and get devices in front of average consumers, and we may see the competition after all

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

This is our best hope at the moment. And possibly Amazon too.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have less of an economy of scale than Apple, but they are gouging the consumer as well.

 

Isn't the S3 outselling the iPhone? I'd have to think Samsung has some clout as well.

 

The S3 is 549.00 on Sprints website. 599.99 on Verizon and 599.99 on T-Mobile. Still a rather expensive device looking at full retail.

 

The disparity of a phones value gets even murkier here:

 

Samsung Victory is 399.99 MSRP on Sprint postpaid but 249.99 on its pay as you go offering.

 

Optimus Elite is 249.99 on Sprint Postpaid but yet 149.99 on its new pay as you go offering and even cheaper @ 129.99 on Virgin Mobile. Same phone, same carrier, 3 different prices.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Isn't the S3 outselling the iPhone? I'd have to think Samsung has some clout as well.

 

 

Now, yes, but for the past few years the iPhone has tromped everyone else. Apple's disruption of supply chains is well documented and their economies of scale push foxconn and other suppliers to razor thin margins on the components. Samsung will be able to command that kind of economy of scale on the GS4 but did not have the ability to place that kind of order previously.

 

The GS3 did outsell the iPhone 5 in Q3 2012 and I will be interested to see the numbers for Q4 as many think the iPhone will reemerge as the top seller. Heck, for the first time I have ever seen, the newest model of the iPhone has been discounted. Apple is watching their market dominance slip through their tightly clenched fingers.

 

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to know where they are selling those puppies.. I've seen like one on the "street" since they launched. AT&T is selling the hell out of GS3's around here.
I saw one person at work with one. Then again I have seen more blackberries at work than iPhone 5s...

 

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apple is watching their market dominance slip through their tightly clenched fingers.

 

Is it just the fingers that Apple has tightly clenched?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been thinking about this for years and even more recently but what do you guys think of the price of phones that are off contract? Are they too expensive compared to what goes into them.

 

I look at the price of the iPhone 4S then the price of the iPod Touch of similar hardware and I notice a major discrepancy in pricing. This is purely a profit grab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The carriers take it on the chin with the iPhone more than the subsidized customer does.

 

They don't always know (or care) that you might get more for your 200.00 by getting an Optimus G or S3.

 

I'd be willing to bet a Windows phone or even the new Blackberry would be 199.99 out the door with a 2 yr. commitment.

 

 

 

 

Sent using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...