Jump to content

S4GRU Teaser Discussion


Sgt. Slaughter

Recommended Posts

After reading the second point, I'm left with the impression that sprint doesn't really like S4GRU... Do they?

 

Tolerated, but not liked.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tolerated, but not liked.

 

Robert

 

But your advertising for them in a way. Based on the sites morals, nothing but positive can come of this site. Would think that most of any users after a few minute on here, leave more of a believer and more loyal to Sprint. How do you know its not liked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But your advertising for them in a way. Based on the sites morals, nothing but positive can come of this site. Would think that most of any users after a few minute on here, leave more of a believer and more loyal to Sprint. How do you know its not liked?

 

Based on my communications with Sprint employees in official and non official capacities.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Based on my communications with Sprint employees in official and non official capacities.

 

Robert

 

I know it doesn't help you in any way but if it had not been for this site I would have already cancelled my new sprint account and that would have resulted in the loss of other subscribers (family) that I brought in from AT&T as well

 

I had good service when I had sprint a few years ago but in 2013 my data speeds are appalling. The info from you has kept me a sprint customer as my location has just started to become in progress. Without this site, I would still be in the dark and gone from sprint by now.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on my communications with Sprint employees in official and non official capacities.

 

Robert

 

If that's true, then that would definitely explain the underlying reasons why Sprint seems to always be lacking in terms of PR and marketing/advertising approaches. A different mindset and approach could make a world of difference to my way of thinking.

 

Granted, I'm coming from a consumer mindset completely and certainly not a business/profit one, so I'm sure I'm probably just missing a point somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it doesn't help you in any way but if it had not been for this site I would have already cancelled my new sprint account and that would have resulted in the loss of other subscribers (family) that I brought in from AT&T as well

 

I had good service when I had sprint a few years ago but in 2013 my data speeds are appalling. The info from you has kept me a sprint customer as my location has just started to become in progress. Without this site, I would still be in the dark and gone from sprint by now.

 

ditto this...I'd be on Verizon paying through the nose but on a nice network and wouldn't have suffered through this painful process that I'm hoping ends with significant improvments in my local area so I can stay with Sprint.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...