belusnecropolis
-
Posts
1,781 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Posts posted by belusnecropolis
-
-
1 minute ago, danlodish345 said:
There is only a few phones that support it. The one I have is the lgv30.
Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
Yeah, so far no stand alone radios have it either. I don't have one I can build into a modem.
-
2 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:
T-Mobile is going to come and band 71 testing here... in less than 2 months. But that's good though beds live Where You Are.
Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
I am waiting for band 66 here. I am not sure when an embedded 600MHz radio will be available but 5 channels will be pretty impressive for the network experience.
-
3 channel aggregation is live in 29527
-
1
-
-
Lots of talk about 4 and 5 Gee layers. Sounds like more radios, paths and sweet battery death. I wonder if it will have a lame toggle button on first wave phones like airlink rollouts of yore.
The disclaimer was 299 words short of the article length in whole.
That sure says something. -
7 hours ago, nexgencpu said:
FCC supposedly gonna help fund network expansion into rural areas..
https://www.androidauthority.com/fcc-billions-for-10-mbps-lte-rural-areas-840043/
Rural user here, all LTE connectivity except the POTS line. I used the savings from dumping CableCo -(that went out when it rains) to buy LTE equipment that is capable of (aggregated) 2 Gb p/s. If I add em all up I get actual about 60 or 70 Mb p/s. This is without any company CPE or "fixed wireless" dedicated frequencies. Shooting for 5/1 or 10/2 in a certain swath is lame and essentially make-work for air DSL when we have actual GHz of spectrum becoming available and software defined networking adaptive to a wide range of frequencies.
The equipment is already there for much more, the carriers would like you to think having a dedicated, deprioritized channel coming from one site on one antenna is an actual effort at deploying good home service. Ffs just let people connect to your network in these areas and it won't be brought to it's knees, many do it every day. If you can deploy in publicly leased, licensed or even unlicensed spectrum in the hundreds of MHz you can service rural areas fully. Why would they spend millions and lobby for such large geo tracts?-
1
-
-
Does anyone know the manufacturer of the new 64x64 antenna? All I can find is KMW and they do not respond to email.
-
35 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:
Not terribly detailed, but at least a peek into how Sprint's RF team tune and test the network...
http://newsroom.sprint.com/article_display.cfm?content_id=126642&linkId=47922109
Would love to see more of these with more detail in the future...
"If you’re a news organization and would like to experience a network test drive, please contact Sprint at media.relations@sprint.com for more information."
>Belus here at the Myrtle Beach Daily Necropolis Times, tell me more about this test drive . . .
-
6
-
-
50 minutes ago, RedSpark said:
Since we have seen so many folks in the vendor/carrier alphabet soup collaborating, this seems like a great time for the smaller base carriers to get aggresive in competition. I like it. This may keep them honest on rollouts or worse, at least provide some dramady to distract us when they both light up two sites each in rural Montana on January 15 and call it a success.
Also, >twitter
I will save my super hot fire gif's once we see a reply back. Until then it is Yaass girl, 100% emoji, and fake news gifs.-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, RedSpark said:
Thanks! You are the best.
-
1
-
-
Did we get an @RedSpark update of the earnings call yet?
-
1
-
1
-
-
Not sure whether to MAGA or F A K E N E W S tag this.
The idea is great to motivate the out building of networks, densify or have the government haul out some Five Gee to cover rural areas. Make em compete on top where they wont build or create new competition. This could be part of an amazing infrastructure package. We get a sweet national network(under budget and ahead of schedule); plus we all get awesome jobs installing radios, fiber, antennas, towers and connected cars, telemedicine and the future is now etc inf.
The government being the backdoor sure sounds lame. They could also spend 2T dollars on this and have anything from a huge hole, a unique view to your usage, and misuse and abuse. Let alone the implications of all that spending, unprecedented corporate take overs, and how it all shakes out for security.
Hey if it comes to a vote and works out, hope we all get some sweet futurenet speeds.
-
16 minutes ago, Johnner1999 said:
So there seems to be some talk of a nationalized 5g network to be mandated by the government.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkQuoteWhy it matters: We’ve got our hands on a PowerPoint deck and a memo — both produced by a senior National Security Council official — which were presented recently to senior officials at other agencies in the Trump administration.
The main points: The documents say America needs a centralized nationwide 5G network within three years. There'll be a fierce debate inside the Trump administration — and an outcry from the industry — over the next 6-8 months over how such a network is built and paid for.Two options laid out by the documents:
The U.S. government pays for and builds the single network — which would be an unprecedented nationalization of a historically private infrastructure.
An alternative plan where wireless providers build their own 5G networks that compete with one another — though the document says the downside is it could take longer and cost more. It argues that one of the “pros” of that plan is that it would cause “less commercial disruption” to the wireless industry than the government building a network.
Well, that sure is something.-
2
-
-
That was a very interesting read, thanks for that.
-
Yeah man, what a time to be alive.
-
-
1 minute ago, danlodish345 said:
But obviously the CBRS.. is in the millimeter wave range so the 600 megahertz band would be used for coverage.
CBRS is 3.5-6GHz Dan. Millimeter is much higher.
-
It would make a great fit on my roof.
-
1
-
-
Thanks for the info Mr Tim. What a great toolset they have built for the network.
-
That airpole needs a splash page on Sprint dot com, like the magic box. I would thoroughly enjoy having one of those.
-
1
-
-
I enjoy the new grid style roaming area key. This is much better than experiments in yellow we saw a few months ago.
-
Good find @Paynefanbro. I expect the initial service to start naturally, in the cities they trial fixed wireless in. Good on Tmobile, pushing their hand if that is the reason. They do have an 8 billion dollar 600 MHz interest to market, so that may be a factor for all the hype. Plus cellular, companies love to hop on the next thing. I hope this makes a faster time to reach the masses then LTE did.
Also; Ha! I'm still waiting for Five Gee Evolution.
Source: My sad ATT branded Netgear Nighthawk M1 (Cat 16, 4x4 external antennae)-
1
-
-
Muh man John takes questions :)
I prewarned him in his first hour on twitter the market specific inquiries were coming. Kind of boilerplate but so far he holds up.-
2
-
-
In Room name:thelounge holding the door. Just finished cleaning up a nice networking project here at the house.
Happy New Year, have a great week everyone. -
1 hour ago, danlodish345 said:
Hey everyone happy New Years! What has everyone been doing for the past two months for the holidays?
Happy New Year sir. Working overtime.
T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2
in General Topics
Posted
Next year. The em7565 I just picked up supports all the current bands and has 5GHz LTE, Cat-12. I am gonna wait for new radio 600MHz before I go dump 200 more bucks on a chip.