RedSpark

2 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

When is Sprint's quarterly earnings presentation?

Hasn't been announced yet, but late April or early May.

Last year's Fiscal 4Q2017 call was held on May 2, 2018: https://investors.sprint.com/news-and-events/past-events/event-details/2018/Fiscal-4Q17-Earnings-Call/default.aspx

Just before that was this on April 29, 2018: https://investors.sprint.com/news-and-events/past-events/event-details/2018/Investor-and-Media-Conference-Call/default.aspx

Background: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180429005059/en/T-Mobile-Sprint-CEOs-Hold-Call-Investors-Media

49 minutes ago, clbowens said:

Has anybody had any issue with VoLTE on iPhone?  I was thinking about enabling it on my wife's iPhone.

Works very well for me here.

49 minutes ago, ingenium said:

Intel probably told them they were exiting the market, and Apple quickly settled the lawsuit with Qualcomm since they didn't have an alternative anymore.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

Could be... or it could be the other way around: Apple told Intel it was settling with Qualcomm and then Intel got out.

I’m thinking Apple will silently acquire Intel’s Modem Business/Patents and then gestate it for years while it runs through the Qualcomm Agreement Period...

Then one day... surprise!

Sprint’s recent FCC Filing is enough to get you depressed... Holy cow they’re in trouble.

https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10415297968006/Sprint%20Standalone%20Ex%20Parte%20-%20REDACTED%20-%20FINAL%20-%204.15.2019%20%5BAS-FILED%5D.pdf

There’s so much in this it’s frankly overwhelming, but here are these nuggets:

“Footnote 55: Sprint chose not to participate in the 600 MHz auction in 2016 partly due to lack of financial resources and the need to spend cash on more immediate network needs, and partly because at the time it expected to successfully densify its network using monopoles, which would have reduced the need for low band spectrum.”

Page 33: ”Churn-bomb”

Page 38: “Liquidity Wall”

If you think they’re telling the truth here, Sprint is in deep trouble...

1 hour ago, IrwinshereAgain said:

Didn't SoftBank have a provision where they would be required to buy all of the Sprint stock if they ever went over the 85% mark?  I thought that was why they couldn't just put more money into Sprint. Just asking.

Yup. https://seekingalpha.com/news/3323100-softbank-boosts-sprint-stake-84_7-percent-ownership

At this point, they would have been better taking 100% ownership of Sprint.

On February 12, 2016 they could have bought it for $2.66/share... (so could of I as well!).

41 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/sprint-blames-network-for-much-its-difficult-situation-s-only-getting-worse

So they bet the fate of the company on a non-traditional monopole strategy which failed, and now they’re stuck with doing a traditional build but lacking the actual spectrum to do that traditional build in an economical way. It’s like they didn’t anticipate a downside... or perhaps it was “we’ll merge our way out of trouble.”

No wonder there was such confidence that 600 MHz was “Spectrum of the past”. The room was probably full of people who were afraid to say no or bad idea to Masa’s network plan... and then it came crashing down to earth. This is up there with the Nextel acquisition in terms of strategic blunders, I’m sorry.

Intel will exit 5G phone modem business, hours after Apple, Qualcomm settle

https://www.cnet.com/news/intel-will-exit-5g-modem-business-hours-after-apple-qualcomm-settle/

“"The company will continue to meet current customer commitments for its existing 4G smartphone modem product line, but does not expect to launch 5G modem products in the smartphone space, including those originally planned for launches in 2020," Intel said in a press release. Its only customer in modems is Apple.“”

Holy cow!

1 hour ago, Brad The Beast said:

That would be so useful holy crap. 

Yeah. I really hope this happens. I’ve been making the ask! 😀

1 minute ago, Tengen31 said:

I don't disagree with that accept softbank isn't willing to do that. I only support it cause of 5G. TMobile has better coverage these days and I think B41 and 71 combined will make things better. Gigabit or higher speeds will require 200 mhz of spectrum. Sprint now has the lowest amount of lowband FDD spectrum. 5x5 vs 10x10 or so on everyone else. Softbank should have bought some 600 mhz also.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

Either SoftBank will be willing to pay up with a capex infusion or we'll see Sprint become part of another company. Either way, the market will retain four major wireless carrier participants, which I think it needs to.

I've been saying for a long time that it was a huge mistake for SoftBank/Sprint to sit out the 600 MHz auction. It was a huge strategic error.

Having sat it out, now Sprint is in the position of having to build out a national 5G network using the economics of 2.5GHz, which aren't as bad as Millimeter Wave, but aren't as good as 600 MHz... and it's hilarious to see Sprint justify the T-Mobile merger by saying it lacks low-band spectrum after saying it was "Spectrum of the Past".

Just desserts for SoftBank in my opinion.

33 minutes ago, jamesinclair said:

The dead zones along the northeast corridor are ridiculous. Speeds are so bad between Elizabeth and Newark I cant even load the app to report slow data.

You can manually report the problem locations in the My Sprint App at a later time by entering the address where it happened.

I've been bugging people I know at Sprint to enable a "pin drop" function on the Map so that you wouldn't have to have an exact address to make a report. Hopefully they do this.

28 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/16/sprint-stock-falls-10percent-on-report-t-mobile-merger-is-unlikely-to-be-approved-as-currently-structured.html
So in your eyes layoffs for Sprint employees is good? That's what going to happen if it fails plus how can Sprint pay for 5G when they are paying still for LTE plus they need to expand coverage instead of so much roaming which they can't afford.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

There would be layoffs if the companies merged.

How can Sprint pay for 5G?... SoftBank can open its wallet and pay for it. It owns nearly 85% of Sprint, and it has to answer to the Sprint/SoftBank shareholders if the Sprint asset continues to lag on its books.

If true, this news makes me very happy. A merger would have simply let SoftBank off the hook and it would have resulted in unnecessary carrier consolidation. I don't subscribe to the "Fear China" 5G justifications being put forward at all.

Masa/Marcelo: You might want to take your houses off the Market given this news....

https://www.kansascity.com/news/business/article42616254.html

https://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2018/11/18/claure-masayoshi-mission-hills-mansions-for-sale.html

You could be sticking around.

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/04/qualcomm-and-apple-agree-to-drop-all-litigation/

How about that.... Qualcomm's back on the menu boys!

Perhaps we'll be seeing Qualcomm chips in future iPhones again... Probably too late for the new ones coming this fall given the design cycle.

It'll be interesting to see what happens to Intel. My guess is that we'll have a 5G iPhone next year... perhaps with a Qualcomm Modem?

7 minutes ago, Cardsfan96 said:

Anyone noticing the radio performance has been getting worse? I’ve been especially noticing it when roaming. My phone will drop 3g all the time. I have noticed a big change in performance in a specific area where I roam now from when I got the phone in October. I no longer pick up us cellular LTE outside like I did before and don’t ever connect to T-Mobile band 71 when I use to. Did the new prls change something?

I've had progressively better performance on my iOS devices on Sprint: iPhone 6, 6s, 7, 8, XS.

Each has been better than the last one.

Hope it helped! What kind of equipment is this?

19 minutes ago, greenbastard said:

There's no way to refute this without getting a bit political, so I won't do that. 

But what I will say is that 5G is very important for our economy. I really hope the merger happens as it seems like SoftBank has hit a dead end. It's gotten to the point where they can't even give the service away for free.

I don't think what I said was inherently political. I think this merger has become attached to politics in certain ways, as most things can... Just as interest groups which had nothing to do with wireless (National Education Association, NAACP, GLAAD, etc.) were lumped by AT&T into supporting its attempted merger with T-Mobile at the time:

http://www.nea.org/archive/44679.htm. 

https://archives.cjr.org/the_audit/politico_is_good_on_att_buying.php

Of course the merger didn't go through, and I think one of the reasons was "overreach" by AT&T. There was so much BS PR behind that merger, that people eventually saw it for what it was... and of course, there was the leak of the ultimate truth, which undermined the whole case for the merger: http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Leaked-ATT-Letter-Demolishes-Case-For-TMobile-Merger-115652

The "Merge or we lose in 5G to china" justification is very much in the same vein.

I read this kind of stuff with great skepticism: https://twitter.com/telecoms/status/1114114312346439680

Honestly, it's fear-driving... and Dr. Saw actually retweeted this on April 5, 2019.

5G is important to our economy. However, we have a very different economy than the Chinese do. We shouldn't attempt to replicate what they do or try to beat them with a largely irreversible market consolidation.

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

T-Mobile's map looks reasonable with the pace at which they're rolling out L600. All L600 equipment is NR-Capable.

Sprint's map is heavily understated, though, I think. Sprint's 5G rollout will most definitely be more widespread than that. 

Additionally, all Ericsson radio equipment that shipped after 2015 is software upgradable to LTE+NR with their proprietary spectrum sharing technology. I'm sure Sprint will take advantage of this. 

Exactly. Sprint is underselling itself so much here it’s ridiculous... but that’s the pitch it has to make to attempt to justify a merger.

5 hours ago, Tengen31 said:

I'm talking about more than that. Coverage isn't up to par with everyone else. Uploads are not that great and, waiting on VOLTE is getting old.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

None of these are sufficient justifications for a merger in my opinion, because they can be fixed with increased capex and support from SoftBank as the parent company.

A merger simply lets SoftBank off easy and subjects the consumer to the negative effects of a consolidated carrier market... and there’s no going back from that in the near/long term.

The “Merge or we lose in 5G” argument is such a PR stretch it’s ridiculous.

1 minute ago, Tengen31 said:

That’s why the merger needs to happen.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No it doesn’t.

The whole idea of leading or “keeping up” with China for 5G is a farce in my opinion.

20 hours ago, Terrell352 said:

Considering Dan Hasse was talking about it in NV 1.0 about 7 years ago I would say it's been past ridiculous.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Yup. If the money isn’t available, you wind up with a Ferrari that doesn’t have fuel.

So much potential. So little money.

https://www.t-mobile.com/news/what-is-your-5g-future

Legere is pushing this hard with his trademark infomercial style...

Are those “separate company” network maps believable for four years from now?

25 minutes ago, Terrell352 said:

LTE Calling (Beta) is Calling Plus rebranded and has been on the S9 for months. It will actually say VoLTE when we get it.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I hope an analyst asks Sprint about VoLTE at the next Earnings Call... This is getting ridiculous.

An expanded satisfaction guarantee is a bad idea in my opinion when you can't yet offer simultaneous voice/data via VoLTE on a majority of devices.

This seems like an expensive proposition in the making...

8 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 

Speaking of VOLTE. Has Sprint said anything about the next round of VOLTE launches?

I’m dying over here.

 

Not that I’ve heard... I’m on an iPhone XS in a supported market so I’ve had it for a while now. I get what you’re feeling.

It would seem ridiculous for Sprint to have a 5G launch without officially launching VoLTE... but it’s certainly possible that could happen.

Interesting.... I think it would have been better to wait for VoLTE to go live on more devices.

Here are the speeds at Capital One Arena...

Here’s a big carrot for California...

https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2019/04/10/t-mobile-promises-41-billion-investment-in.html