-
Posts
3,878 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
155
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Everything posted by RedSpark
-
Sprint doesn't welcome this delay at all, but is putting on a happy face. What's remarkable is that LTE Plus and Sprint's other network achievements have happened in spite of WiMAX having to be kept on and maintained. The issue is that WiMAX is very spectrum inefficient. As I understand it, no adjacent WiMAX sites can broadcast on the same frequencies and this specifically affects Sprint's 2.5GHz deployment. Also, the old single mode WiMAX gear can't be pulled/replaced until the network is finally shut down.
-
Cue the music....
-
Masa is paying property taxes In Mission Hills: https://www.opkansas.org/city-government/sales-and-property-taxes/property-tax-rate-comparison/property-tax-rates-johnson-county-cities/ How to calculate property tax: http://www.opkansas.org/city-government/sales-and-property-taxes/how-taxes-are-calculated/ Also, SoftBank already owns 83 percent of Sprint, so it can’t invest much more in Sprint. If SoftBank's ownership hits 85%, it actually triggers a contractual mandate from the original merger agreement and SoftBank has to buy out Sprint entirely (as in, buy the rest of the shares). See here for the original merger prospectus which says this: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1560158/000119312513192860/d425100d424b3.htm (Do a text search for "85%" and you'll see the applicable section.) At the time the merger was completed in July 2013, SoftBank acquired a 72% stake in Sprint: http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-and-softbank-announce-completion-of-merger.htm Since then, SoftBank has gradually increased its ownership stake with regular share purchases: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-30/softbank-increases-its-stake-in-sprint-to-83-19- So now my opinion, it's fine Masa got a $5.5M house. He's paying for it and hopefully good things come from those taxes.
-
Marcelo just posted: Our 50% offer exceeded our expectations, leading us to extend it another month. That's a good sign it seems? EDIT: Misread that... Seems like he's just referring to the month that it was already extended.... Oops. On another note... Based on this Tweet, sounds like there's a Town Hall this Friday. At least, that's what the GIF says at the 1:15 mark.
-
Sprint has a very rudimentary chart on that page which shows BF vs. BF + CA. I'd like to see a lot more data on this. Isn't the long term plan for Sprint to use certain bands for downlink-only and others for uplink-only? I agree with you. (Apple has shown equal neglect for the Field Test Screen on iOS) Customers would benefit from even having a Band 41 device... but for people who just want it to "work" (but don't understand why) and will stay a customer if it does, it seems to me that getting a 2xCA Device in their hands makes that all the more likely to be the case... and hopefully they tell their friends that Sprint "just works". Sprint needs to relentlessly drive home the message: "LTE Plus means better speeds and coverage. Here are the devices which support it." From Saw's Post:
-
You know a lot more about this than I do (in fact, you'd forget more than I'd ever learn), but based on John Saw's LTE Plus Blog Post from November 2015, it seems like even typical users would benefit from having 2xCA devices. In response to your statement "Those are for RootMetrics results, Sprint bragging rights -- to gain back public perception"... Isn't that what's needed here? People aren't Sprint customers sometimes because of RootMetrics results (though that's now changing) or because Sprint doesn't have the bragging rights... or doesn't have the right public perception. For many customers, I'd wonder how much their overall Sprint experience would change if you took a Dual Band or Tri-Band device out of their hands and swapped in an LTE Plus device.... Would they call Customer Care less often? Would they report Speed/Coverage issues less often? Would they tell their friends/colleagues: "Hey, I've got Sprint and it's awesome now. I'm also paying a lot less than you are." At some point, these 2xCA devices would seem to pay for themselves either through higher customer satisfaction/retention, new customer acquisition or lower care costs. I hope Sprint is being aggressive about making it appealing for customers to upgrade to an LTE Plus device and roll their old Single/Dual/Tri-Band devices off the network.
-
So what do you think it'll take for "Android Forever" to launch viably? Marcelo originally said it would happen. What changed?
-
I thought this metric from the Quarterly Investor Update (Page 5) was especially important: Tri-band phones represented 64 percent of the 25.3 million ending postpaid phone connection base compared to 27 percent at the end of the year-ago quarter and 54 percent at the end of the prior quarter. During the quarter, 93 percent of postpaid phones sold were tri-band, an increase from 78 percent in the year-ago period and 89 percent in the prior quarter. Two-channel (2x20 MHz) carrier aggregation capable phones, which allow for higher data speeds, were 76 percent of postpaid phones sold during the quarter, increasing the number of these phones within the phone base to 21 percent. Tri-band penetration still isn't close enough to 100%, and if we assume a current rate of growth, it should be in the 90% percent range within another year. As for 2xCA devices, Sprint needs to make it easier for customers to upgrade to the newest technology, not harder. Get those handset leasing vehicles in place and launch "Android Forever" already so those numbers continue to improve.
-
So the small cell deployment is an integral part of VoLTE?
-
I'll go one further... It smells like the wireline providers (Verizon/AT&T) or their PR/Trade Association Surrogates.... They have a lot to lose based on this article:
-
Jeez. That's a long way from "Network Vision". Ridiculous title.
-
You just have to stop reading what they write no matter what click-bait title they use or use adblocking on their sites. Look at Craig Moffett... He's been saying Sprint's been going out of business for years, and yet he magically maintains an aura of credibility in many circles... I don't know how.
-
Yeah. These stories smell like "plants" to me too.
-
Great information! RCRWireless News has decided to take the counterpoint with an article published today which includes the phrase "Network Suicide" in the title.... Analyst Angle: Sprint network plan equals ‘Network Suicide’ People have said Sprint would go bankrupt for years and they've been wrong time after time... now its new Network Plans will kill it apparently. Never mind the fact that the whole premise of the re/code article on which it was based has been debunked. Jeezuz.... Where do they find these "Analysts"?