Jump to content

Contract/Lease/Easy Pay/BYOD...Which do you choose?


spotmeterf64

Contract, easy pay, lease, full price  

74 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you buy your phone?

    • 2-year contract
      30
    • Easy Pay
      7
    • Lease
      9
    • BYOD or pay full price up-front
      28


Recommended Posts

I wonder for the BYOD or pay full price upfront guys, how much do they usually pay for their phones?  And what type of phones do they buy?

 

Unlocked, third party sold handsets that cost around $400.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changed my vote from 2-year contract to BYOD/pay in full. I couldn't resist ordering a Moto X Pure Edition from Amazon's deal of the day today. I had $100 in Amazon credit to use so $250 out of pocket for the 32GB model was the right price for me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changed my vote from 2-year contract to BYOD/pay in full. I couldn't resist ordering a Moto X Pure Edition from Amazon's deal of the day today. I had $100 in Amazon credit to use so $250 out of pocket for the 32GB model was the right price for me.

Seriously, why are phones charging a $700 premium?  If other flagships can still make a profit from $400 sales, then the industry is in need of some serious changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, why are phones charging a $700 premium?  If other flagships can still make a profit from $400 sales, then the industry is in need of some serious changes.

 

The premium is not $700 -- that is the total price.  The premium is more like $300 above and beyond what is reasonable profit.  And that likely is a product of the contract subsidy system and the iPhone.  The contract subsidy system has hidden the profit margins in the monthly plan costs.  And the iPhone has set the inflated price points for modern smartphones.

 

But all of that is changing.  Personally, over the past almost three years now, I have bought several superb handsets right at the time of release at full price -- and have not paid more than $425 per handset.  Nexus 5.  2014 Moto X (Republic Wireless MVNO).  2015 Moto X.  Nexus 5X.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The premium is not $700 -- that is the total price.  The premium is more like $300 above and beyond what is reasonable profit.  And that likely is a product of the contract subsidy system and the iPhone.  The contract subsidy system has hidden the profit margins in the monthly plan costs.  And the iPhone has set the inflated price points for modern smartphones.

 

But all of that is changing.  Personally, over the past almost three years now, I have bought several superb handsets right at the time of release at full price -- and have not paid more than $425 per handset.  Nexus 5.  2014 Moto X (Republic Wireless MVNO).  2015 Moto X.  Nexus 5X.

 

AJ

I didn't mean they are making $700 profit per device, I just know they're marked up quite a bit.  I am currently running the Nexus 5x until one of the SD 820s release next year with 3xCA-capable modems.  It'll be glorious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, why are phones charging a $700 premium?  If other flagships can still make a profit from $400 sales, then the industry is in need of some serious changes.

 

 

Moto is not making a profit on the X, or probably any of the other phones they make...I saw a link earlier that broke down each company's ARPU. Lenovo/Moto lost money on each phone sold. Pretty much only Apple and Samsung made a decent profit per phone; Apple obviously much higher than Samsung.

 

I don't pretend to know Moto's business model. They lose money on each phone, but have nothing to upsell customers to. Samsung loses money on the cheap prepaid burners but they make it up on the Note and S series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...