Jump to content

RRU-BBU connections - questions


mobileopticsguy

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to get a handle on the specifics of RRU-BBU connections. Ultimately I care about the number of SFP/SFP+ transceivers an RRU is equipped with.

 

I know the RRU-BBU can be connected via either two-fiber with TX and Rx on different fibers, or single-fiber if bi-directional, so let's use the term 'links' instead of 'number of fibers' to keep things simple.

 

1. How many 'links' does an RRU need back to the BBU?  What determines how many are required?

 

2. How many transceivers can an RRU handle? I know they aren't all identical, so what is typical, what is the max, etc.?

 

I think based on my research that the answer is very nearly always '1 link per RRH to the BBU'. (One exception I know of is the NSN FlexiRadio RRU which has three optical ports.) A colleague believes the answer is '1 per attached RF transceiver', which means multiple fiber links from one RRU.  Who's right?

 

Another question - in a Ground Mount Option build, with the RRU located at the bottom of the tower, is the connection up to the panel copper or fiber?  I read here that 'existing cables can be reused' which seems to imply copper in at least some instances.

 

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Another question - in a Ground Mount Option build, with the RRU located at the bottom of the tower, is the connection up to the panel copper or fiber?  I read here that 'existing cables can be reused' which seems to imply copper in at least some instances.

 

 

Thanks.

 

All final connections to antennas are coax jumpers. 

 

GMO builds utilize existing copper coax jumpers which can be dozens to hundred+ feet long. Full build modern sites utilize hybrid cable with fiber and power up to the tower top radio unit and then the final connection from radio unit to antenna are copper coax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the GMO, are the RRUs are still connected to the BBU via a fiber optic connection, just a shorter one? 

Connections to the radios are always optical.  This is one of the benefits of the remote radio, the elimination of the signal loss in the long coaxial cable going up the tower.  Since optical has zero loss, the change from generally 200+ ft of antenna feed line to 6, can make a huge difference in cell site performance.  You can use that difference to either save power by decreasing radio power where additional capability is not required in densely deployed areas, or to extend signal range and improve in building coverage in sparsely deployed areas.  Additionally, with the reduction of interference, better radio performance should be possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...