Jump to content

RRU-BBU connections - questions


mobileopticsguy

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to get a handle on the specifics of RRU-BBU connections. Ultimately I care about the number of SFP/SFP+ transceivers an RRU is equipped with.

 

I know the RRU-BBU can be connected via either two-fiber with TX and Rx on different fibers, or single-fiber if bi-directional, so let's use the term 'links' instead of 'number of fibers' to keep things simple.

 

1. How many 'links' does an RRU need back to the BBU?  What determines how many are required?

 

2. How many transceivers can an RRU handle? I know they aren't all identical, so what is typical, what is the max, etc.?

 

I think based on my research that the answer is very nearly always '1 link per RRH to the BBU'. (One exception I know of is the NSN FlexiRadio RRU which has three optical ports.) A colleague believes the answer is '1 per attached RF transceiver', which means multiple fiber links from one RRU.  Who's right?

 

Another question - in a Ground Mount Option build, with the RRU located at the bottom of the tower, is the connection up to the panel copper or fiber?  I read here that 'existing cables can be reused' which seems to imply copper in at least some instances.

 

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Another question - in a Ground Mount Option build, with the RRU located at the bottom of the tower, is the connection up to the panel copper or fiber?  I read here that 'existing cables can be reused' which seems to imply copper in at least some instances.

 

 

Thanks.

 

All final connections to antennas are coax jumpers. 

 

GMO builds utilize existing copper coax jumpers which can be dozens to hundred+ feet long. Full build modern sites utilize hybrid cable with fiber and power up to the tower top radio unit and then the final connection from radio unit to antenna are copper coax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the GMO, are the RRUs are still connected to the BBU via a fiber optic connection, just a shorter one? 

Connections to the radios are always optical.  This is one of the benefits of the remote radio, the elimination of the signal loss in the long coaxial cable going up the tower.  Since optical has zero loss, the change from generally 200+ ft of antenna feed line to 6, can make a huge difference in cell site performance.  You can use that difference to either save power by decreasing radio power where additional capability is not required in densely deployed areas, or to extend signal range and improve in building coverage in sparsely deployed areas.  Additionally, with the reduction of interference, better radio performance should be possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...