Jump to content

Where is the Moto X+1 FCC filing?


Recommended Posts

Posted

For the original Moto X and Moto G, Motorola submitted to the FCC about 80 days before the official public announcement/unveiling.

 

The Moto E showed up on the FCC's website sooner, just 33 days before it was announced.

 

Now here we are, knowing with near certainty that Motorola's event scheduled for September 4th, 2014 will announce a new Moto X (among other things).   That's just 13 days from today, and there's still no sign of the new Moto X on the FCC's website.  The previously promised release date (which may be different from the announcement on 9/4) was "the final days of summer", which would be before 9/22.

 

My question is: How unusual is this?  It seems like it's really pushing it based on the recent history of Motorola for the X/G/E, but I haven't really looked to see what companies typically do aside from those 3 instances.

  • Like 1
Posted

Apple submits their information to the FCC the same day that they announce their phones. Sometimes other companies announce devices, and then you see the FCC filings later between announcement and launch. Take the Galaxy Alpha. The China Mobile version just received FCC OET approval this week, yet the phone was announced over a week ago.

  • Like 1
Posted

Apple submits their information to the FCC the same day that they announce their phones. Sometimes other companies announce devices, and then you see the FCC filings later between announcement and launch. Take the Galaxy Alpha. The China Mobile version just received FCC OET approval this week, yet the phone was announced over a week ago.

 

Interesting.  Thanks for the info!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I really apreciate no longer seeing n38 for T-Mobile. My s24 Ultra is reporting that Signalcheck Pro is crashing frequently.  It has the latest updates. I do occassional change sims and band preferences. Let me know if you need anything else.   Thanks.
    • Spent a lot of time in Westchester this weekend, specifically Yonkers and White Plains. I mapped three AT&T Nokia -> Ericsson conversions. I was super impressed with T-Mobile's macro density and not so much with AT&T's. In Yonkers it seems like T-Mobile macros outnumber AT&T macros 3 to 1 and in White Plains, 2 to 1. Another surprise was the lack of small cells on AT&T in both cities. While Cellmapper shows White Plains having no small cells, I did manage to find one in the Church Street neighborhood. While it's only one, it's an indication to me that T-Mobile intends on expanding n41 density with small cells in the city. On the other hand, in Yonkers T-Mobile has a ton of LTE small cells but none of them have been upgraded to 5G yet as far as I can tell. Crown Castle has been moving super fast in NYC and Long Island to upgrade and install new 5G small cells so I can only assume it's either a permitting or backhaul issue that's stopping them from moving full steam ahead there. — — — — — Came across this cool site in Yonkers with Verizon, T-Mobile, and Dish present.
    • Other two sectors finally installed. Hopefully it goes live soon though I know from past experience that these new builds can take weeks and in some cases months to go live.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...