Jump to content

Merging CT Market Topics


dstar2002
 Share

Recommended Posts

Think we might be able to just merge the two Connecticut threads for Northern and Southern?  We are such a small area that most people end up discussing both in each thread.  Just a suggestion for a mod to consider.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think we might be able to just merge the two Connecticut threads for Northern and Southern?  We are such a small area that most people end up discussing both in each thread.  Just a suggestion for a mod to consider.

Even though I dont pay much attention to this area since I live in Western NY state, but I noticed this too..... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm not mistaken, Market Threads are broken down to how they are in Sprint's system, so they're generally kept separate here as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea they are, but its just not conducive to keeping a good discussion going, since there is so much cross posting.  Frankly, why Sprint has them seperate, is beyond me.  Southern CT did roll out NV 1 first, but both are in nearly identical states now, same vendors, even same sub-contractors from everything I have seen.

 

Was just an idea to streamline my area.  In the premiere section I am tracking CT as a whole, just makes no sense to do it the Sprint way for me.

 

If not, no big deal, but the Northern CT thread is dead anyway.  Only I post in it.  The southern guys are posting northern info into the southern thread.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm not mistaken, Market Threads are broken down to how they are in Sprint's system, so they're generally kept separate here as well.

While that's generally true, there is at least one exception that i know of -- Upstate NY East and Central are combined into one thread -- so there is some precedent for combining markets. I actually think it would make more sense for the CT markets than it does for Upstate NY, which is such a large area when you combine the two.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It made a lot of sense in the beginning of Network Vision to have them separate, as the Southern CT market started quite a bit earlier.  But now at this point, merging them is fine with me.  Especially since the Southern market is pretty quiet.

 

Done!

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2059-network-visionlte-northern-southern-connecticut-markets-includes-all-cities/

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Great job on your analysis of small cells versus the 3.45GHZ and the population coverage requirements. I wonder if the fcc is stalling because they may address the key limitation of of 2.5: the convoluted frequencies. Not sure how they would get there, but it would be better public policy if you could actually use a single license in current times, ie 5, 10 or 20MHz. Of course they could also go in more of a nonprofit or small business direction. But most likely they will keep it as planned given how messy the transition would be. In many/most metro areas BRS/EBS is fully licensed. Would be nice if they put pressure on the squatters.
    • I didn't actually look at the buildout requirements before making that comment - they're definitely going to have to deploy on macro sites if they want to hit the buildout requirements. PEA001 has a population of 25,237,061, of which they will have to hit 45% in 4 years (11,356,677) and 80% in 8 years (20,189,649). If they were to cover the entirely, all five boroughs, of NYC using only small cells (something I'd say is impossible considering their current small cell density), they'd only be covering 32% of the population in the PEA. And this is with spectrum that only adds 300Mb/s per sector and will likely have only 50% the range of their current n41 equipment. Doesn't really seem worth it to me. I'm of the opinion that they're looking to hedge their bets in further EBS/BRS acquisition. 
    • These strand mounts also are deployed with Band 46 (LAA), in my experience. I have yet to encounter a strand mount with exclusively 2/66. 
    • Bought a esim "sim" card a few weeks ago that operates in all of my more current phones according to its app. It arrived a couple of weeks early from Berlin.  Now if my MVNOs would get moving and support more than iPhones and rarely Pixels so I can test this thing. https://esim.me The only item really troubling so far is reviews in google play store keep getting deleted, even 5 star ones.
    • Still waiting impatiently for my T-Mobile security update.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...