Jump to content

Excessive Adjacent channel interference?


briank101

Recommended Posts

There a particular stretch of roadway where my data speed drops to near zero everyday as I pass two competitor cell towers (50 yards to the left of me). If I'm listening to the 40 kbps streaming radio station I often listen to, it will be cutoff for about a minute. The Sprint EV-DO signal level is in the -90 dBm range (the nearest Sprint tower is about 1.5 miles away). It may happen in other areas but this is one that I can verify is consistent.

 

I would have thought with modern smartphone technology that the selectivity would be such as to prevent problems such as this and also that the beam tilt of the other provider towers would be such that they are not radiating too much power downwards. Or is it an adjacent 10 MHz wide LTE carrier one channel away from the Sprint 1.25 MHz EV-DO carrier the issue? Not sure if this affects voice calls as well as I have never been on a call at this spot, plus Sprint usually has me on the 1X800 band for voice anyway?

 

Has anyone else had this issue and is this something that we have to put up with when in the vicinity of any cell tower that is not our own provider? Not sure what the FCC adjacent channel interference guidelines are with this, considering this is not a 10,000 watt radio station but perhaps 10 watt signals at most at this particular suburban location.

 

PS. This is another reason why signal strength alone can be a bad indicator of potential data speed in addition to a host of other factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There a particular stretch of roadway where my data speed drops to near zero everyday as I pass two competitor cell towers (50 yards to the left of me). If I'm listening to the 40 kbps streaming radio station I often listen to, it will be cutoff for about a minute. The Sprint EV-DO signal level is in the -90 dBm range (the nearest Sprint tower is about 1.5 miles away). It may happen in other areas but this is one that I can verify is consistent.

 

I would have thought with modern smartphone technology that the selectivity would be such as to prevent problems such as this and also that the beam tilt of the other provider towers would be such that they are not radiating too much power downwards. Or is it an adjacent 10 MHz wide LTE carrier one channel away from the Sprint 1.25 MHz EV-DO carrier the issue? Not sure if this affects voice calls as well as I have never been on a call at this spot, plus Sprint usually has me on the 1X800 band for voice anyway?

 

Has anyone else had this issue and is this something that we have to put up with when in the vicinity of any cell tower that is not our own provider? Not sure what the FCC adjacent channel interference guidelines are with this, considering this is not a 10,000 watt radio station but perhaps 10 watt signals at most at this particular suburban location.

 

PS. This is another reason why signal strength alone can be a bad indicator of potential data speed in addition to a host of other factors.

 

1. Are you receiving the music on LTE or EVDO?  2. If on LTE, have you looked at the LTE SNR value? There were rumors a few months ago about another provider interfering with Sprint LTE, and the supposed indicator was an outrageously poor signal-to-noise ratio.  The rumor was never verified, but look for SNR values near zero even in the presence good signal strength, which might indicate interference (or might indicate very heavy subscriber overloading).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using EVDO, and funny thing SNR stays in the 4 to 7 dB range (if I recall), I don't recall what the Ec/lo is though, I might make a note of this today. I'll try to remember to take a screenshot this evening when I pass there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like clockwork the data dropped as I was passing the 2 "other cell company" towers on my way home yesterday.

Here's the SignalCheck screenshot. SNR was 7 dB so I don't know if that takes into account adj channel swamping. Now as I understand CDMA EV-DO has elements of spread spectrum technology so I would have just expected a data slow down, but bad enough to thwart a 40 kbps stream?..... not sure what's going on.

post-32078-0-09509800-1393428502_thumb.png

 

Here's a pic of one of the other company cell towers as I pass it.

post-32078-0-47398700-1393429014_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like a failed handoff, not interference.  You may be looking at the other operators sites in search of a cause, but their presence is probably just coincidence.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like a failed handoff, not interference.  You may be looking at the other operators sites in search of a cause, but their presence is probably just coincidence.

 

AJ

It's a consistent failed handoff though day after day and tracing back the BSID, it is connected to the correct sector on the nearest Sprint tower. I am in search of the cause and the other operator site was for me the first thing to suspect.

 

So if it is a bad handoff what would cause a consistent bad hand off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Another SCP beta is rolling out now, with some bugfixes as usual but also some fun new options to test: Non-standalone 5G-NR cells can now display Site Notes. This feature works in the same manner as how neighbor cell notes are displayed, requiring a PCI and your device's location. This option is enabled by default. As is the case with neighbor cell notes, you cannot edit NSA site notes directly unless there is an NCI being reported (which I have never seen); it uses the previously recorded standalone log entries. Like neighbor notes, if a cell has been previously logged but there is no note, you will see the distance information only.   Logging cells that are not reporting a valid PLMN is now possible. This option is disabled by default, but if you enable it along with two other options (log sites with missing GCI/NCI and to log sites with missing TAC), you should begin logging most NSA 5G-NR cells. A PCI is needed at a minimum, which is not always reported depending on your device and network factors. ("Sites" will be renamed to "cells" on the Preferences menu in the next update.)   Users can enable an option to display LTE cells above 5G-NR cells in the app if they choose to do so. This option is disabled by default. Should help improve the readability of your screen if you have NSA 5G-NR cells constantly appearing/disappearing. Please give these options a try and let me know if you notice any issues.. thanks!
    • Not yet. We probably won't see one submitted until construction on the new building is substantially complete. 
    • Yes, that is where the site used to be. All the antennas were removed. I hope they add a new site soon. Have any permits been submitted for a new site?
    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
    • Yep, you can see the site was taken down between Aug 2022 and Apr 2023.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...