Jump to content

Excessive Adjacent channel interference?


briank101
 Share

Recommended Posts

There a particular stretch of roadway where my data speed drops to near zero everyday as I pass two competitor cell towers (50 yards to the left of me). If I'm listening to the 40 kbps streaming radio station I often listen to, it will be cutoff for about a minute. The Sprint EV-DO signal level is in the -90 dBm range (the nearest Sprint tower is about 1.5 miles away). It may happen in other areas but this is one that I can verify is consistent.

 

I would have thought with modern smartphone technology that the selectivity would be such as to prevent problems such as this and also that the beam tilt of the other provider towers would be such that they are not radiating too much power downwards. Or is it an adjacent 10 MHz wide LTE carrier one channel away from the Sprint 1.25 MHz EV-DO carrier the issue? Not sure if this affects voice calls as well as I have never been on a call at this spot, plus Sprint usually has me on the 1X800 band for voice anyway?

 

Has anyone else had this issue and is this something that we have to put up with when in the vicinity of any cell tower that is not our own provider? Not sure what the FCC adjacent channel interference guidelines are with this, considering this is not a 10,000 watt radio station but perhaps 10 watt signals at most at this particular suburban location.

 

PS. This is another reason why signal strength alone can be a bad indicator of potential data speed in addition to a host of other factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There a particular stretch of roadway where my data speed drops to near zero everyday as I pass two competitor cell towers (50 yards to the left of me). If I'm listening to the 40 kbps streaming radio station I often listen to, it will be cutoff for about a minute. The Sprint EV-DO signal level is in the -90 dBm range (the nearest Sprint tower is about 1.5 miles away). It may happen in other areas but this is one that I can verify is consistent.

 

I would have thought with modern smartphone technology that the selectivity would be such as to prevent problems such as this and also that the beam tilt of the other provider towers would be such that they are not radiating too much power downwards. Or is it an adjacent 10 MHz wide LTE carrier one channel away from the Sprint 1.25 MHz EV-DO carrier the issue? Not sure if this affects voice calls as well as I have never been on a call at this spot, plus Sprint usually has me on the 1X800 band for voice anyway?

 

Has anyone else had this issue and is this something that we have to put up with when in the vicinity of any cell tower that is not our own provider? Not sure what the FCC adjacent channel interference guidelines are with this, considering this is not a 10,000 watt radio station but perhaps 10 watt signals at most at this particular suburban location.

 

PS. This is another reason why signal strength alone can be a bad indicator of potential data speed in addition to a host of other factors.

 

1. Are you receiving the music on LTE or EVDO?  2. If on LTE, have you looked at the LTE SNR value? There were rumors a few months ago about another provider interfering with Sprint LTE, and the supposed indicator was an outrageously poor signal-to-noise ratio.  The rumor was never verified, but look for SNR values near zero even in the presence good signal strength, which might indicate interference (or might indicate very heavy subscriber overloading).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using EVDO, and funny thing SNR stays in the 4 to 7 dB range (if I recall), I don't recall what the Ec/lo is though, I might make a note of this today. I'll try to remember to take a screenshot this evening when I pass there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like clockwork the data dropped as I was passing the 2 "other cell company" towers on my way home yesterday.

Here's the SignalCheck screenshot. SNR was 7 dB so I don't know if that takes into account adj channel swamping. Now as I understand CDMA EV-DO has elements of spread spectrum technology so I would have just expected a data slow down, but bad enough to thwart a 40 kbps stream?..... not sure what's going on.

post-32078-0-09509800-1393428502_thumb.png

 

Here's a pic of one of the other company cell towers as I pass it.

post-32078-0-47398700-1393429014_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like a failed handoff, not interference.  You may be looking at the other operators sites in search of a cause, but their presence is probably just coincidence.

 

AJ

It's a consistent failed handoff though day after day and tracing back the BSID, it is connected to the correct sector on the nearest Sprint tower. I am in search of the cause and the other operator site was for me the first thing to suspect.

 

So if it is a bad handoff what would cause a consistent bad hand off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Curious as to how SCP works with it regarding NSA, particularly in markets with n41 BW=100 and second channel.
    • Downloading now. ****DVK3, 2.3 GB in size. 
    • T-Mobile eNB 879491/879493/879494 on the keep site map is located at 40.77536940167816, -73.92011957697034. Sprint eNB 5762 is now T-Mobile eNB 306271. Located at 40.582064139078206, -74.16175767702059 Weirdly both of the new Sprint conversions that have been found in Staten Island (eNB 306271 and eNB 326459) were sites I visited earlier this summer but neither of them were broadcasting the keep PLMN at the time. In fact, Sprint eNB 5762 was completely offline when I visited. I suspected both sites were keep sites based on their location relative to neighboring T-Mobile sites so I was surprised when I didn't spot 312-250 coming from them. Glad to see T-Mobile still kept them. Also T-Mobile isn't done with non-conversion new builds in the city. T-Mobile eNB 894075 is a brand new site added this summer on Rockefeller University's campus in Manhattan. It gives me hope for neighborhoods like Red Hook and Williamsburg that desperately need sites along the waterfront.
    • Nearly every site I encountered in the Bronx was running N41 SA. Consistent pings in the low teens and speeds were actually great. Sprint eNB 9294 got converted but isn't live yet. Location: 40.83091697219704, -73.8178106151994   Sprint eNB unknown, now T-Mobile eNB 310677 Location:40.880070855974395, -73.83644046611454   Sprint eNB Unknown, now T-Mobile eNB 894775. Bonus speed test with 2CA and N41 SA. Location: 40.8989406640668, -73.84564472722599   Sprint eNB Unknown, now T-Mobile eNB 894854. 40.86220687471859, -73.86242513896488  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...