Jump to content

Modified software to prevent Q10 unlocking


Recommended Posts

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I would like to see a technical explanation as to how 5G network slicing is supposed to work with Net Neutrality.  My read on this which may be incorrect is that network slicing would only be allowed under net neutrality so long as the slice of the network is a private network but that seems to contradict the ability for the general public to use a public facing app from the app store that will run over the network slice.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/fixed-wireless-access/t-mobile-verizon-disclose-fwa-usage-stats I disagree with this article.  AT&T and Verizon have many rural sites without C-Band (or mmWave),  which ultimately are use it or lose it for them due to licensing requirements.  T-Mobile's rural FWA will greatly benefit once Auction 108 licenses are finally awarded.  Thus much growth is left for FWA.  So far the carriers have been going after the low hanging fruit in the suburbs and exburbs.  In those places FWA may ultimately be forced out.  Perhaps by them BEAD money would be better put to use to bury fiber in suburban back yards (or next to the curb).  This assumes that FWA will result in more rural towers given better economics with wireless plus FWA revenue.
    • https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/verizons-joe-russo-explains-why-being-first-5g-sa-wasnt-priority Excuses or valid? likely a bit of both.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...