Jump to content

Some experiments with SDR.

Recommended Posts

After reading the awesome post @

, I decided to do some stuff with my LG-D820, RTL-SDR(w/E4000,and a 1-paper-clip antenna).


Using the calculations mentioned in that post, I tuned to the 18xx frequency, and to the 19xx, based on the info from 1x engineering. I saw a wider signal than I was expecting, but soon found that the 1900 band uses 5MHz allocations, and not 1.25 as 800 does.


I have been getting eHRPD w/EVDO, and occasionaly 1x, so did not need to check LTE.


I made a call, checked for new email, and streamed video, as testing.


However, according to that post, 18xx is uplink (phone to tower) and 1900 is downlink (tower to phone). This was what the looking around showed me. However, I only saw traffic on the uplink (a lot, proportional to the actions being performed (email checking makes a bit of activity, and watching streaming video makes much more, for longer). However, on the downlink frequency, no discernable activity showed. Is this because my paper clip antenna will not pick up the towers anyway, or is this my device doing secret stuff? :-D Or is an alternate downlink frequency being used, or is my device rebroadcasting traffic (for the NSA :-D), or maybe for traffic alleviation via mesh network



Attached is the screen of SDR app!


Enjoy! :-)


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's probably that the paperclip can't hear the tower very well. Those cheap SDR's don't have very good receive sensitivity. Since your phone is probably very close to the SDR, it will show a very strong signal, and depending on how your signal is on your phone, it could be broadcasting something like 5 watts of power. 


I've been having some fun with my RTL-SDR and I'm considering getting a more expensive Ettus Research SDR to experiment with. I actually hooked my SDR up to my big ham radio antenna in my back yard and I can hear AM broadcasts from the other side of the world. Those things are a lot of fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, everyone!


Makes sense. (and as far as I know the RTL-SDR does not use beamforming techniques for SDMA receiving out-of-the-box :-D)


But anyway, it is pretty awesome seeing my device radio-waving!


I don't have an amatuer radio antenna, since I don't have an amateur radio license (at least not yet)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most Hams build there antennas for the higher bands. You do not need a license to listen and you can find the info on the net. In the order of a high gain directional antenna will work best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Antenna input is attached to coaxial cable which goes to somewhere outside (hopefully roof antenna, hard to work outside in the winter coldness to verify this!).


1x800 voice call, uplink (signal changes based on voice, full volume -> full signal):



1x800 voice call, downlink (in order to see any change in signal, had to hold the device within a few inches of the SDR device. Signal may be some kind of subtraction/difference or something.):




EV-DO data 1900 downlink:


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • That's actually really useful information when trying to locate/map these. On CellMapper, if I look for B46 it cuts through a lot of th noise.
    • Crunching the numbers a bit more, covering the full MSA would result in slightly under 80% population coverage. But they'd have to deploy on essentially every micro/macro cell in the area.   Yeah, I'm not gonna pretend like I know how either negotiations with squatters or Auction 108 will pan out. That said, I can't see 3.45GHz being *that* valuable to squatters considering the strict buildout requirements.  Another interesting thought I had was a possible spectrum trade with Dish. Dish is still leasing 600MHz to T-Mobile in quite a few metro areas, and I'm sure T-Mobile is looking ahead to what their lowband spectrum situation will be once those leases expire. If T-Mobile is truly going to rely on n71+n41 CA as much as they say they will, it sure would be nice to be working with more than 5MHz-10MHz of n71 uplink capacity. Don't go quoting me on that, though, total (pipedream) speculation haha.
    • Great job on your analysis of small cells versus the 3.45GHZ and the population coverage requirements. I wonder if the fcc is stalling because they may address the key limitation of of 2.5: the convoluted frequencies. Not sure how they would get there, but it would be better public policy if you could actually use a single license in current times, ie 5, 10 or 20MHz. Of course they could also go in more of a nonprofit or small business direction. But most likely they will keep it as planned given how messy the transition would be. In many/most metro areas BRS/EBS is fully licensed. Would be nice if they put pressure on the squatters.
    • I didn't actually look at the buildout requirements before making that comment - they're definitely going to have to deploy on macro sites if they want to hit the buildout requirements. PEA001 has a population of 25,237,061, of which they will have to hit 45% in 4 years (11,356,677) and 80% in 8 years (20,189,649). If they were to cover the entirely, all five boroughs, of NYC using only small cells (something I'd say is impossible considering their current small cell density), they'd only be covering 32% of the population in the PEA. And this is with spectrum that only adds 300Mb/s per sector and will likely have only 50% the range of their current n41 equipment. Doesn't really seem worth it to me. I'm of the opinion that they're looking to hedge their bets in further EBS/BRS acquisition. 
    • These strand mounts also are deployed with Band 46 (LAA), in my experience. I have yet to encounter a strand mount with exclusively 2/66. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...