Jump to content

The 20mhz/40mhz 2.4ghz/5.8.ghz wifi thread


rf40928

Recommended Posts

No it is in the fcc and ntia regs on frequency allocation

 

No, you are misreading something because the cited 6 MHz stat does not correspond to reality.

 

Wi-Fi channelization in the ISM 2.4 GHz band is 5 MHz.  But this thread is about Wi-Fi carrier bandwidth, not Wi-Fi channelization.  And Wi-Fi carrier bandwidth is 20 MHz for 802.11b and 16.25 MHz for 802.11g/n.  So, each carrier takes up several channels -- the reason why 802.11b/g/n network congestion is a problem.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you want me to bring up the US band plan on 2.4 Ghz again where it says in plain detail that wifi only holds 66 mhz of that band in 11 channels and or is secondary to primary users of that frequency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you want me to bring up the US band plan on 2.4 Ghz again where it says in plain detail that wifi only holds 66 mhz of that band in 11 channels and or is secondary to primary users of that frequency

 

Again, you are misreading the numbers.  The range for channels 1-11 is 2401-2473 MHz.  That 72 MHz divided by 11 channels is 6.55 MHz.  But you cannot simply do that math, as it represents nothing in reality.  As I have accurately stated, channel spacing is actually 5 MHz, while carrier bandwidth is either 20 MHz or 16.25 MHz, causing many overlapping carriers.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now go look up fcc part 90 rules especially on wifi.

 

I am familiar with Part 90.  It is hundreds of pages long.  I am not doing the digging for you.  If you want to persist with this 6 MHz claim that flies in the face of channelization and occupied bandwidth in actual use, then you need to produce the info.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...