Jump to content

Sprint SMR Spectrum holdings...


Recommended Posts

817/861mhz would be where the 1xAdvanced would be placed... wonder why that might be missing from the list, seems also this map shows Sprint having the spectrum thru all the SouthernLinc areas too.

 

/b

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The blog notes this:

 

"The SMR and EBS/BRS spectrum is a bit messy – the spectrum licenses I download don’t correspond to the ULS, so there are mismatches and somewhat clumsy records."

 

So that could explain it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may be that he is working through the kinks of his new method. The previous way he would update the maps got borked, and he now has to comb threw the data manually. 

 
 
 
here is a link to the blog post explaining his new method. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://specmap.sequence-omega.net

 

This has been updated to include sprints SMR licenses and the BRS, seems in most places Sprint only has 12mhz?  That's not enough for a 5x5 and 1xAdvanced is it?  Unless the data is incorrect.

 

Thoughts?

 

/b

 

I love what Anthony is doing.  He is obviously very talented in coding methods to pull data automatically.  But his data is not hand massaged, is not always accurate -- especially pertaining to partitions and disaggregations.  I have long advised people to use his maps only as thumbnail sketches.

 

In this case, the FCC ULS is at fault.  SMR 800 MHz is in disarray during the Public Safety rebanding process.  For now, the ULS indicates that Sprint holds the rebanded SMR X block 12 MHz license:  818-824 MHz x 863-869 MHz.  However, across most of the country, Sprint controls an additional 1 MHz below both the uplink and downlink for the following total:  817-824 MHz x 862-869 MHz.

 

In short, that is 7 MHz FDD -- sufficient for one CDMA1X carrier, one LTE 5 MHz FDD carrier, and guard bands.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does the map when you filter under SMR 800 (806-824) show that Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Tucson and San Antonio do not have any SMR licenses?  Since the author pulls these records from the FCC, is this just an error with the FCC's documentation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does the map when you filter under SMR 800 (806-824) show that Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Tucson and San Antonio do not have any SMR licenses?  Since the author pulls these records from the FCC, is this just an error with the FCC's documentation?

 

In the FCC ULS, SMR 800 MHz is separated into several different service codes.  Only one those service codes, YH, is for rebanded SMR 800 MHz spectrum.  That is the data that Anthony pulled down.  If no rebanded licenses have been issued, then his data does not reflect that Sprint holds unrebanded YC/YF/YG service code spectrum that will be converted to YC in due time.

 

Eric, since you are in LA, this is for you...

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=8347

 

That is only one of many, but proof that Sprint still holds active SMR 800 MHz licenses in those markets.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the FCC ULS, SMR 800 MHz is separated into several different service codes.  Only one those service codes, YH, is for rebanded SMR 800 MHz spectrum.  That is the data that Anthony pulled down.  If no rebanded licenses have been issued, then his data does not reflect that Sprint holds unrebanded YC/YF/YG service code spectrum that will be converted to YC in due time.

 

Eric, since you are in LA, this is for you...

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=8347

 

That is only one of many, but proof that Sprint still holds active SMR 800 MHz licenses in those markets.

 

AJ

 

thanks for the link.  I didn't doubt that the So Cal area lost the 800 Mhz spectrum.  I was just curious why the map didn't reflect that it had 800 MHz in the southwest markets along CA, AZ and TX.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...