Jump to content

Cisco CEO predicts that mobile data prices will ‘come down rapidly’


kckid

Recommended Posts

“Price points are going to come down rapidly,” said Chambers. “Transport will become free… Architectures will change. With intelligence throughout the network, the network will become the platform of the future.”

 

http://bgr.com/2013/05/30/cisco-ceo-chambers-interview-mobile-data-prices/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And note that he doesn't actually say how this is going to make it cheaper and better, just that it will happen...

 

I just don't see how WiFi offloading is going to make VZW and AT&T lower their pricing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps pricing will stagnate, but drop? No way. But they are trumpeting price drops by saying the average consumer used 300MB of data two years ago, and now uses 3GB. Since monthly costs for these plans have not risen, or have slightly, the cost per MB consumed has plummeted!

 

So we all can be happy that prices are dropping, but none of us see any discount in our monthly bill. Once these companies stop expanding LTE and get in a maintenance mode, their LTE networks will deliver GB's and TB's at much cheaper rates than their old 3G networks. Even more savings to be realized by the wireless companies.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps pricing will stagnate, but drop? No way. But they are trumpeting price drops by saying the average consumer used 300MB of data two years ago, and now uses 3GB. Since monthly costs for these plans have not risen, or have slightly, the cost per MB consumed has plummeted!

 

So we all can be happy that prices are dropping, but none of us see any discount in our monthly bill. Once these companies stop expanding LTE and get in a maintenance mode, their LTE networks will deliver GB's and TB's at much cheaper rates than their old 3G networks. Even more savings to be realized by the wireless companies.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

IF Softbank successfully completes the Sprint transaction, IF Softbank/Sprint are able to integrate the Clearwire spectrum, and IF Softbank/Sprint moves in the same direction in the US as Softbank has moved in Japan, we may continue to see unlimited data, but significantly more aggressive pricing.  Softbank's growth in Japan has to some degree resulted from taking subscribers away from the Japanese incumbents.  IF this strategy can be repeated in the US, then Verizon and AT&T will begin to see erosion in their subscriber base, and will be forced to become more price-competitive.

 

That's a lot of IF's, and certainly won't have an immediate effect on mobile pricing, but may force the US mobile industry toward more a reasonable price structure in the 3-5 year time frame.

 

The effect of vastly increased WiFi access is a wild card in this game. The infrastructure cost of expanded WiFi will be enormous, and Chambers really doesn't address the question of who will pay for it, and how, but it is obvious that is won't really be "free".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF Softbank successfully completes the Sprint transaction, IF Softbank/Sprint are able to integrate the Clearwire spectrum, and IF Softbank/Sprint moves in the same direction in the US as Softbank has moved in Japan, we may continue to see unlimited data, but significantly more aggressive pricing. Softbank's growth in Japan has to some degree resulted from taking subscribers away from the Japanese incumbents. IF this strategy can be repeated in the US, then Verizon and AT&T will begin to see erosion in their subscriber base, and will be forced to become more price-competitive.

 

That's a lot of IF's, and certainly won't have an immediate effect on mobile pricing, but may force the US mobile industry toward more a reasonable price structure in the 3-5 year time frame.

 

The effect of vastly increased WiFi access is a wild card in this game. The infrastructure cost of expanded WiFi will be enormous, and Chambers really doesn't address the question of who will pay for it, and how, but it is obvious that is won't really be "free".

I have a few solutions for cost effective WiFi offloading. I call it the internet box. Pennies on the dollar of existing cell networks. Also this does not mean I want to broadcast on 2.4 GHz out of a tower, that is senseless. Also free is not going to pay for the network, however the price point would be very disruptive given current options for reliable personal internet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Price drops certainly haven't shown up on the wireline side.   They just bump speeds up and set the tiers such that it keeps in the higher speed buckets.

 

(seriously cox, I have a choice of 3 down, .75 up, or 30 down / 5 up?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
    • Interesting, I saw this too on my AT&T S22 while roaming on US Cellular. I thought it was an Android bug since CellMapper was doing the same thing (didn't get a screenshot of that one). N66 makes more sense than N1. 
    • Thanks, that was good timing, I did see your report as I was buttoning up this latest update and added an override for that.. did it not work?   Ok, was that on AT&T also? Please send a report if you happen to see it again and safely have the opportunity. You can always do the long-press on the fly and then send a later one with an explanation pointing to the earlier one.. your username is attached to the long-press reports, so it's not an issue.
    • I sent a report in earlier, n66 reporting as n1. There should be two different reports, I couldn't find the button the first time so I just long pressed the connection type to send, then I remembered where it was. I put a note about the issue on the 2nd report. Both reports from me are for the same issue. Also, it might have been on a prior release but earlier this week I also saw n66 reported as n65 on the app. I was driving and wasn't able to send a report in for that one. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...