Jump to content

iPhone 5 (Verizon 3G Data roam)


Danielj1981

Recommended Posts

OK, that makes sense now...

 

It makes sense that Sprint, Verizon, and the Fruit Company wouldn't let iPhones authenticated on one network to not authenticated on the other. What kind of carrier file black magic it would take to break that? I have no clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's possible to roam on Verizon LTE without hacking their network. When I force roam on Verizon on my devices here in New Mexico, it first tries to connect to Verizon eHRPD. And then it fails to authenticate and then tries EVDO-A, which does authenticate and connects to data.

 

Why doesn't it allow me to connect to VZW eHRPD? Because the eHRPD is run through VZW's LTE core. So if we cannot authenticate to eHRPD, we probably cannot to LTE either. I believe that the allowed roaming networks for eHRPD and LTE come from the SIM card and not the PRL. I believe it would take hacking VZW's network to allow it to authorize your device on to their network. Otherwise, I don't think it will happen until Sprint and VZW work out a deal, and VZW opens up their eHRPD/LTE network to Sprint devices and authorizes their SIM profile to the network.

 

 

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

After NV and Verizon's huge user numbers have saturated their LTE network down to where they are getting Smoked by Sprint's LTE speeds, it will be Verizon wanting to strike a deal to roam onto Sprints NV towers....haha J/k dare to dream tho! :-)

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For verification I have successfully forced my iPhone 5 that is jailbroken running 6.1.2 to use the Verizon 3G network be default. The process involved downloading a PRL (can be found by Googling) and watching a YouTube video on how to change the PRL over.

 

Once the process was completed I was connected to the Verizon towers and generally getting between 1.5 - 2.5 Mbps download speeds. This compares to the 0.05 Mbps speeds I was receiving via Sprint 3G. I had this PRL set for about 20 days before I started getting close to the 300 MB limit at which point a ran the ##UPDATE# command to set back the standard Sprint PRL.

 

This process does count towards your roaming on Sprint, and will show up on your account as roaming. I wouldn't recommend this method unless you are usually connected to WIFI, as you can quickly reach the 300 MB limit.

 

I can try and find the PRL and video that I followed if there's interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No please do not post it here. There are many many flaws with that PRL. Not to mention gray areas of roaming all the time. If someone needs that PRL all the time they need to switch to that carrier.

 

I would love to see someone run that PRL near the border or on a cruise ship. It would look like you are not roaming at all due to the PRL creator's severe inexperience. Rack of a huge roaming bill and not know it.. All due to the ignorance of running that 100% roaming PRL. Would serve them right.

 

Hate that PRL with a passion... Can you tell?

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No please do not post it here. There are many many flaws with that PRL. Not to mention gray areas of roaming all the time. If someone needs that PRL all the time they need to switch to that carrier.

 

I would love to see someone run that PRL near the border or on a cruise ship. It would look like you are not roaming at all due to the PRL creator's severe inexperience. Rack of a huge roaming bill and not know it.. All due to the ignorance of running that 100% roaming PRL. Would serve them right.

 

Hate that PRL with a passion... Can you tell?

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

Haha... Yes it would serve them right. No reason not to allow people to make their own decisions. Natural selection... Don't play with things you don't understand enough to control.

 

FWIW I have several PRLs that I toggle between as needed, including a couple that are VZW-only. Only irritant with when I load any of VZW-only ones is, the phone will not connect to Sprint LTE and fall back on VZW 3G. It's just full-time VZW, basically as if I owned a Verizon 4S or something. If I could figure out how to make the preference Sprint LTE --> VZW 3G --> Sprint 3G --> Sprint 1X --> VZW 1X for data, and Sprint -> VZW for voice, that would be pretty sweet. Then I might leave that PRL up pretty much always. As it stands, I run 560xx PRLs by default, which is pretty decent most days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Someone told me a couple years ago, that there were problems getting certain modems to aggregate overlapping spectrum even if the overlapping parts were actually blanked. So I think there might be firmware issues that need to be resolved first, which T-Mobile might not consider worth the effort for 4MHz at this time.
    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
    • Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...