Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upper Central Valley Market (Sacramento, Stockton, Redding, Eureka & Reno/Lake Tahoe)


iwalkthrowwalls

Recommended Posts

Nope. Sprint antennas are on Arco Arena.

 

Basic sponsors have access to my created map that has exact address and locations of all Sprint cell sites in our market along with their current status if you're interested in that sort of knowledge. 

 

Do you or anyone know who operates out of the Inderkum football field tower? And what sort of work are they doing there? Seems interesting that they put up a mobile cell tower while doing work on the pre-existing tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you or anyone know who operates out of the Inderkum football field tower? And what sort of work are they doing there? Seems interesting that they put up a mobile cell tower while doing work on the pre-existing tower.

 

I and many others here can identify whose equipment belongs to who from good quality pictures of antennas, radio heads, and cabinets. Most active carrier right now other than Sprint is Verizon who's been busy for the past 9 months upgrading their network to AWS capability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Sprint antennas are on Arco Arena.

 

Basic sponsors have access to my created map that has exact address and locations of all Sprint cell sites in our market along with their current status if you're interested in that sort of knowledge. 

Also, where on Arco are the Sprint towers? I think you told me before once that there are towers on Arco, but I want to know where they are attached. I'll need to look closer at Arco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, where on Arco are the Sprint towers? I think you told me before once that there are towers on Arco, but I want to know where they are attached. I'll need to look closer at Arco.

 

I wold guess it's up somewhere on the roof and probably hidden behind parapets which you can see on Google maps / earth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wold guess it's up somewhere on the roof and probably hidden behind parapets which you can see on Google maps / earth.

What's aws capadability?

I read that part of nv 2.0 rollout is upgrading towers to esmr800, so for example are the towers that are accepted here in roseville esmr800 accepted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's aws capadability?

I read that part of nv 2.0 rollout is upgrading towers to esmr800, so for example are the towers that are accepted here in roseville esmr800 accepted?

 

1700/2100.

 

No. eSMR 800 LTE requires eCSFB compliance (NV 3G + eCSFB software update) and cluster launching in addition to backhaul. Roseville has none of those and none are planned yet for this area. Closest place that might get LTE 800 anytime soon is probably Modesto area or up in Yuba city or down towards Dixon / Vacaville. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1700/2100.

 

No. eSMR 800 LTE requires eCSFB compliance (NV 3G + eCSFB software update) and cluster launching in addition to backhaul. Roseville has none of those and none are planned yet for this area. Closest place that might get LTE 800 anytime soon is probably Modesto area or up in Yuba city or down towards Dixon / Vacaville.

Esmr 800 LTE reaches further rite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's why rite now sprint and T-Mobile ate struggling in rural coverage?

 

In rural spacing one 700/800 mhz tower can cover the distance of about 3 PCS 1900 towers.

 

Not to mention Verizon and ATT went on a buying spree and bought out many rural carriers which helped a lot since they didn't have to build out native coverage ($billions with little to gain). Sprint and T-mobile has no such liberties but Sprint is fighting back with their alliance with CCA & NetAmerica announced about two weeks ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In rural spacing one 700/800 mhz tower can cover the distance of about 3 PCS 1900 towers.

 

Not to mention Verizon and ATT went on a buying spree and bought out the rural carriers which helped a lot since they didn't have to build out native coverage. Sprint and T-mobile has no such liberties but Sprint is fighting back with their alliance with CCA & NetAmerica announced about two weeks ago.

Ah ic. But verizon and at&t are kinda struggling with LTE capacity cause of there LTE only running on 700/800mhz towers? And that's why verizon is rolling out aws capadability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ic. But verizon and at&t are kinda struggling with LTE capacity cause of there LTE only running on 700/800mhz towers? And that's why verizon is rolling out aws capadability?

 

Exactly.

 

Verizon main LTE band (10x10 750mhz) was overloaded to hell nationwide and they had to do something and thus am rolling out another LTE carrier to offload capacity. I believe they are able to use 15x15  in Sacramento after their spectrum swap with T-mobile a few months back. 

 

ATTs micromanaging their network extremely efficiently due to their very diverse amount of spectrum. In Sacramento, ATT has a 5mhz FDD-LTE 700 B17 carrier. They'll most likely aggregate it with the 10mhz of AWS they have to increase capacity and speeds.

 

Sprint has the absolute most potential capacity with 20 mhz total of PCS / full 7 mhz of eSMR 800 along with 55 mhz of BRS 2500 and at least 40+ mhz of EBS 2600. They just have to deploy it ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly.

 

Verizon main LTE band (10x10 750mhz) was overloaded to hell nationwide and they had to do something and thus am rolling out another LTE carrier to offload capacity. I believe they are able to use 15x15 in Sacramento after their spectrum swap with T-mobile a few months back.

 

ATTs micromanaging their network extremely efficiently due to their very diverse amount of spectrum. In Sacramento, ATT has a 5mhz FDD-LTE 700 B17 carrier. They'll most likely aggregate it with the 10mhz of AWS they have to increase capacity and speeds.

 

Sprint has the absolute most potential capacity with 20 mhz total of PCS / full 7 mhz of eSMR 800 along with 55 mhz of BRS 2500 and at east 40+ mhz of EBS 2600. They just have to deploy it ...

Wow interesting info!

And that's why Verizon and ATT can't offer unlimited data cause of capacity? Or is there another reason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow interesting info!

And that's why Verizon and ATT can't offer unlimited data cause of capacity? Or is there another reason?

 

Capacity and the want to squeeze more money out of existing subs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But better for sprint and T-Mobile. The nv accepted 3g in elk grove does it run on 800 or not?

Check Sponsor maps. It has detailed information about NV accepted towers.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3724-upper-central-valley-market-network-vision-permits-progress/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like UC Davis finally hooked up fiber to the Sprint site there!

 

 

really?  I'm sitting directly under the site right now and am on 3G.  I did a profile update and had LTE for about 3 seconds and went straight back to 3G, but that has been the behavior here for the past couple weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...