Jump to content

AT&T talking to LEAP in last ditch effort to sell T-Mo's assets.

legion125

By legion125
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

legion125 Member Level: 4G WiMax

legion125

Posted
Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 29 November 2011

 

I think this is AT&T's last best chance for success. I would guess that if this doesn't work then the merger is done I think to make this happen both AT&T and DT will be doing some heavy financing and offering extremely friendly terms to LEAP.

 

 

 

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/...eap/2011-11-29

 

 

 

Report: AT&T 'knee-deep' in talks to sell T-Mobile assets to Leap

 

November 29, 2011 — 10:14am ET | By Phil Goldstein

 

 

AT&T (NYSE:T) is "knee-deep" in last-ditch talks with Cricket provider Leap Wireless (

NASDAQ:LEAP) to sell Leap substantial assets of T-Mobile USA in a bid to keep AT&T's $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile afloat, according to a report in the New York Times.

 

The report, which cited unnamed sources familiar with the matter, said AT&T hopes such a deal would calm concerns at the Department of Justice, which has sued to block the deal on antitrust grounds. The report said such a sale would make Leap the fourth-largest wireless carrier in the country but would still leave AT&T with enough of T-Mobile's spectrum to make the deal worthwhile.

 

Leap spokesman Greg Lund declined to comment on the report, and an AT&T spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

For Leap to become the fourth-largest wireless carrier by subscribers, AT&T would have to sell Leap at least 40 percent, if not more, of T-Mobile's subscribers and spectrum, a figure that has been discussed in previous reports. T-Mobile ended the third quarter with 33.7 million subscribers, while Leap ended the period with around 5.8 million total customers. Leap's larger prepaid rival

MetroPCS

 

(NASDAQ:PCS) counted over 9.1 million subscribers at the end of the third quarter.

 

The Times article described AT&T's attempts to sell to Leap as a "Hail Mary pass," and indeed it seems that AT&T's options to offload T-Mobile assets through divestitures are dwindling. Leap has around $800 million in cash and short-term investments, compared with $2.1 billion for MetroPCS. According to a Bloomberg report, which also cited unnamed sources, MetroPCS is not interested in buying T-Mobile customers and spectrum in as many markets as AT&T needs to sell.

 

Last week AT&T said it withdrew its application for the T-Mobile acquisition from the FCC so that it could concentrate on it legal battle with the Department of Justice. That trial is set to begin Feb. 13. U.S. District Judge Ellen Huvelle, who is overseeing the case, postponed a hearing in the case set for Wednesday until Dec. 9 "due to the court's scheduling conflict."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SDherron Member Level: Analog

SDherron

Posted
Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 29 November 2011

 

I think this is ridiculous. It's a desperate move by AT&T. I don't see how the FCC can find that the merger would make the wireless market uncompetitive in 99 of the top 100 markets in the U.S., but a 40% divestiture will satisfy the Feds. It won't be enough. They will just run the same competitive scenario numbers again and will find that even with a 40% divestiture the merger will make the wireless market uncompetitive in 90 in the top 100 markets.

 

40% is too small. Verizon had to part with almost 40% of Alltel to satisfy the Feds back in 2008. And Alltel wasn't even half the size of T-Mobile. And the market was much more diverse and competitve then.

 

I just don't see AT&T getting there myself. And I'm glad for it!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SDherron Member Level: Analog

SDherron

Posted
Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 29 November 2011

 

Yeah...there are not many wireless co's out there that are smaller than Verizon, but big enough to buy a sizeable portion of Tmo. Especially given today;s current economic environment. AT&T does not have a lot of divestiture partners that it can count on to help them out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
legion125 Member Level: 4G WiMax

legion125

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 30 November 2011

 

With Metro PCS, AT&T had a chance to make this work since Metro PCS is sitting on gobs of money. Alas, they only wanted enough spectrum to expand in markets according to its business plan. Which means Metro doesn't want to be a national player. I have no clue what Leap wants to be. Maybe they want spectrum, but I don't see how they would pay for it. They only have a fourth of the capital that Metro has. If somehow they pull this off with its current model, the customer defections would be stupendous unless they think they can metamorphous into a national player overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
legion125 Member Level: 4G WiMax

legion125

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 2 December 2011

 

I think based on this article that AT&T will do a joint venture with T-Mobile if/when the court case falls through. This will be a win/win for T-mo, its customers and consumers. T-mobile would have a good chance or staying profitable and gain customers and be able to offer LTE, and AT&T would gain the spectrum it desires.

http://www.bgr.com/2...er-falls-apart/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • chamb
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By chamb · Posted

      Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • chamb
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By chamb · Posted

      Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)
    • wispiANt
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By wispiANt · Posted

      I found a multi-carrier oDAS node at the corner of Bushwick Ave & Cedar St. You can see an upgraded Verizon macro deployment behind the node, and T-Mobile has a fully upgraded site only a block away. So, the only thing that makes sense is that this is an AT&T node with LTE+mmWave (or maybe C-Band).
    • JossMan
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By JossMan · Posted

      I tried going into a Boost Mobile store and they wouldn't sell me a rainbow SIM card, said that it would be dead as soon as I put it in the Moto Edge 2023... which I know is bs... 
    • Trip
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Trip · Posted

      They didn't do all 2.5 with the Sprint merger, so I'm not sure why they would do that for USCC in areas arguably more rural. But I'm 100% sure they'll swap out the gear. - Trip

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...