Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

definitely fiber. I don't think sub one hundred pings are possible on anything else.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

I think you can. I have gotten as low as 76 down here in Alamogordo and we are not on fiber.

 

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

definitely fiber. I don't think sub one hundred pings are possible on anything else.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

I ran the test several times and all tests were below 100. Pretty good ping considering it was rush hour at that intersection

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you can. I have gotten as low as 76 down here in Alamogordo and we are not on fiber.

 

{style_image_url}/attachicon.gif image.jpg

Multiple T1 lines? Anyone else want to chime in on that 7x ms ping being anything but fiber? Maybe a very short run of copper to the fiber trunk line?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had an EVDO ping below 100ms on T1 lines. Possible but not common.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran the test several times and all tests were below 100. Pretty good ping considering it was rush hour at that intersection

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

That is a very good sign of fiber. Mine was about four good test over a couple of minutes. Haven't gotten below 100 since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So have there been any sites anywhere in the country where cl backhaul has been installed that anyone here knows about??

 

Yes.  They did pretty well in Austin, Nashville, Jacksonville, Minnesota (except Duluth).  They are still waiting for backhaul in Duluth.  But the majority of the cities with little to no LTE sites in the Sprint network are CenturyLink.  CL also has a lot of sites in some major cities like Phoenix and Las Vegas too.  They are going to need to get theirs going soon, as Cox is nearly complete on all their sites in those markets.  CenturyLink is a factory of sadness.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes me wanna dump them for my home internet lol

Yes.  They did pretty well in Austin, Nashville, Jacksonville, Minnesota (except Duluth).  They are still waiting for backhaul in Duluth.  But the majority of the cities with little to no LTE sites in the Sprint network are CenturyLink.  CL also has a lot of sites in some major cities like Phoenix and Las Vegas too.  They are going to need to get theirs going soon, as Cox is nearly complete on all their sites in those markets.  CenturyLink is a factory of sadness.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes me wanna dump them for my home internet lol

 

We just went with Comcast blast internet after leaving CL. Even though I hate Comcast too, we subscribed to 50 Mbps but we have been consistently getting 70 Mbps...winning!

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We just went with Comcast blast internet after leaving CL. Even though I hate Comcast too, we subscribed to 50 Mbps but we have been consistently getting 70 Mbps...winning!

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

To be fair, the new boxes they have like the X1 are decent. That said, they still have a lot to improve on their customer services in most places. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, the new boxes they have like the X1 are decent. That said, they still have a lot to improve on their customer services in most places.

x1 Cable box or modem? I just use my own docsis 3.0 modem.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I picked up the Montano and Unser 1x800 signal again today and attempted to make a call.  It failed to go through and after about twenty seconds it jumped to 1900 1x and went through.  Dang Ericsson, get your act together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I picked up the Montano and Unser 1x800 signal again today and attempted to make a call.  It failed to go through and after about twenty seconds it jumped to 1900 1x and went through.  Dang Ericsson, get your act together. 

 

That's the Note 2 problem on 800.  That's the problem I had no matter whether I was on Samsung, AlcaLu or Ericsson on CDMA 800.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was on the nexus 5....any other confirmed Ericsson markets with the n5?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

There is a lot of CDMA 800 live in Kansas and Houston.  You could check with those guys.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the tower on old coors and sunset gardens sw is a high use tower I spotted 4 per sector with 3 sectors. Its a very large tower with multiple carriers on it, so I guess thats expected from a tower that size and in the area with minimal towers in that area.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the tower on old coors and sunset gardens sw is a high use tower I spotted 4 per sector with 3 sectors. Its a very large tower with multiple carriers on it, so I guess thats expected from a tower that size and in the area with minimal towers in that area.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Yep. From what I've noticed, most of the towers along Coors are high capacity sites.  I hope when the start firing up LTE we have both band 25 and 26.  I also wonder if the current spacing is sufficient for TD-LTE on the west side.  In the heights, tower spacing is so much tighter (due mostly to flagpole sites here and there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. From what I've noticed, most of the towers along Coors are high capacity sites.  I hope when the start firing up LTE we have both band 25 and 26.  I also wonder if the current spacing is sufficient for TD-LTE on the west side.  In the heights, tower spacing is so much tighter (due mostly to flagpole sites here and there)

 

Most of the ABQ sites east of the river are spaced well enough for at least continuous outdoor Band 41 coverage.  Sites in the NE Heights, South Valley and West Mesa are spaced too far apart for overlapping Band 41 coverage in many cases.  

 

Band 41 will not work indoors in the fringe areas between most sites in ABQ as is.  You would fall back to Band 25 and/or 26 in those locations.  However, Sprint says they will be densifying Band 41 coverage in the Top 100 markets before the end of 2016.  So more sites will likely be added around ABQ still in the coming year or two.

 

I wouldn't mind Band 41 in the areas within 1/2-3/4 mile of a site, and falling back to Band 25/26 in all other locations.  That will work well, and be superior to Tmo and AT&T's networks at their build out.  And will perform similar to VZW network in ABQ when they finish building out a 15MHz AWS LTE network overlay.  Because AWS LTE will also cause islands with only LTE 750 in between.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's odd that we had so many 3g acceptances in abq and now they have died off. Maybe the towers in rr aren't complete? Maybe Ericsson wants to wait on backhaul to accept lte at the same time?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's odd that we had so many 3g acceptances in abq and now they have died off. Maybe the towers in rr aren't complete? Maybe Ericsson wants to wait on backhaul to accept lte at the same time?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Something fishy is happening.  No acceptances in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • My hope is they can spot something in the data that was exported. I am going after all 4 carriers on a multitude of phones and Android versions. My S24 did work.  I have not checked another S24 or S22.  S21s failed which are on Android 14 as well. It should be noted I did not reboot after updates and some of the data was captured on the prior update. Data from some new Boost Mobile Dish (Echostar) sites in the Wheeling area did make it in. Was hoping for more SA data from the duo. Many of the phones are just LTE.
    • I was traveling for a couple of days.   Sunday evening, I upload from 3 phones.  A S-22 and two Moto 5G phones.  Everything looked ok.    How do we explain that?   One person has issues and another person does not.  All my phones have the latest update.
    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...