Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Columbus Market


Recommended Posts

Posted

Carroll\Lancaster has LTE again.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Are you experiencing drops to 3G in Lancaster? I live north of 161, which doesn't get any 800mhz service. Because of no 'backup band' to hand off to when on (fringe) LTE signal, my service drops. I've experienced it on every tower north of 161, and no matter how many calls I make to Care, they refuse to acknowledges that there is a problem nor has it been resolved.
  • Like 1
Posted

For a few days I was getting no LTE at the Carroll location where I also got LTE. Now it's back. Maybe they were messing with it.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Posted

For a few days I was getting no LTE at the Carroll location where I also got LTE. Now it's back. Maybe they were messing with it.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Can you do a speed test or give any more info on your local towers?

 

If you read The Wall on the front page of S4GRU, you will note that some towers in Columbus on B25 are transmitting 10x10, which is basically like a double connection. Assuming you are on B25 at the time of the speed test, if you get above 37MB/s, that tower may have gone 10x10. We don't have anyone reporting in your neck of the woods, so anything you post is appreciated. This is also a good time to remind you of the plethora of info you get for 6 month at a time with a $10+ dontation..... And even more once you have donated $100 total or more.

 

Trust me, as a cheap bastard, it's worth every penny to geek out on :D

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

The Easton mall area must have had some work done cause my data is just zipping by it wasn't this good before. This speed test proves it. I can't wait until I get a CA device! 7373926b188de924297efef4f5dd7f0a.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by derrph
  • Like 2
Posted

The Easton mall area must have had some work done cause my data is just zipping by it wasn't this good before. This speed test proves it. I can't wait until I get a CA device! 7373926b188de924297efef4f5dd7f0a.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where at in Easton?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Where at in Easton?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I was by the Cheesecake Factory. Even when I was getting on the freeway to 670I still busted out 35 up.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by derrph
  • Like 1
Posted

I was by the Cheesecake Factory. Even when I was getting on the freeway to 670I still busted out 35 up.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lately that area has been having no service about 2am every day for the past week or so
Posted (edited)

derrph, on 22 Aug 2015 - 6:41 PM, said:

 

The Easton mall area must have had some work done cause my data is just zipping by it wasn't this good before. This speed test proves it. I can't wait until I get a CA device! 7373926b188de924297efef4f5dd7f0a.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think you're connecting to band 41 at that range, since it's located at the Hilton. I work at Chase at Easton and we do not get band 41 in my location due to several big buildings being in the way, so the speeds are not nearly that great.

 

Actually, you may be on to something. Just ran a Speedtest and I got 7 down, normally my speeds have been in 1.5-2.5 down. I'm at -119 dbon band 25 here, 41 can't reach me here.

Edited by andycapps
Posted

The Easton mall area must have had some work done cause my data is just zipping by it wasn't this good before. This speed test proves it. I can't wait until I get a CA device!

 

Yeah, how about we do not run too many more e-penis speed tests when the network just transparently works?  As your screenshot shows, you just needlessly pumped 87 MB through the network.  Do that repeatedly, then multiply it by many others doing the same, and those 87 MB speed tests are reducing available capacity for everyone.

 

An occasional speed test out of curiosity is fine.  But do not make a habit out of running speed tests.  The amounts of data that they consume are growing insane.

 

AJ

Posted

Yeah, how about we do not run too many more e-penis speed tests when the network just transparently works? As your screenshot shows, you just needlessly pumped 87 MB through the network. Do that repeatedly, then multiply it by many others doing the same, and those 87 MB speed tests are reducing available capacity for everyone.

 

An occasional speed test out of curiosity is fine. But do not make a habit out of running speed tests. The amounts of data that they consume are growing insane.

 

AJ

On my way to do my speed test at Easton around 2p....Need to make sure it works!

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

Yeah, how about we do not run too many more e-penis speed tests when the network just transparently works? As your screenshot shows, you just needlessly pumped 87 MB through the network. Do that repeatedly, then multiply it by many others doing the same, and those 87 MB speed tests are reducing available capacity for everyone.

 

An occasional speed test out of curiosity is fine. But do not make a habit out of running speed tests. The amounts of data that they consume are growing insane.

 

AJ

I rarely do them. That day I was on FaceTime and it didn't skip a beat like it normally would in that area. So I had to see so I ran a quick test and that was the reason why it was butter smooth.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

I rarely do them. That day I was on FaceTime and it didn't skip a beat like it normally would in that area. So I had to see so I ran a quick test and that was the reason why it was butter smooth.

 

And that is fine -- it is an infrequent speed test out of curiosity/diagnosis.  I do like that the Ookla Speedtest app is now showing the data used.  Some people on "unlimited" data will not care, will continue to mash the speed test button, and that is sad.  But the amounts of data used may give more conscientious users pause, realizing that they may be contributing to less available capacity and slower speeds for everyone.

 

AJ

Posted

And that is fine -- it is an infrequent speed test out of curiosity/diagnosis. I do like that the Ookla Speedtest app is now showing the data used. Some people on "unlimited" data will not care, will continue to mash the speed test button, and that is sad. But the amounts of data used may give more conscientious users pause, realizing that they may be contributing to less available capacity and slower speeds for everyone.

 

AJ

I agree but what's the point is doing speed tests all day long? What are people getting out of it.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I agree but what's the point is doing speed tests all day long? What are people getting out of it.

 

I do not understand it either.  But some people think that they are furthering the cause and educating others by running repeated speed tests, showing off impressive speeds or shaming slow speeds.  The anachronism of "unlimited" data has enabled this speed test bad behavior.  People who actually pay for the amounts of data they use do not waste much on unnecessary speed tests.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Posted

I do not understand it either. But some people think that they are furthering the cause and educating others by running repeated speed tests, showing off impressive speeds or shaming slow speeds. The anachronism of "unlimited" data has enabled this speed test bad behavior. People who actually pay for the amounts of data they use do not waste much on unnecessary speed tests.

 

AJ

They really don't. I think the main people who pound that button all day are tech heads who undying love for this stuff. I showed my friend that screen shot of these speeds and he said what does that mean I don't understand it. That right there proves the point that the average person don't care as long as they can do they need to do on their phone. But there are people who are speed obsessed and live by that app.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I do not understand it either. But some people think that they are furthering the cause and educating others by running repeated speed tests, showing off impressive speeds or shaming slow speeds. The anachronism of "unlimited" data has enabled this speed test bad behavior. People who actually pay for the amounts of data they use do not waste much on unnecessary speed tests.

 

AJ

Did you know that TMo encourages speedtests, so much so that it doesn't count against your data? And you can even do it on an unactivated SIM.

 

What makes Sprint different so much so that you're saying it is killing the network?

 

For the record, I'm on an unlimited Sprint plan. I used 3GB of data last cycle, of which 1.24GB was speedtests (600MB of that was from 1 tower in a 5 min period).

  • Like 1
Posted

Did you know that TMo encourages speedtests, so much so that it doesn't count against your data? And you can even do it on an unactivated SIM.

Did you know that the T-Mobile "data strong" network speeds have been declining, have not looked so pretty in recent RootMetrics results? Maybe whitelisting speed tests and violating the spirit of Net Neutrality with "Music Freedom" is coming home to roost.

 

What makes Sprint different so much so that you're saying it is killing the network?

That is hyperbole. And I ask that you stop it. I never said "killing" the network. Do not ascribe to me extreme viewpoints that I do not state.

 

For the record, I'm on an unlimited Sprint plan. I used 3GB of data last cycle, of which 1.24GB was speedtests (600MB of that was from 1 tower in a 5 min period).

Well, in your 1.24 GB worth of speed tests, you effectively put two more of me on the network last month -- because I trend around 600-700 MB of on network data usage per month.  So, for an analogy, start occasionally but simultaneously driving three cars instead of one.  Have hundreds or thousands of other people in your area do likewise.  Then, tell me that highway congestion will not increase.

 

"Unlimited" data needs to be priced appropriately or die a fiery death.  Otherwise, it just invites misuse.

 

AJ

Posted

For the record, I'm on an unlimited Sprint plan. I used 3GB of data last cycle, of which 1.24GB was speedtests (600MB of that was from 1 tower in a 5 min period).

 

I will add this addendum.  If you want to pay for a 3 GB tiered data plan and use almost half of it for speed tests, more power to you.  That is your choice.

 

AJ

Posted

He pays for unlimited.... Why does he need a 3gb tiered plan?

 

His monthly usage is low, not everyone has the luxury to be on WiFi all the time like some people!

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

I have a tiered plan. Lots of times I have lots of data left over on it so when I'm near the end of the month, I can burn a few speed tests to see how VZW is doing here. But yeah, using Ookla on a provider with no white list makes you think twice about it.

 

Part of me wonders if speed test isn't pushed to the front of the data line.

Posted

I know the weather got cool but I didn't know it was cold enough for the elves er trolls. Geez really? Do you tick off every little byte on your bill to make sure you didn't waste any data?

Posted

I know the weather got cool but I didn't know it was cold enough for the elves er trolls. Geez really? Do you tick off every little byte on your bill to make sure you didn't waste any data?

 

I think it brings up a greater transparency as to how much data is wasted on frivolous speed tests. When I'm on the train, I want to enjoy Youtube without buffering because some jackhole is showing off his e-peen speeds by running speedtests again and again.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think it brings up a greater transparency as to how much data is wasted on frivolous speed tests. When I'm on the train, I want to enjoy Youtube without buffering because some jackhole is showing off his e-peen speeds by running speedtests again and again.

I'll just say that whatever I'm using my paid for data to do at the time is my business as long as I'm not breaking any laws. It's what is important to me at the time. Nobody has any business telling me what I can or can't do with something that I've paid for. On principle alone you have it wrong. It's like buying a sandwich, but only allowed to eat half because there are starving people in the world.

  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Well you officially fried my brain. Many of these topics are well beyond my very rudimentary amateur knowledge.. this has my head spinning even more than usual. When someone figures it out, just let me know what I need to do with the app! 😂
    • Confusingly, there are two different types of Cell IDs, the NR Cell ID (NCI) and the Local Cell ID, which I will call the LCID from here on out. From my understanding, @Trip is trying to get the LCID from the NCI but the same gNB is showing up for multiple sites in the app. Some background for those that don’t know about NCIs (NR Cell ID) and how they relate to gNBs and LCIDs. Just like the E/GCI which is comprised of the eNB + LCID with the eNB denoting the site, the NCI is comprised of the gNB + LCID with the gNB denoting the site. A major difference is that the eNB is a fixed number of bits in the E/GCI but the gNB can vary between 22-32 bits (out of 36) in the NCI and there is nothing transmitted which tells you what the length is. The reason for the mentioning LTE sites is that Verizon’s gNB numbering scheme in most of the USA is based upon the sites eNB (using the rules I mentioned) and a 22-bit gNB. Additionally, their LCIDs start at 25 and increment by compinations of 16 and 1. Basically, it is common to see LCID sets of 25/26/27, 41/42/43, and 57/58/59. Looking at Trip’s data and some other data from the area, they are not following the format used in the rest of the USA.  From what I can tell, they are using a 29-bit or 30-bit gNB (that gives LCIDs that follow Verizon’s standard patterning). 29-bit shares the same gNB across the two locations, while 30-bit splits the two sets: 18504107674 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 26 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 26 (30-bit) 18504107690 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 42 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 42 (30-bit)  18504107691 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 43 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 43 (30-bit)  18504107706 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 58 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 58 (30-bit)  18504107707 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 59 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 59 (30-bit) 18504107738 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 90 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 26 (30-bit)  18504107739 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 91 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 27 (30-bit)  If true, this is a problem for SignalCheck and other mapping apps because this means they are using at least two different gNB lengths depending on the location in the USA.
    • Yeah I can confirm that the status bar is updating correctly and as often as the main app!  Great to have that back after so long. Waiting on the app to pick up the 5G data.  I'm on AT&T and I find that it only reports the 5G signal data a fraction of the time.  Once I can get it to pop back up I'll send a report with the LTE RSRP showing up in the status bar instead of the NR RSRP. I am not sure if it is new behavior with the Beta because I had it set to just show the Band since I couldn't display the band and signal at the same time. Edit:  Sent a diagnostic and here's a screenshot:
    • Yes, for various reasons the beta mapping project was limited to S4GRU sponsors at launch. It's still a work in progress but I have added a few users as it has evolved. I am inclined to leave it as-is for now -- it's not completely off-limits to discuss here (especially if there's an outage), but with so many posts I just try to keep discussions organized. RAvirani handles the map server and he monitors the other thread closer.   I might be confused, but are we talking apples and oranges here? My interpretation was Trip is talking about NR cells on different sites sharing cell IDs as far as the app is concerned, while the other comments are about LTE to NR cell ID calculations?
    • I hope this is true!! The Android development team did claim this bug was fixed several months ago, and it is typical for it to take several releases before changes are included. I was on the Android beta until I got my Pixel 9, now I am back on the public releases. With each monthly update, I have optimistically checked this icon and been disappointed. This would be fantastic to get back!   Could you send some diagnostic reports when you see this please? It is new behavior with QPR Beta 3?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...