Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Columbus Market


abrcrmdl23

Recommended Posts

Looks like someone with a Galaxy Nexus is polluting the map near I-71 and Dublin Granville Rd. Dragging the dark purple where it doesn't belong.

Wasn't me either! I've learned my lesson.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My phone keeps switching back and forth between evdo and ehrpd in the Lincoln village area.

You may be in a area between two cell sites. One may be being worked on or there could be an issue with the one.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet, In my area ( east Columbus between Reynoldsburg and Blacklick ) I drop calls a lot in the last few months and data is usually pretty bad.

 

haven't been following whats going on in your area.. What updates did they do ? Is the speedtest more consistent?

NV stuff. Appears to be consistent.

Posted Image

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rf40928 says: 

 

I've never gotten nearly 2 Mb/s down on 3g with Sprint, but for you it looks good.. I take it your area is pretty much ready for 4G awaiting backhaul

 

---------------------------------------

 

NV stuff. Appears to be consistent.
ejerezy2.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First 800 acceptance!

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

uploadfromtaptalk1375058581073.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First 800 acceptance!

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Coz,  where in Columbus ? is this 'Columbus' out outer areas?  Does this mean these are accepted and could be turned on anytime ?  I didn't see any new "aqua blue" markers notating 800..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the maps, our lte sites are LTE only, no NV 3g or 800 yet, am I looking at that correct?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Correct.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the maps, our lte sites are LTE only, no NV 3g or 800 yet, am I looking at that correct?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Yes, you are correct.

 

NV stuff. Appears to be consistent.

ejerezy2.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

 

Where are you getting these speeds?  Do you know what tower you connect to?

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check the map.... My tower finally accepted, now let's accept my other towers with backhaul please and thanks :)

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Congrats !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea how to get the tower info. I'm using an iPhone 5. I'm up at rt 3 and Maxtown north side of westerville.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 2

You can type *3001#12345#* and hit CALL ... it'll bring up some options and also replace your bars ( at top left ) with an actual signal strength number.. it'll show a lot of stuff.. you can exit out of screen usually by hitting the HOME button..

 

 

Sometimes to exit out you may have to power down.. then on power up everything will be normal except the bars will still have a signal number... To return to the default bars dial *3001#12345#* on your iPhone then press Call.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool. So what on here do you need to determine the tower?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 2

 

Select the “Cell Information” menu option to display a summary of all nearby towers. The “RX” code displays the signal strength of each tower. These RX values are dBm signal strength readings, where lower values means strong signal (so -60 signifies stronger signal than -80). The towers are listed by signal strength, and the top tower is usually the tower your phone is connecting to.

 

Selecting the first tower will take you to a further menu that displays more specific information. The “Freq” value shows the frequency block that the network is using. I.E if  the Freq number is between 128 and 251, the tower is using the 850 MHz Cellular band. If the Freq number is between 512 and 810, the tower is using the 1900MHz PCS band.  So I guess if the value was under 128 it would be 800...

 

 

Hope that helps.  A lot of iPhone users don't know about that code.  Pretty handy since you can look up a lot of stuff without downloading a program from iTunes..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How exactly did you determine that from those screen shots? All Greek to me. Tried to interpret the info based on instructions from a couple posts back, but I guess I don't understand.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Why only lite up lte without 3g or 800,because of the voice hand off and 911?

 

Once 3g and 800 accepted on the tower, will be excited to see voice and data coverage in the area.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why only lite up lte without 3g or 800,because of the voice hand off and 911?

 

Once 3g and 800 accepted on the tower, will be excited to see voice and data coverage in the area.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Correct. 3G must be brought online in clusters to help reduce drop calls with Samsung NV and Legacy Motorola equipment.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...