Jump to content

Cell Tower IDs


Recommended Posts

Is there any data we get from an app like RF Tracker or Network Info that can be used to positively ID what tower we are connected to?I know there is the whole issue about different sectors being assigned different BSID, but does the Network ID or System ID give us anyway to determine exactly what tower we are connected to? What info exactly does the System and Network ID provide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any data we get from an app like RF Tracker or Network Info that can be used to positively ID what tower we are connected to?I know there is the whole issue about different sectors being assigned different BSID, but does the Network ID or System ID give us anyway to determine exactly what tower we are connected to? What info exactly does the System and Network ID provide?

 

The IDS captured by the apps are from the CDMA network hierarchy. There is no resource we know of here that correlates them in a handy table with the Sprint tower IDs. But with the S4GRU maps in hand as a sort of Rosetta Stone, you know where the towers actually are. So when surveying with the apps to capture the CDMA IDs and the coordinates they squawk -- I prefer CDMA Field Test -- it is usually possible to figure out which tower is which. You might need to deliberately circle around each tower site to log all the BSIDs, which typically are sequentially assigned to the three sectors of each tower.

 

Each tower usually fits one of two patterns:

  • All three sector radios broadcast the actual coordinates of the tower.
  • Each sector broadcasts unique coordinates that are offset some distance away, and the three points form a triangle around the tower.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the explanation. Do we have an estimate of what percentage of towers broadcast their true coordinates vs "sectorizes" them? I know my local tower goes the sector route, but I haven't really paid attention to others in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the explanation. Do we have an estimate of what percentage of towers broadcast their true coordinates vs "sectorizes" them? I know my local tower goes the sector route' date=' but I haven't really paid attention to others in the area.[/quote']

 

It varies by market.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile wins more 5G spectrum over AT&T's objections So now it's official?
    • Just got back from Puerto Rico. I spent a lot of time going around the San Juan metro area, predominantly in Viejo San Juan, Santurce, Isla Verde, and a short stop in University Gardens.  T-Mobile's network still performs as well today as it did when I last tested and in my opinion is the best on the island. n41 is still at 100MHz in most areas though I did record a few areas with only 80MHz. Yesterday the FCC announced that they're finally granting T-Mobile their Auction 108 winnings so we'll probably finally see that increase. They also have 15MHz of n25 and 15MHz of n25 and 15MHz n71. The fastest speed I recorded while there was 922 down and 120 up, presumably aggregating n41+n25 and potentially n71 as well but I wasn't able to confirm that. A couple of things I noticed about their network are that their is a ton of split-sector n25 deployed in San Juan, much like in the U.S. I even noticed some n41 sites that had 4 or more sectors. The weirdest being the site on top of SJU Airport where they have 6 n41 sectors each broadcasting 80MHz of n41. AT&T SIMs roam on LIberty's network but they still treat it as the home network. In my opinion they're the second best network in Puerto Rico. Liberty is still using the AT&T MCC-MNC code and is pretty much coasting on AT&T's network upgrades. They have 10MHz n5 virtually everywhere but I never saw my phone connect to any other 5G bands. Their saving grace was just how much spectrum they have to aggregate across midband and lowband. I'd see combos like 10MHz n5 + 20MHz B2 + 10MHz B66 + 10MHz Band 30 + 5MHz Band 2 and get upwards of 200Mbps. Coverage was slightly worse than T-Mobile in my experience, even indoors which is a surprise given T-Mobile usually struggles a bit indoors due to their macro density. Verizon is roaming on Claro in Puerto Rico just as they have been for years. No idea if there is 5G roaming because I was connected to LTE the entire time. Toggling 5G didn't do anything and both pings and speeds weren't great. Speeds were in the 20-40Mbps range consistently and pings over 200ms. For comparison T-Mobile's pings are in the teens and Liberty pings are in the 40's even when roaming using an AT&T SIM. Claro's network is ok in my experience with nothing really notable about it.  — — — — — Here are some pics of sites that I took:
    • WTB instructed to process all 2.5GHz licenses across the USA. They are only giving up some spectrum in certain markets of Hawaii.
    • Is this just for licenses in Hawaii?
    • Yeah, it basically directs the bureau to proceed with granting the applications in the normal course.  It's no longer being held by the AT&T objection. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...