utiz4321

I am hardly ever out of b41 coverage in the east valley. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So reading this I am a bit confused. Is Phoenix clear for deployment or is it part of the border region? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do to frequency reuse 2.5 does have more capacity than lower bands. So the advantage isn't as small as you play it out. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think it does. It has a network reporting function built in and has had one for a while Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Really? I never have a problem. Data is slow and sometimes doesn't work, but that isn't any different than 1x on sprint. Voice and text work fine. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For what they've said it sounds like NGN is just part of their normal 5 bil capex spend. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For new plans? Now I am so hyped up I am sure I am going to be disappointed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I feel like with all of this build up, what ever they come out with tomorrow will be disappointing. Lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This article is following the same intellectually dishonest line of thinking that conflates unlimited data with unlimited 4g, unthrottled which are two entirely different things. Content providers want unlimited unthrottled 4g service to be the norm because it maximized access to what they are selling. Since the tech media is itself a content provider their interest are aligned in this direction, which is why I believe you see so many articles from people who presumably graduated from some kind of college and should understanding they are conflating two separate things but continue to do it all the same. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of the new markets, their were only three sprint was last in. The others they tied for 2nd or third. In those markets where they did finish last the gap wasn't that large. So, these new reports should be read as encouraging. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The 70000 comes from ATT's plans. The last numbers I saw with regards to sprint's plans were 30000. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They should be. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why and how coverage is different is not relevant. The only relevant point is what "best" plan available through retail means. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Given that a relatively small number of sprint retail customers are responsible for the majority of the data used on their network your small number argument is a bit specious. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why would it be a 30 gig plan? How is that the "best" retail available plan? What does the word "best" mean in this context. That is what is going to be litigated. "Best" =/= the largest data plan. It would be interesting to hear sprint's rationale behind placing them on a 6 gig plan. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sprint just can't catch a break when it comes to dealing with counties, squatters and lawsuits. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sprint just can't catch a break when it comes to dealing with counties, squatters and lawsuits. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The TDD restriction is disappointing. As I understand the benefit of this technology is that since it utilizes interference it increase reuse so that the biggest advantages is to increase capacity on low frequency spectrums since they have lower reuse. Is there any low band frequencies structured to do TDD? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They are happy with the progress that is being made and that is about it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just don't get the point of such a device. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Get used to it. The carriers are shifting from changing the offers they had in phones to draw customers in to using the plans to draw customers in. You'll keep seeing plans change and shift until carriers find another method of getting customers in their stores. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would say that is the majority of there post paid prime customers. People like to travel and like to travel to rural areas. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sprint doesn't provide roaming for customers that live in super rural areas. They provide roaming for customers that spend 99 percent of their time in sprint service areas but still want to have service for the 1 percent of times they are outside of a sprint service area and that if they didn't offer that service would not be their customer. That 500 million figure would add about 1.4 (assuming about 30 million or so post paid subs) to the cash cost per user a month. A significant amount but not probably worth eliminating given what it would cost them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10 dollar add a line never applied to smartphones. You always had to buy a data plan making the min. Amount to add a smart phone 25. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, it is complete bs that people like that even pretend to inform the public. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk