utiz4321

Would that get Softbank around the covenants with the Japanese banks? Because if it wouldn't then Softbank cant invest that money into sprint. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

If buffet puts that kind of money into sprint he would be agreeing with you. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Would you buy it at 8.5? That is the question. I bought it at around 2 back in NV 1.0 days, it was definitely undervalued then. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

It can't be a loan. Sprint's balance sheet is already messed up. Market caps is what the market believes the company to be valued at. If you think it is under valued by 20 billion you should invest. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sprint only has a market cap of 30 billion. I think an imvestment of two thirds the value of the company would be a hell of a bet. Hard to see why anyone would do that. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Sprint has already indicated that they will raise prices as soon as they can. They have said current price levels are unsustainable. If VZW raise prices expect to see the industry follow. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

That was in Chandler mall. It is the first sign of a mini macro I have seen in the valley. Speeds were above 60 mbs. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Well, that is helpful too. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Thanks Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Quick question. What does the MM mean here? Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

We have had discussion on net neutrality before. You are pro and I don't think the government should decide how profits are divided up between content and infurstructor companies. Do people value being able to access their content quickly and reliably from anywhere they are located more that have more choices on content? I don't know and I don't the government does either. I would like to point out that in the history of the internet net neutrality has never had the force of law except a few years under the Obama administration. In all that time before that date nothing like the apocalyptic vision of the internet came into being and there is no reason to think it would, because the consumer values the openness of the internet. The closest you can come to a walled garden is the app store but even then every iphone has a web browser. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

The same will be true of time warner content soon, They will have to negotiate with ATT. I dont see problems with that. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Content providers have a plethora of delivery methods, many of which are under utilized because of the relatively good relationships between content and deviled companies. A good example of the is HBO now and how long it took HBO to take that step. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

That is my point exactly. Who cares if all the cable companies merged together. In the vast majority of markets it wouldnt make any difference in the number of providers people have to choose from. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

I don't get the anti-trust argument against cable companies merging. They dont compete directly. Cable companies are local monopolies who compete with sat. And telephone companies to deliver content. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

I don't get why the loss of 6000 jobs is the problem of the creditors. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Most of those post I have read here are people who haven't been contacted. In any case I have not and I applied about a month ago. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ummm... no. That makes no sense and if SoftBank bought T-Mobile they would have exactly zero credibility in the market place. I can't even think of an example that even comes close to what you proposing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Has anyone receive one or receive any communication from sprint after applying on the webpage? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think so. I think ATT is having success with the purchase of DTV and cable is looking to achieve some of the same kinds of benefits while sprint is looking for money to build out it's network. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is funny you still knew what it meant. English isn't my first language and I think that was a simple spelling mistake, not a grammatical error. But thanks. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

I personally love Trump's response. Cities shouldn't be allowed to hold up our infurstructor projects. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

We agree on that, I just think living in a time before streets were illuminated at night by street lights is moronic and wouldnt want to hear my neighbor complain about being mugged at night. And utilities and infurstructor can be built on right of ways. There even exist something called eminent domain were You are only entitled to compensation and your property can be siezed. Also, be a little more cynical about zoning laws. They arent as high and lofty of a thing as you make it out. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

If you have followed what I have been saying I never said my preferences should supersede anyone's. I have stated my opinion and ask that if there are areas and groups of other people that strangle wireless deployment with retarded permiting and zoning regulations that those people : stop complaining about how bad their service is, how few choices for wireless providers there are, how other countries are more technically advance and complaining about how the US sucks in wireless broadband access because THEY ARE THE CAUSE!. I am fine with people having other priorities and if the majority of people want to live in a country stuck in time fine, just don't be a hypocrite and complain about it. Also, regardless of what zoning laws are suppose to be, they are often tools of special interests. And again "ugly" to who? Not me. Your Aesthetics are off. Are street lights ugly? Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

You are missing the point. It isnt that it never passes the cost benefit analysis to put up a camouflage tower or small cell, it is that it pass a CBA less often and therefore marginal areas don't get improved service. I dont have a problem with the way towers look, I actually like them. I dont see why your aesthetic sensibility should have precedence over mine. Oh, and if you were a sponsor of this site you would know sprint is expanding the number of sites they have. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk