![](http://content.invisioncic.com/r161138/set_resources_1/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Tengen31
-
Posts
2,493 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Posts posted by Tengen31
-
-
Yes I know thatYes. That is not low/midband spectrum as I said.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Yeah VZW is buying B48 TDDDish has very clearly expressed that they want to do something with their spectrum. Buildout deadlines have passed and been extended. They likely will not be extended again.
If the merger falls through and Dish's options are to partner with an existing carrier or to build a network from scratch and try to compete on a national scale, I think they would choose the former. This market is one of economies of scale and enormous barriers to entry. If Dish were to try to build a network from scratch, they wouldn't see profit for years and years. And even after this time, ROI isn't guaranteed.
T-Mobile isn't as interested in smaller chunks of low/midband spectrum as they already have enough. What they need is large swaths of highband for NR. This is probably their biggest motivation for the merger. Dish can’t help them there.
AT&T has more spectrum than they can put on air, and isn't looking for more. They have B14 and B66 that hasn't been deployed across half, if not more of the nation.
Verizon has repeatedly stated that they are perfectly happy with their current low/midband spectrum holdings. If they wanted to bid on 600 MHz spectrum, they could and would have.
This leaves Sprint, who I think could benefit a lot from Dish's spectrum holdings.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
What's B23? Aws4 is B70Or they could get in bed with Dish. Dish's 600 holdings are 5x5 nationwide with larger holdings in major metros.
http://maps.spectrumgateway.com/dish-600-mhz.html
Working with Dish would also get them:- 6 MHz 700 E Block (722-728) (This can likely be traded/sold to AT&T)
- 15 MHz AWS-3 (1695-1710)
- 10 MHz PCS-H (1915-1920, 1995-2000) (I wonder if some DSS magic could be done here to allow for a PCS C+G+H NR carrier)
- 40 MHz AWS-4 (2000-2020, 2180-2200) (Sprint can petition for LTE band 23 to be standardized for NR in order to use this spectrum)
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Dang in my area dish has 10x10 which Sprint could use as we don't have any FDD higher than 2 5x5'sOr they could get in bed with Dish. Dish's 600 holdings are 5x5 nationwide with larger holdings in major metros.http://maps.spectrumgateway.com/dish-600-mhz.html
Working with Dish would also get them:
- 6 MHz 700 E Block (722-728) (this can likely be traded/sold to AT&T)
- 15 MHz AWS-3 (1695-1710)
- 10 MHz PCS-H (1915-1920, 1995-2000) (I wonder if some DSS magic could be done here to allow for a PCS C+G+H NR carrier)
- 40 MHz AWS-4 (2000-2020, 2180-2200)
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Sprint needs it Nationwide. TMO got 10x10 all the way up to 20x20 vzw has 10x10 B13 Nationwide and 10x10 B5 in threw out not the whole country. Att has 10x10 across B12,14 and 5. Sprint is only 5x5 and some areas 3x3Could buy it off of Dish only in areas they need it initially and start a slow 600MHz rollout.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Though so. TMobile has 15x15 B block.. att it's likely 20x20 and VZW IDKNope. Just the 15x15 C4+C5+G carrier right now.
Sprint doesn't own any PCS A block spectrum in San Diego. The A block is wholly owned by AT&T.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
The best thing to do would be make better decisions. It's too late for them to get 600 mhz which they need unless they can get it from Dish and ComcastI think if Sprint’s 5G deployment continues to go well, they’ll be able to buy themselves some time to figure out how to make a comeback.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
TMobile was banking on the merger for 5G. They don't have enough spectrum for 5G plus Sprints capex was also part of the plan. If they are on their own, they will have to find a way to buy more which isn't available unless the can some how get their hands on B48 which VZW is buying. So their only option would be to force people onto 5G devices and use B71 and 66 or 2 for it.Looks like Illinois jumping on the train to block the merger. I’m sure what comes with this is people saying “if the merger is blocked, Sprint will be out of business and their assets sold to other companies.” Everyone is just completely looking past T-Mobile stopping their 5G deployment all together. To me, that looks like a money issue if you ask me especially if it’s suppose to be BAU until the merger closes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Yep I forgot about that. Is there a 2nd carrier on top of that? Spectrum Omega shows that Sprint has the A,C and G block there. I know c and G are accurateSan Diego has 15x15 L1900.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Thats right I think Sprint has contiguous spectrum there. 20x20 which would allow for that 15x15The upload speeds weren’t terrible. They must’ve had upload CA enabled. I did see 31Mbps up on what must’ve been that newly widened 15x15 band 25. It was wonderful!
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
That area should have tons of B41 and I think 10x10+5x5 on B25. Sprint upload speeds would be better if they did 25+41+41+41 CA and not just 41+41+41I was pleasantly surprised with Sprint’s performance in my recent short trip to San Diego. Inside the airport is still terrible to ok but outside the airport and around Pacific Beach was very good. I was extremely disappointed with Verizons service in Pacific Beach. Severe congestion led to the inability to break 2Mbps down.
Here is a summary of my tests from this recent trip:
Sprint Average DL: 57.75Mbps
Verizon Average DL: 42.66Mbps
Sprint Average UL: 8.07Mbps
Verizon Average UL: 12.57Mbps
Verizon’s average speeds were bolstered by excellent performance at the airport. Sprint’s fastest download speed was 149Mbps while out and about in Pacific Beach. Verizon’s fastest download was 123Mbps inside the airport at gate 36. This isn’t exactly scientific as these were the averages of only 7 tests so take it as you will.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
-
It could work on Sprint as a VOLTE only device. It has 25,26 and 41Yeah, I don't think any of the older model will ever be compatible with Sprint in its current form (Sans merger)
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
It will happen just waiting on the lawsuits. I'm a liberal but, done support them on thisMerger close?... It's a big wild guess! Nothing has gone as it should nor does it continue to go as normal.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
1
-
-
The merger will change thatNo coverage from what I've heard.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
To much no coverage or att roaming?T-Mobile is congestion city combined with poor coverage.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Thats likely why they haven't widen B25 to 10x10 then. TMobile any good there?There are very few Sprint customers here. This is proven by the fact that I get consistently good speeds on 10x5 band 25.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Ok then at&t?
Verizon has terrible congestion issues if you aren’t on a small cell or mini macro. If you’re on a small cell or mini macro it’s great.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
Hopefully future phones will just support all carriers no matter where you buy it. Don't think the unlocked model will work on Sprint, only the Sprint modelIt does support BC10: https://fcc.report/FCC-ID/2ABZ2-GM1925
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
1
-
-
How about Verizon?No one else to switch to that's good.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
What does B25 have for Bandwidth there?Here in Western Washington the 3x3 B26 LTE carrier works better than Sprint's 5x5 in most markets. The key is having a robust network on other bands, good density and aggressive band switching when other bands are available. Samsung and Sprint have nailed it here. One of the best markets in the country.
Robert
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
He is right with that. But that doesn't mean 3x3 is better. 10x10 with always be best on low-band. Unlike Sprint VZW also aggregates B13 or 5 with other bandsI strongly agree with Robert. Good equipment (high gain antennas/high quality diplexers), good band management, good density and good network config can make a 3x3 carrier perform better than a 5x5 or even 10x10 carrier. I would take Sprint's 3x3 L800 in Seattle over Verizon's 10x10 L750 or T-Mobile's 5x5 L700 any day of the week.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
[emoji19][emoji57]I strongly agree with Robert. Good equipment (high gain antennas/high quality diplexers), good band management, good density and good network config can make a 3x3 carrier perform better than a 5x5 or even 10x10 carrier. I would take Sprint's 3x3 L800 in Seattle over Verizon's 10x10 L750 or T-Mobile's 5x5 L700 any day of the week.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
-
If Sprint had vzws pocket book I think their network would be way better and I think they would have taken on att in the aws 3 auction and TMO in the 600. 600 being more important.It should help in my Grandparents area where T-Mobile only has 30MHz for LTE and Sprint has 40MHz for LTE.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread
in General Topics
Posted
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk