Jump to content

Ascertion

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    3,394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Ascertion

  1. Coming from T-Mobile in December, I can honestly say my service with Sprint in rural areas is much better. At least in North Carolina, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Speeds arent always record breaking but I've hit areas in Maryland where I would get 100mbps easily, where with Tmobile it was still 2g. T-Mobile is full of crap with their coverage and I was highly disappointed in their B12 coverage.

    Some rural areas here in Jacksonville are complete dead spots on Tmo, even though the maps show verified coverage??

    • Like 2
  2. Fraydog has tried T-Mobile prepaid in his area, so he knows the ins and outs.

     

    As for Jacksonville, it was like a year ago that S4GRU members were saying how great Sprint had become there. Now, that is no longer true? Well, the same can hold for T-Mobile. Give it a year.

     

    AJ

    They actually were becoming great but all of the sudden (around the time they started adding subs), their speeds tanked in my area. No word on B41 upgrades, I figured it was time to switch until Sprint gets upgrades rolling.

     

    Sent from my Nexus 5X

    • Like 1
  3. I just couldn't switch off to either Sprint or T-Mobile where I live. Sprint because there is simply no coverage in my small backwater town, and T-Mobile due to the lack of low band in St. Louis. I know I don't chime in much anymore here, but I think that my own low perception of T-Mobile all along might have been influenced by lack of low band on their part here. Now granted, it isn't all their fault, some of it probably lies on USCC holding the 700 A license in St. Louis and Southern Illinois in what I would describe as a marginal matter, but I'd also say that maybe T-Mobile should just offer the right price and get it over with.

    Just wanted to point out, T-Mobile is absolutely fantastic here in Jacksonville, FL.  And they do not have lowband here either.  St Louis might be different but I'd definitely give T-Mobile a try and see how their coverage is.  You should be able to test their speeds on an unactivated sim.

    • Like 1
  4. Yeah no point in rushing to it, and honestly not reacting is a good thing sometimes.

     

    New Sprint has done an excellent job of reacting to changes in the industry, but sometimes they do not need to.

    This new Sprint has stopped the exodus of customers because they've reacted well to competitor's offerings.  Going back to Hesse era, where none of the uncarrier events were even acknowledged led Sprint down the path of doom.  Sprint would be very wise to respond to this T-Mobile and AT&T offering because their stance is "best value in wireless", whereas they need to compete on price and right now their unlimited data plans are more expensive than T-Mobile and AT&T's unl plans.

    • Like 2
  5. Not sure what's going on. Sprint was really good after NV1.0 was mostly completed in Jax, then about 3 months ago went to total shit. Clear B41 is totally overloaded and calls are totally unreliable. If you can catch some Sprint B41, it is fast, especially with CA.

     

    Do we still have a High-Level Sprint contact that we can contact on S4GRU? Anybody that you guys know? I've called and submitted countless tickets and never get a response and the issue continues to get worse.

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

    I never had issues with calls, but data all around my (St Johns area) is flaky.  Sub 1mbps on Sprint's LTE occurred way too often.  In the mean time, I've switched over to T-Mobile (who happens to have a very appealing unl family plan at the moment.)  If you live within the city, I'd recommend them.  In those same spots, T-Mobile tends to average 80-100x the speeds of Sprint.  Mainly around the Avenues Mall is a big area I frequent.  I wonder if Sprint's going to convert the Wimax site in the Walmart parking lot soon.

  6. An unlocked version with full domestic band support certainly does seem like a strong possibility.  Even though there will be just one "US" hardware variant, it has come to light that separate firmware still will create operator specific variants.  The Sprint variant, for example, will support the usual CCA/RRPP compliant bands 2/4/5/12/25/26/41, while other LTE bands for VZW and AT&T will be locked out.

     

    http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=17201

     

    AJ

    How do the RF numbers hold up on this device for Sprint?

  7. Probably 25% of B41 sites already have sufficient backhaul for 3xCA, and another 25% within the next 6 months. Hopefully they will fire it up on a site by site basis when ready, and not wait for all areas to be ready.

     

    Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

    Didn't Sprint order backhaul providers with adjustable backhaul?  Meaning enabling the necessary backhaul is as simple as ordering it from the backhaul vendor who can remotely adjust it?

    • Like 1
  8. At&t pings here are not bad but most certainly not the best. Every band 41 speed test I tried it on was in the Orlando market and not one of them are below 60. From the Villages to downtown Orlando. Must be a lot of DDC issues in central Florida.

    This is a Sprint one in Jax.

    31c37c78f11270a6e7472cceb00b2eb1.jpg

     

    Now sure what the deal is but when I switched to the Nexus 5x, my pings went down considerably from my HTC One M8.

     

    Sent from my Nexus 5X

×
×
  • Create New...