Jump to content

The People's Operator coming to the US as a Sprint MVNO

MacinJosh

By MacinJosh
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted

Phonenews.com this morning is reporting The People's Operator is coming to the US market in 2015. They have opted to use the Sprint Network and have already signed the agreement.

 

The operator has already signed an agreement with Sprint to launch services on its network in 2015, while the funding for the expansion will come from a flotation of the company on the FTSE AIM stock exchange that is planned for next month. The flotation of the company on the exchange is expected to raise at least £100 million (€127 million/$161 million) with the majority of the cash raised going towards the building of the US and international launch infrastructure.

 

http://www.phonenews.com/uk-mvno-the-peoples-operator-aiming-for-us-expansion-as-sprint-mvno-29075/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BenChase7 Member Level: 4G WiMax

BenChase7

Posted
Posted

I know Sprint wants the money but Sprint has way too many MVNOs lol (I think at least).

I  totally see your point but, NV (at full build out) can handle it with ease.  I say, let Sprint make some easy money at someone else's expense; perhaps, to fund a future spectrum purchase.  Plus, shareholders will love this, thus boosting Sprint's overall value.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I know Sprint wants the money but Sprint has way too many MVNOs lol (I think at least).

I totally see your point but, NV (at full build out) can handle it with ease. I say, let Sprint make some easy money at someone else's expense; perhaps, to fund a future spectrum purchase. Plus, shareholders will love this, thus boosting Sprint's overall value.

Sprint is not overburdened with MVNO's. They should keep the open nature of their MVNO program. I think it's a smart move. And investors love it when companies make money, so therefore, I think it's an awesome option for Sprint to have. My plans to start my own MVNO are still in the works, however, funding is my only problem.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BenChase7 Member Level: 4G WiMax

BenChase7

Posted
Posted

Sprint is not overburdened with MVNO's. They should keep the open nature of their MVNO program. I think it's a smart move. And investors love it when companies make money, so therefore, I think it's an awesome option for Sprint to have. My plans to start my own MVNO are still in the works, however, funding is my only problem.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

I remember you saying you plan on starting an MVNO via Sprint some time ago; I am still looking forward to that! Consider me a customer! :)  How is your plan progressing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joshnys8913 Member Level: eHRPD

joshnys8913

Posted
Posted

 

Sprint is not overburdened with MVNO's. They should keep the open nature of their MVNO program. I think it's a smart move. And investors love it when companies make money, so therefore, I think it's an awesome option for Sprint to have. My plans to start my own MVNO are still in the works, however, funding is my only problem.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

I see your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • wispiANt
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By wispiANt · Posted

      Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • chamb
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By chamb · Posted

      Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • chamb
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By chamb · Posted

      Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...