Jump to content

bandwidth caps the truth


Recommended Posts

http://gigaom.com/br...and-congestion/

 

http://m.techcrunch.com/2011/11/30/another-study-shows-data-caps-are-likely-ineffective-address-wrong-problem/

 

thought you guys mieght be interested.

basically there is no need for any isp to cap usage other then to make more money.

kingtiger

Edited by kingtiger
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish someone would tell AT&T that. It's the reason I am dumping them as my home ISP since 150GB is a laughable amount to cap monthly data usage at (as are $10 overages for every 50GB you go over 150GB).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish someone would tell AT&T that. It's the reason I am dumping them as my home ISP since 150GB is a laughable amount to cap monthly data usage at (as are $10 overages for every 50GB you go over 150GB).

 

I wish I had that option. its either Uverse with a 250gb soft cap and 10 dollar overages OR Comcast's hard cap, where I go over 250 twice and they cut my service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not to be a grammar Nazi, but it is "Do" not "Due" away with data caps...

Just thought I would point that out if you want this to be taken seriously and go somewhere.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

opps, thanks for pointing that out. i really should read over things more after i type theme.

i tend to be think to much about what i'm going to say rather then what i'm typing.

 

 

 

kingtiger

 

I hear you. I am used to double and triple checking what I write, because at work I catch so much heck for any mistake because I'm always doing everyone else's editing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was in Red Hook again and I swear there are more Link5G sites as there are Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T small cells combined in the entire neighborhood. It seemed like every other street I turned down had one installed. Hopefully carriers will start hopping on them soon. Seems like a lot of effort to go through for no one to use them.  — — — — — T-Mobile converted the Sprint site on top of NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park. I first mapped one sector of it back in November 2023 but I thought it was a small cell so I never pinned it but I ran into another sector today which caught me off guard. I'm unable to find a permit for the conversion so it's definitely a surprise. There's another T-Mobile site 1 block away that T-Mobile initially installed back in 2019 so I'm kinda surprised they're keeping both considering the Sprint conversion is on a much taller building and coule potentially provide much better coverage to the entire area. 
    • Still not seeing any ULS postings for pending T-Mobile UScellular merger in Dane county Wisconsin.
    • Came across another Crown Castle Solutions multi-tenant oDAS node in Brooklyn. Located at 40.7002286, -73.9612666. Nothing on T-Mobile or AT&T so I'm assuming these are all Verizon nodes that Crown Castle is anticipating another carrier will hop on down the line.
    • Same with factory unlocked
    • June security update is out (S22U TMO)
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...