Jump to content

Sprint Nextel forced IDEN migration versus Early Term Fees


jennajj8

Recommended Posts

Hello Everybody:

 

I have a situation with 30 devices on the Nextel IDEN network that as we all know has to migrate to the Sprint network by June . We have a lot of data usage but we also have a lot of Push To Talk usage. I am currently testing some phones on the Sprint Direct Connect PTT. Also though there is a strong possibility that we will need to move off of Sprint all together.

 

We are looking at over 3K in Early Term Fees. I have heard that Sprint will forgo the fees if we are on towers that are impacted and there are documented trouble tickets on the issue. 26 of our 30 devices are still on the IDEN according to Sprint. At the same time we are told that we are not "migration eligible" I have also heard that legally Sprint cannot hold us to the contracts because Sprint is no longer able to offer the same product anymore on the contract.

 

Does anyone have any feedback or advice for me on this?

 

Thanks

Jennajj8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you move from iden to Sprint CDMA you get upgrade pricing regardless on when you purchased the phones.

 

To leave Sprint while still under contract you almost need to prove that they are not holding up their end of the contract. As you said, filing all sorts of network tickets is one way, or unrepairable device issues...

 

I operate 300 DuraXTs. What phones are you testing and what do you think of Sprint DC so far?

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More details would be helpful - as tongboy mentioned you should easily be able to get 99 cent devices.

 

I have the same question for both of you - after all of the recent updates, how are you liking Sprint Direct Connect? How does it compare to iDEN and other PTT solutions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More details would be helpful - as tongboy mentioned you should easily be able to get 99 cent devices.

 

I have the same question for both of you - after all of the recent updates' date=' how are you liking Sprint Direct Connect? How does it compare to iDEN and other PTT solutions?[/quote']

 

And to add another question...how is it working while roaming on other networks?

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I will tell you my story...

 

Our migration was forced since they shut down the iden tower serving our work area. They gave me a three week notice and I saw no choice but to proceed.

 

The migration itself was a disaster. Sprint was very supportive and helped as much as our account rep could , however apparently Sprint activation servers and DC servers were so overwhelmed (probably because many customers were doing the same thing) it made it really tough on us. The first day we actually had to fall back on our old two way radios.

 

As time went on they did get a little better, however anyone that used the duraxt for DC wanted to throw it against the wall. DC on it was a test in patience. Many times DC calls would error out, and we make a lot of group connect calls and that really was a struggle. Two people would be standing right next to each other, with a really strong signal, and only one of them would get the groupconnect call. The tower we hit has a fast download speed (900k) however the upload for some reason is pathetic (15k or so). I knew that was not right, and was probably why the DC was horrible... It started happening when the tower was network visioned. I tried to create multiple network tickets but they would get closed immediately because we were in an active network vision area.

 

Then a firmware upgrade came out for the duraxt and I immediately applied it to our 300 or so phones. DC now works like a dream and people are finally happy. Group DC actually works much better than nextel group connect worked. DC is actually comperable to nextel, although in my experience it is maybe a second slower with the initial connection then iden was.

 

I honestly see no difference in speed or quality in DC when roaming on 3g or on sprints network. 1x makes response a bit slower then evdo but it is just as clear.

 

Overall I am impressed with it now, but I really wonder why such a horrible firmware release made it out on the devices. If the phone roamed at all it would not switch back to sprints network, ever (really sprint?!) They almost lost us as a customer.

 

It is nothing like the original qchat that sprint introduced a few years ago. Much, much better.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our company is in a similar situation. We have about 200 Sprint Nextel phones that we are currently moving over to Verizon

 

How did you guys decide to move over to Verizon?

 

What were the biggest reasons? From what I've heard, Verizon PTT choices are fairly limited but a lot of people are switching to smartphones and tablets.

 

Just curious why people would leave SDC to Verizon. It seems like a lot of the network issues have been fixed (e911com over at howardforums posts good updates on firmware releases/improvements).

 

It seems like, with roaming, SDC is a far superior PTT solution - so I am probably missing other factors of why people are switching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did you guys decide to move over to Verizon?

 

What were the biggest reasons? From what I've heard, Verizon PTT choices are fairly limited but a lot of people are switching to smartphones and tablets.

 

Just curious why people would leave SDC to Verizon. It seems like a lot of the network issues have been fixed (e911com over at howardforums posts good updates on firmware releases/improvements).

 

It seems like, with roaming, SDC is a far superior PTT solution - so I am probably missing other factors of why people are switching.

 

It was actually the price savings we would have over Sprint. We were an independent company up until 8 months ago or so. Then we got swallowed up by Sonepar, who is massive, and has pretty hefty discounts with Verizon.

 

We aren't using PTT at all anymore. Just going the bluetooth route for our drivers, and smartphones for everyone here in the office.

 

But I think pricing was the biggest motivator. Even with paying some ETFs we'd end up saving long term with Verizon. Not sure on the details, but thats just what I was told, as the decision came from our corp office.

 

Our drivers had/have the Duraxt, and when they first got them there were a lot of complaints. But since a couple of updates they've been pretty pleased with the results overall.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was actually the price savings we would have over Sprint. We were an independent company up until 8 months ago or so. Then we got swallowed up by Sonepar, who is massive, and has pretty hefty discounts with Verizon.

 

We aren't using PTT at all anymore. Just going the bluetooth route for our drivers, and smartphones for everyone here in the office.

 

But I think pricing was the biggest motivator. Even with paying some ETFs we'd end up saving long term with Verizon. Not sure on the details, but thats just what I was told, as the decision came from our corp office.

 

Our drivers had/have the Duraxt, and when they first got them there were a lot of complaints. But since a couple of updates they've been pretty pleased with the results overall.

 

Thx for the feedback - it seems like a big draw for a lot of companies has been bundles with iphones/ipads and other non-PTT devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I will tell you my story...

 

Our migration was forced since they shut down the iden tower serving our work area. They gave me a three week notice and I saw no choice but to proceed.

 

The migration itself was a disaster. Sprint was very supportive and helped as much as our account rep could , however apparently Sprint activation servers and DC servers were so overwhelmed (probably because many customers were doing the same thing) it made it really tough on us. The first day we actually had to fall back on our old two way radios.

 

As time went on they did get a little better, however anyone that used the duraxt for DC wanted to throw it against the wall. DC on it was a test in patience. Many times DC calls would error out, and we make a lot of group connect calls and that really was a struggle. Two people would be standing right next to each other, with a really strong signal, and only one of them would get the groupconnect call. The tower we hit has a fast download speed (900k) however the upload for some reason is pathetic (15k or so). I knew that was not right, and was probably why the DC was horrible... It started happening when the tower was network visioned. I tried to create multiple network tickets but they would get closed immediately because we were in an active network vision area.

 

Then a firmware upgrade came out for the duraxt and I immediately applied it to our 300 or so phones. DC now works like a dream and people are finally happy. Group DC actually works much better than nextel group connect worked. DC is actually comperable to nextel, although in my experience it is maybe a second slower with the initial connection then iden was.

 

I honestly see no difference in speed or quality in DC when roaming on 3g or on sprints network. 1x makes response a bit slower then evdo but it is just as clear.

 

Overall I am impressed with it now, but I really wonder why such a horrible firmware release made it out on the devices. If the phone roamed at all it would not switch back to sprints network, ever (really sprint?!) They almost lost us as a customer.

 

It is nothing like the original qchat that sprint introduced a few years ago. Much, much better.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

Your story is exactly my biggest concern. I do not like the feeling that we may be up for service issues during the transition (giunypig) Our phones testing DC are to new yet to give an opinion. One thing you mentioned is a red flag in that opening trouble tickets may very well just get closed immediately as we are in an "active network vision area" I am very curious of the firmware update. What was the length of time your service was impacted? what is the firmware upgrade?, and how long ago did this happen? On roaming - we do not have a lot of roaming activity. I hope to have feedback to offer on the DC service soon.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your story is exactly my biggest concern. I do not like the feeling that we may be up for service issues during the transition (giunypig) Our phones testing DC are to new yet to give an opinion. One thing you mentioned is a red flag in that opening trouble tickets may very well just get closed immediately as we are in an "active network vision area" I am very curious of the firmware update. What was the length of time your service was impacted? what is the firmware upgrade?, and how long ago did this happen? On roaming - we do not have a lot of roaming activity. I hope to have feedback to offer on the DC service soon.

 

The day we moved over to sprint DC was the only day we had service so bad we had to fall back on our radios. DC didn't work well after that until last week when we ran a phone update. Since then it has worked well.

 

On your duraxt go into tools - update phone - update firmware and it pulls down the new software over the air.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...