Jump to content

Some experiments with SDR.

Recommended Posts

hhm0    3

After reading the awesome post @

, I decided to do some stuff with my LG-D820, RTL-SDR(w/E4000,and a 1-paper-clip antenna).


Using the calculations mentioned in that post, I tuned to the 18xx frequency, and to the 19xx, based on the info from 1x engineering. I saw a wider signal than I was expecting, but soon found that the 1900 band uses 5MHz allocations, and not 1.25 as 800 does.


I have been getting eHRPD w/EVDO, and occasionaly 1x, so did not need to check LTE.


I made a call, checked for new email, and streamed video, as testing.


However, according to that post, 18xx is uplink (phone to tower) and 1900 is downlink (tower to phone). This was what the looking around showed me. However, I only saw traffic on the uplink (a lot, proportional to the actions being performed (email checking makes a bit of activity, and watching streaming video makes much more, for longer). However, on the downlink frequency, no discernable activity showed. Is this because my paper clip antenna will not pick up the towers anyway, or is this my device doing secret stuff? :-D Or is an alternate downlink frequency being used, or is my device rebroadcasting traffic (for the NSA :-D), or maybe for traffic alleviation via mesh network



Attached is the screen of SDR app!


Enjoy! :-)


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
dbsynergy    315

It's probably that the paperclip can't hear the tower very well. Those cheap SDR's don't have very good receive sensitivity. Since your phone is probably very close to the SDR, it will show a very strong signal, and depending on how your signal is on your phone, it could be broadcasting something like 5 watts of power. 


I've been having some fun with my RTL-SDR and I'm considering getting a more expensive Ettus Research SDR to experiment with. I actually hooked my SDR up to my big ham radio antenna in my back yard and I can hear AM broadcasts from the other side of the world. Those things are a lot of fun.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
WiWavelength    31,431

If the handset is sitting right next to the paperclip antenna, the uplink RSSI is probably around 0 dBm, while the downlink RSSI is probably in the neighborhood of -90 dBm.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
hhm0    3

Thanks for the info, everyone!


Makes sense. (and as far as I know the RTL-SDR does not use beamforming techniques for SDMA receiving out-of-the-box :-D)


But anyway, it is pretty awesome seeing my device radio-waving!


I don't have an amatuer radio antenna, since I don't have an amateur radio license (at least not yet)!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
kg4icg    1,180

Most Hams build there antennas for the higher bands. You do not need a license to listen and you can find the info on the net. In the order of a high gain directional antenna will work best.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
hhm0    3

Antenna input is attached to coaxial cable which goes to somewhere outside (hopefully roof antenna, hard to work outside in the winter coldness to verify this!).


1x800 voice call, uplink (signal changes based on voice, full volume -> full signal):



1x800 voice call, downlink (in order to see any change in signal, had to hold the device within a few inches of the SDR device. Signal may be some kind of subtraction/difference or something.):




EV-DO data 1900 downlink:


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



    **or an Android device of equal or lesser value**


  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • you'll need to flash the Sprint firmware. 
    • There are really two providers in Canada: ROGERS and TELUS/Bell. TELUS and Bell operate the same network. 
    • How is Canada's three wireless companies working out...
    • No. You are not based in reality if you think the wireless market is going to stagnate if Sprint and T-Mobile merge. 5g is coming and will be pushed by everyone in the market place.    The question is weather you want it to follow the same pattern LTE did or not. Would you like the big two to deploy a really solid 5g network and the other two to deploy an uneven networks or 3 solid th networks?    You anti-merger people dont understand the role capital intensive industries play in shaping such markets.  If a market is capital intensive it is more efficient with fewer players. Imgaine if the market still looked like it did in 2003, we would have plenty of players and regional plans with not even 3g deployed.   Sprint has 30 billion. They are able to increase CAPEX this year because they don't have much maturing this year.  This is not the case the next two years which means they are likely to starve their network again over that time. Mean while the big two aren't going to stand still. Sprint isn't growing top line income fast enough to make themselves viable on their own.      
    • This merger would stagnate the wireless market it would stink almost immediately.  You are pro-merger but already wondering if they would have capital to build and expand the network.  Sprint now has positive revenue to increase CAPEX for additional B41, MIMO, and 5G why hault the improvements that Sprint has been making?   You guys screaming pro merger really need to sit back and really think, are you willing to see less competition and increasing wireless bills?  Not to mention that unlimited will be a thing of the past, after all it was Sprint and T-Mobile that made the big two offer unlimited.  If this merger goes through I don't want to hear complaining I am taking names...
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.