Jump to content

So, any guess on St Louis, and how good will it be?


Recommended Posts

I know everyone wants to know about their town. But, I'm pretty much about to jump ship from Sprint after 10 years. First, Motorola screwed me by announcing last year they wouldn't be upgrading my less than a year old Photon to ICS or JB. So, then I was eligible for an upgrade in September, but since Sprint hasn't delivered or even announced LTE in St Louis, I would lose my existing 4g (wimax) if I bought a new phone. We were pretty early on wimax, but now little towns are getting LTE with no mention of St Louis yet. And, the 3g has gone downhill, I used to get around 1.3mb down on 3g, and now it's more like 700k. So going back to 3g, even temporarily, is not an acceptable.

 

I've reviewed AT&T's coverage maps for LTE and it seems to be pretty strong. The rep at Best Buy right by my house installed Speedtest on his AT&T Note II for me and ran a speed test and got around 24mb down.

 

So, I guess my questions are when will we see LTE in St Louis? And, even if it were tomorrow, would it be another year before the coverage was even complete/decent? Because it sure looks like AT&T is there now. I would be willing to give Sprint a few more months, but not if it will be spotty when it is delivered. And, if we haven't even been mentioned, it leads me to believe we could be looking at mid to late this year at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone wants to know about their town. But, I'm pretty much about to jump ship from Sprint after 10 years. First, Motorola screwed me by announcing last year they wouldn't be upgrading my less than a year old Photon to ICS or JB. So, then I was eligible for an upgrade in September, but since Sprint hasn't delivered or even announced LTE in St Louis, I would lose my existing 4g (wimax) if I bought a new phone. We were pretty early on wimax, but now little towns are getting LTE with no mention of St Louis yet. And, the 3g has gone downhill, I used to get around 1.3mb down on 3g, and now it's more like 700k. So going back to 3g, even temporarily, is not an acceptable.

 

I've reviewed AT&T's coverage maps for LTE and it seems to be pretty strong. The rep at Best Buy right by my house installed Speedtest on his AT&T Note II for me and ran a speed test and got around 24mb down.

 

So, I guess my questions are when will we see LTE in St Louis? And, even if it were tomorrow, would it be another year before the coverage was even complete/decent? Because it sure looks like AT&T is there now. I would be willing to give Sprint a few more months, but not if it will be spotty when it is delivered. And, if we haven't even been mentioned, it leads me to believe we could be looking at mid to late this year at best.

 

Why not install ICS on the photon yourself and keep your WiMax. I bet they have working WiMax on CM10 now.

 

Edit: look here

 

Screenshot_2012-10-28-21-47-55.png?dl=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone wants to know about their town. But, I'm pretty much about to jump ship from Sprint after 10 years. . . .

 

So, I guess my questions are when will we see LTE in St Louis? And, even if it were tomorrow, would it be another year before the coverage was even complete/decent? Because it sure looks like AT&T is there now. I would be willing to give Sprint a few more months, but not if it will be spotty when it is delivered. And, if we haven't even been mentioned, it leads me to believe we could be looking at mid to late this year at best.

 

If you were a sponsor, you would see that there are current Network Vision/LTE installations going on in Hannibal, in and near Columbia, and also multiple sites actually in St. Louis.

 

Based on my experience in Chicagoland, once the installations have begun (as they have for you), the progress has been rapid and comprehensive. Chicagoland was totally dark in late August, and as of today more than half of all Sprint sites in the region have LTE. I took the train northwest from downtown Chicago today, and got virtually non-stop usable LTE for over 40 miles. Pretty good progress in just over 4 months.

 

So, don't be too hasty in switching. If you are, you may miss a huge improvement in your cellular experience.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never really been interested in rooting, but even so, people say the Photon bootloader is locked and it can't be done?

 

From what I know, (outdated for sure), you can as long as your bootloader is unlockable, (complicated I know but probably worth the risk). Photons go for like $50 now so if it fails you can just buy a second hand Galaxy S II and root it easily.

 

EDIT: does your photon run 2.3.5 from motorola (show me your about phone screen)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lynyrd, yes 2.3.5, screen cap attached.....

post-9923-0-72332600-1358562764_thumb.png

 

Tommy, I'll look into paying up, new to the site, didn't know how it all worked.

 

Ricky, sorry, same.... new here :(

Edited by RJSinMO
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, don't be too hasty in switching. If you are, you may miss a huge improvement in your cellular experience.

 

and everyone keeps talking about this "bright future", but honestly, will it be any better than AT&T or Verizon at that point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lynyrd, yes 2.3.5, screen cap attached.....

mopho.png

 

Tommy, I'll look into paying up, new to the site, didn't know how it all worked.

 

Ricky, sorry, same.... new here :(

 

It's all good, look around it will be well worth the bucks! Let me know if you need any other help. Sorry it i was harsh :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lynyrd, yes 2.3.5, screen cap attached.....

mopho.png

 

Tommy, I'll look into paying up, new to the site, didn't know how it all worked.

 

Ricky, sorry, same.... new here :(

 

Unfortunately with the 2.3.5 update you cannot unlock your bootloader. You can however root your device and debloat it to make it run faster.

 

If you decide to wait but really want a new device with fast data you could get a second hand AT&T or T-Mobile device and use it on straight talk until Sprint upgrades their network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and everyone keeps talking about this "bright future", but honestly, will it be any better than AT&T or Verizon at that point?

 

You really do not want to go that route. AT&T and VZ have become horrible companies that are actively working and lobbying against the public interest. Do not encourage them by giving them more market share.

 

This article published today is a good place to start reading:

 

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Rick-Boucher-From-Fair-Use-Champ-to-ATT-Sockpuppet-122806

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really do not want to go that route. AT&T and VZ have become horrible companies that are actively working and lobbying against the public interest. Do not encourage them by giving them more market share.

 

This article published today is a good place to start reading:

 

http://www.dslreport...ckpuppet-122806

 

AJ

 

And Sprint is somehow a better company because they SOLD off their wireline businesses? I'm not trying to be anti-Sprint in this thread, as I've said I've been a very positive customer for 10 years. I was just asking if it was worth waiting for Sprint, if after waiting for them to get LTE in place, they will just then be equal to AT&T & Vzw, that I could have now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Sprint is somehow a better company because they SOLD off their wireline businesses? I'm not trying to be anti-Sprint in this thread, as I've said I've been a very positive customer for 10 years. I was just asking if it was worth waiting for Sprint, if after waiting for them to get LTE in place, they will just then be equal to AT&T & Vzw, that I could have now.

I have got to enjoy LTE for around 6 months, and yes it will be worth it to have unlimited LTE instead of limited!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

And Sprint is somehow a better company because they SOLD off their wireline businesses? I'm not trying to be anti-Sprint in this thread, as I've said I've been a very positive customer for 10 years. I was just asking if it was worth waiting for Sprint, if after waiting for them to get LTE in place, they will just then be equal to AT&T & Vzw, that I could have now.

 

Generally, if you need to state you're not anti-Sprint... You may be coming off just that way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally, if you need to state you're not anti-Sprint... You may be coming off just that way.

 

haha, well, I was just responding to his comment that AT&T and Vzw are "horrible" companies with a link that says it was because they are wanting to abandon their wired products.

 

But, more back to my original post(s), yes, I'm frustrated with Sprint for the situation that I'm in personally (with my specific phone) and that St Louis (and other wimax cities with no announced LTE) is in with real dis-incentive to buy a new phone. I would think it would be frustrating for Sprint retailers too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

haha, well, I was just responding to his comment that AT&T and Vzw are "horrible" companies with a link that says it was because they are wanting to abandon their wired products.

 

But, more back to my original post(s), yes, I'm frustrated with Sprint for the situation that I'm in personally (with my specific phone) and that St Louis (and other wimax cities with no announced LTE) is in with real dis-incentive to buy a new phone. I would think it would be frustrating for Sprint retailers too.

 

Of course it can be frustrating. All we can offer you here is the information that Sprint is putting all of its resources into modernizing its network. No one will try to change your mind or beg you to stay but good things are coming and for many of us, it already has.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...