Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Toledo Market (Toledo, Bowling Green, Findlay, Lima, Port Clition)


keelerman8042

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/toledo-oh/2015/2H

Darn still verizon, but an improvement for sure next time around should be on top or even closer

 

Also got this on central and mccord this weekend 611c5e2496ac2149981afd09d98b5075.jpg

 

Sent from my 0PJA2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just a quick update for the lima area (sorry for anyone looking for good news in lima)

 

Still just a 5x5 deployment and starting to get overloaded even at night with UNOH (the college)  i have not spotted any B41 equipment anywhere despite Verizon launching their XLTE here. 1x800 is pretty much live everywhere but 1x on 1900MHz was fine already.

 

There are still a few sites that were upgraded mid 2014 with all new equipment but are still 3G only.

 

Well i guess thats all for the lima area.....dang.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick update for the lima area (sorry for anyone looking for good news in lima)

 

Still just a 5x5 deployment and starting to get overloaded even at night with UNOH (the college)  i have not spotted any B41 equipment anywhere despite Verizon launching their XLTE here. 1x800 is pretty much live everywhere but 1x on 1900MHz was fine already.

 

There are still a few sites that were upgraded mid 2014 with all new equipment but are still 3G only.

 

Well i guess thats all for the lima area.....dang.....

Have not really seen much change around Toledo. Same couple towers still need work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Yep, 1x800 has been firing up like crazy in the Cleveland Market too.  It first was found via SCP logs in testing mode on February 18th in Downtown Cleveland.  It only formally went live in my area (I live 30 miles east of the city) on April 11th.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, 1x800 has been firing up like crazy in the Cleveland Market too. It first was found via SCP logs in testing mode on February 18th in testing mode in Downtown Cleveland. It only formally went live in my area (I live 30 miles east of the city) on April 11th.

I will say this too...it does kick some arse in our market there's places were I'd barley get a signal or I'd roam on and now it's atleast 90 or less for dbm range it goes a little lower once and while but it's plenty usable. Can't wait till fire up LTE on it

 

Sent from my 0PJA2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

X800 has been cutting out 4 days. Does anybody else until you don't notice these things or no? This is the Toledo Market I apologize for not stating that

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

X800 has been cutting out 4 days. Does anybody else until you don't notice these things or no? This is the Toledo Market I apologize for not stating that

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

1x800 still needs a lot of work in newly launched areas in the Cleveland Market, so my bet is that this also applies for Toledo. 1x1900 still outperforms (sometimes substantially) 1x800 in the primary IBEZ where it has only been on for a few months, and only officially launched about a month ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would rather have a better B25 and 41 signal everywhere than 1x800

 

It could be looked at this way: 1x800 is a pecursor to Band 26 which will help everyone. Hopefully the Canadian side rebranding will progress fairly quickly in order to make it happen. I'm not sure about areas outside of Toledo to the south and west, but metro Toledo and points East are full of B25 10x10. I think that is more beneficial for rural areas than B41.

 

I've been analyzing your market too and found that Sprint has added at minimum about a dozen sites (likely more that aren't iDEN conversions). Cleveland has gained about the same in iDEN conversions, but the big difference is that the Toledo market is about half the size of what is here, so the percentage of new native service by the addition of new sites is greater for you fine folks :tu:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be looked at this way: 1x800 is a pecursor to Band 26 which will help everyone. Hopefully the Canadian side rebranding will progress fairly quickly in order to make it happen. I'm not sure about areas outside of Toledo to the south and west, but metro Toledo and points East are full of B25 10x10. I think that is more beneficial for rural areas than B41.

 

I've been analyzing your market too and found that Sprint has added at minimum about a dozen sites (likely more that aren't iDEN conversions). Cleveland has gained about the same in iDEN conversions, but the big difference is that the Toledo market is about half the size of what is here, so the percentage of new native service by the addition of new sites is greater for you fine folks :tu:

 

tower conversions are good news as sprint greatly needs better coverage everywhere outside cities, with 3G sprints coverage is pretty darn good but because LTE is more fragile you end up with lots of lte spots with 3g in between rather than uniform lte coverage.

 

if they spent more money on adding new full tower build outs and fixing the coverage id bet that people would flock to sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint drop ball when completing backhaul upgrades i see it in every market i visit.

Thats not sprints fault its the providers fault, however sprint could push a bit harder when dealing with these ISPs

 

(oh sorry we didnt get that fiber to your tower can you give us 3 more months?)

 

The reason T-Mo was able to get their LTE deployed so easily is because when they started deploying HSPA and + it required more bandwith so they were already set to go for their LTE conversions, sprint was not due to 3G not requiring such a back haul. and now they are forced to wait.

Edited by stuckinohio1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats not sprints fault its the providers fault, however sprint could push a bit harder when dealing with these ISPs

 

(oh sorry we didnt get that fiber to your tower can you give us 3 more months?)

 

The reason T-Mo was able to get their LTE deployed so easily is because when they started deploying HSPA and + it required more bandwith so they were already set to go for their LTE conversions, sprint was not due to 3G not requiring such a back haul. and now they are forced to wait.

Just wanted to add to this. It is not just a sprint problem either. Many places in the United States simply do not have fiber infrastructure. I also believe many ISPs are just waiting for DOCSIS 3.1 in the next year so they can just keep their current copper lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tower conversions are good news as sprint greatly needs better coverage everywhere outside cities, with 3G sprints coverage is pretty darn good but because LTE is more fragile you end up with lots of lte spots with 3g in between rather than uniform lte coverage.

 

if they spent more money on adding new full tower build outs and fixing the coverage id bet that people would flock to sprint.

Actually, it wouldn't take very many new sites to fill in remaining coverage gaps with native Sprint service in your market (CDMA services). Your iDEN conversions mostly filled in a lot of substantial coverage holes that were west of Bowling Green to the Defiance area. The same is true for us in Cleveland with Ashtabula County going from freeway only coverage to almost continuous coverage just by doing iDEN conversions. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, it wouldn't take very many new sites to fill in remaining coverage gaps with native Sprint service in your market (CDMA services). Your iDEN conversions mostly filled in a lot of substantial coverage holes that were west of Bowling Green to the Defiance area. The same is true for us in Cleveland with Ashtabula County going from freeway only coverage to almost continuous coverage just by doing iDEN conversions. :tu:

To add to that LTE 800 not yet active will also further expand coverage

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i was looking through some of my logs and found 3rd carrier for band 41. These would be in southern Michigan over the border. Nothing i see in ohio yet. Have to see if CA is enable yet or not next time im around. Also note this area is not a high population area mostly rual.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

c220be4fe83ecc9e884b086a4f9b1c0c.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

There's a new tower being built on the corner where Lint turns into Matzinger.  Does anyone know if Sprint is trying to fix the dead zone that is Sylvania Ave?  Or just another verizon tower :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a new tower being built on the corner where Lint turns into Matzinger.  Does anyone know if Sprint is trying to fix the dead zone that is Sylvania Ave?  Or just another verizon tower :(

 

Can you check your local permits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

small update, Lima ohio now has 10x10 B25 LTE running, still no B26 or B41 up as far as i can see. 

how do i know? the 40 down and 20 up i got at iHop

If you see 26640/8640 for the earfcn in the lte engineering screen, chances are good that 10x10 has made a splash. The 10x10 B25 carrier has expanded greatly here over the last few weeks, so these wheelin' and dealin' spectrum swaps are now being realized at the consumer end.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...