Jump to content

Brad The Beast

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Brad The Beast

  1. 1 minute ago, Tengen31 said:

    They could try a name change. 

    Softbank US or something else?

    8 minutes ago, newyork4me said:

    Oh, and Sprint management also said that if the merger does not go through, they will refocus their network efforts on major metro areas

    3 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

    Still might not do any good if coverage isn't there. For sure if they go to the extreme of decreaseing coverage.

    Maybe they need to become the high-speed urban carrier?

  2. 45 minutes ago, utiz4321 said:

    It can't be that one because the government didn't approve that one and that's any deal AT&T made with them would have been voided. The Government Sued to stop it and Time warren content prices have not risen (they did not buy time warrener cable) to distributors. So, it cant be that one. 

    Incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/26/business/media/att-time-warner-appeal.html

  3. 9 minutes ago, lilotimz said:

    As I've stated elsewhere, Sprint as an independent entity has no real way foward.

     

    Sprint will be relegated to the history books but it's network may survive to tell the tale depending on who purchases it be it T-mobile ripping it out root and stem or a cable carrier wanting to vertically integrate and get off Verizon's MVNO deal.

     

    Softbank will not just let Sprint flounder and die. They will sell one way or another.

    It sucks because Sprint's plans are the bomb. I have no doubt that the combined Sprint/T-Mobile network would be amazing but I don't want to lose my awesome plan. 

  4. Just now, utiz4321 said:

    Sprint can't build a 5g network and an overloaded tmobile 5g network isn't any good to anyone. Sprint will probably die and definately will die as a national carrier if the merger doesn't go through. We are going to 3 national carriers. Take your pick on how. 

    Still shows that the "We can't make a nationwide 5G network" is a lie. They've been saying Sprint is going to die since the Nextel merger so I don't know if I believe that.

  5. 4 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

    I mean the scenarios are interesting to speak about, but can sprint really justify making any bigger investment into the network. It’s more serious now than it was back than the numbers are looking bad. Sprint is walking a thin line and investors and board members are going to seek a return on this investment and sprint just won’t be able to do it with negative cash flow at 539 million can’t justify spending any money on the network really. Customers aren’t coming even after the improvements.. migrations from prepaid isn’t helping much

    I'm quite curious as to what's going to happen with this initial 5G rollout since it shouldn't be complete trash like Verizon and AT&Ts. Maybe it could be the turnaround Sprint needs? I'm sure there are many money making opportunities with 5G and they're deploying it where the money is. 

  6. Just now, utiz4321 said:

    Oh, really. Go on and give an example. I'll wait. 

    "We can't make a nationwide 5G network". T-Mobile can. It won't be the fastest but it'll be nationwide. Sprint could with their 2.5GHz spectrum but this initial rollout would need to be spectacular. "Sprint will die if the merger fails". They've been saying that since the Nextel merger and they're still here. 

  7. 25 minutes ago, utiz4321 said:

    It is the merger or sprint becomes a regional player. We will have three national carriers, better to have three strong players than the duopoly and T-Mobile.   The regulators are insane if they don't let the deal happen. 

    The only thing I worry about is that I'm going to lose my awesome plan and prices are definitely going to go up. 

×
×
  • Create New...