utiz4321
-
Posts
1,688 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Everything posted by utiz4321
-
You can't worry about capex too much. The product these companies sell is directly correlated to capex spending. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
I havent noticed any small cell deployment in Phoenix. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Damn i was hoping b26 was on its way. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
That is not true. 800 voice has been live in phoenix for over a year. No sign of band 26 out side of this one though. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
How do you know it is sprint's? Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Yeah. But i think the fact they cant get any where argues that the market is better served by 3 players instead of four. It is an expensive industry with high fixed cost and it doesnt help that any podunk town or city can hold up deployment for some almost any retarded reason they want. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Maybe. But a new administration might let them merge. It is also my understanding their older bonds are basically unsecured, so sprint might be able to come through a bankruptcy intact. I dont think sprint can survive by starving their network again. Remember, this was the reason NV was necessary in the first place. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
To let the core product you sell deteriorate either relative to the competition or in absolute terms is never a good decision. But i think they have to do it because, given the regulatory cost America can not support 4 national carriers. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Why? We would have a very strong third player with a killer network. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
They should have been allowed to merge with tmobile. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
These are important issues but remember the product they are sell and what they are competing on is the network. If price is the only reason so one would choose Sprint, Sprint is doomed. They need to make the investment in the network to make the fastest network with the greatest capacity claim and i dont think they can pull it off by slashing CAPEX for positive cash flow. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Because 3 billion is the estimate they gave. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
He isn't wrong. 3 billion in capex is too low. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
As i am sitting in one of my favorite in the middle of the east valley to eat, right next to a tower that hasn't even seen NV 1.0 upgrades yet, i have a hard time believing Sprint is still planning on being the number one or two network in 80 percent of markets . Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
That is my point. If you are looking at sprint as a long term asset you need the network investment. If you are looking to sell, you need to improve the balance sheet. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Cable or dish.... In any case lake of info spawns speculation. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
And politicians have stated numerous time (fill in the blank). Besides they didnt sell last time because there were no buyers. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
The only way sprint can take advantage of it would be to be far along on the densification plan. This doesn't look like it will be the case. At this point, I think the only thing keeping Sprint alive is the tears of their more ardent fans. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
If this is their plan to get to cash flow positive Softbank is looking to sell. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Same problem as always. Sprint has a plan, aggressive rollout goals and then they proceed really, really slow. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
I think trying to keep politics out of any place on the internet this year is going to be like try to catch rain with a butterfly net. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
Democrats have zero chance of taking the house. The Senate maybe, but i dont think they'll do even that. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
I think three is more rational, given the regulation costs the companies face. There is already a hint in the quarterly earnings that local permitting issues have or are going to delay Sprint's densification plans. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
It was a joke. A play on your words. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
-
It probably didn't. But it doesn't happen every quarter either.[emoji14] Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
