The modern exchange system is myopic at best.
John showed wall street that they can add gobs of users. And said they'll over take sprint. He provided action.
Sprint gave just the "opposite" news.
It'll course correct in time!
I assume they will follow CableVision - especially since they already pier off of each other's hot spots.
http://m.deadline.com/2014/08/cablevision-david-dibble-wifi-cto/
I've been ubür critical of the "delays" seen with NV (at least where I live)
But in all honesty the first 6-8 months of nv1.0 was mostly a bunch of testing and please make this work. And mix in some additional months trying to find funding etc....
.... Dan and Sprint did a great job.
I'm strongly thinking about switching back to sprint. It seems 80% of the towers in my area are lte and 800 lte if I'm reading the map correctly. Only change since I left last is 800mhz and one 1900 tower. At that point I'd be lucky to get lte and when I did it was 1-2 mbps down | mostly 3g at sub 500kbps. Currently getting about 20 - 30 mbps down on red. I'll have to stop and check out Yellow again. :-)
Agreed, I was (am) getting the two confused! Not to mention I assume the more new subs, will be salesman to how good of a deal and quality the "new" Sprint has become. Much like the un carrier events.
Thanks
Hmm that sounds to be talking out of both sides of the mouth. Isn't it hard to compete with vzw and att on price yet be cost efficient. I suppose maybe I'm thinking margins and efficiency are linked.
But I hope they do get better plans.