Jump to content

My tower being 1km away


Recommended Posts

Like the title says, my closet tower to my location zip 28214 for me is approximately ~1055m away (per OpenSignal app with GPS on). The signal strength is ridiculously low, usually around -100dbm or more. I get maybe 2 bars on my phone but most of the time it is zero bars and 1xRTT speeds (if I can get that). Watching the debug menu 1x Eng, the phone connects to channel 325 or 350 most of the time. Occasionally it will connect to channel 375 which gives me 4 to 5 bars but then drops back to either 325 or 350.

 

Is this typical signal strength for a tower only 1km away for any of you guys? And if so and yours got upgraded to NV, how much improvement in signal strength did you gain?

 

Also would like to add that when I roam on Cricket, sometimes I connect to a tower of theirs roughly 900m+ away yet get better reception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a bit odd with you being only a little over a half mile away and having such low signal. Typically if the tower is too close, the panel downtilt may not be enough, and the signal would in theory pass right over your home. But in your case, I cannot possibly see that being the case.

 

For me, I have a tower that's even closer to my home ~1700ft, and my signal sits real pretty around -55 to -65dB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea I thought it was odd too. 1km doesn't seem so far away to me. I got Sprint Corporate looking into it. Here in 3-4 days I should hear back from them. I have a feeling something is definitely wrong with that tower.

 

I think I might track this tower down and take a picture of it with my wife's Nikon just to see its exact location.

Edited by Sandman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, don't trust the map locations of OpenSignal maps. It was telling me the tower I connected to was near the center of our small town. But there isn't one there. One is north of town about 2 miles and the other is about 1.5 miles south.

 

The market maps in the sponsor section are very accurate from what I can tell and I located the closes two towers to me. The Charlotte map is in there as well as the Raleigh/Durham market maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to be a sponsor but I am unemployed at the moment and money is tight. I will try to locate it with GPS and apps.

 

Hey I will donate for you tomorrow sometime.

 

PM me your email and ill let Robert know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to be a sponsor but I am unemployed at the moment and money is tight. I will try to locate it with GPS and apps.

 

 

Hey I will donate for you tomorrow sometime.

 

PM me your email and ill let Robert know.

 

Someone already made a donation in his name last night. Sandman, welcome to the Sponsor level. We hope you get back on your feet soon.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to the person who donated for me and thanks to Omega for offering. You guys have really blown my mind and I am almost speechless.

 

This is the best community I have ever been a part of!!

 

Thanks again!!

 

 

EDIT:

 

Looks like the tower that is closest to me is 2.90Km or 1.8 Miles. Being that distance away, should my signal strength be that low to begin with?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the tower that is closest to me is 2.90Km or 1.8 Miles. Being that distance away, should my signal strength be that low to begin with?

 

Absolutely it can be. Signal strength at a distance like that is very dependent on down tilt, or you may be perfectly situated between sectors. If you have line of site to a tower at 1.8 miles you probably would lose only one or two bars on most signal strength indicators. However, if the downtilt was aimed just short of your location, you could drop to as low as one or two bars on your signal strength indicator. Dense foliage and your building type of construction can make a difference too.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got some pictures of the tower from 3 different angles,

 

 

Definitely looks like a legacy Sprint CDMA tower. Thanks for sharing.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me it looks sorta of bare compared to some towers I have seen around my area.

 

Yeah, I suppose. But it's a Sprint only site that is broadcasting only 1900MHz 1x and EVDO. So there is no need for more than what you see. And likely, after Network Vision work is complete, there will be just one combined panel with 800/1900 CDMA and LTE on each sector. For a month or two after NV panels are put up, you will see three panels per sector, but after the legacy is removed, you will be just left with one NV panel per sector. That will look even more lonely than now. :)

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Your referring to the $25.00 a month Infinite Unlimited plan?  I don't see any other plans on there even cheaper than that on their website.  I was looking at the Motorola 2023 Edge fwiw as well for $10.00 a month. 
    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...