Jump to content

West Central Wireless assets acquired by Verizon


iansltx

Recommended Posts

https://www.westcentral.com/west-central-wireless

Effective the 30th, West Central will no longer sign customers up for mobile service or FWA. Sounds like Verizon wanted the spectrum WCW has badly enough that they were willing to pay for it, ignoring the double-handful of customers WCW still has (WCW doesn't have enough spectrum to deploy 5G on its own outside maybe n71 in some areas).

WCW has half of 850 in most of its territory, which is I'm sure why VZW bought in. They also have 10x10 B12 (which is why T-Mobile doesn't in that area), plus some small bits of PCS and AWS in some parts of their service area, plus some 2.5 and 600 in some places. My guess is that VZW will flip the 600, 700, and 2.5, probably to T-Mobile (or maybe AT&T for the 700).

This is notable because T-Mobile roams on WCW. The network isn't fast by any stretch these days, but it covers some areas that T-Mobile doesn't...yet. So T-Mobile will now need to overbuild those areas. On the upside, T-Mobile has plenty of 600 in those areas, and might also get 700...and you routinely see 200-300' towers so cell radii can be 8 miles.

There was a time when one of the companies WCW eventually bought was what I liked to call "Five Bar Wireless"...they had coverage where no one else did, either on TDMA or CDMA. There are still areas where they're the only one with service, though those are harder to find now.

My guess is that it's getting harder and harder to be a mobile provider with less than 100k customers. No economies of scale, rising expenses due to the expectation of 5G, and not enough spectrum to go hard on modern FWA. So best to take the money VZW will give you for the spectrum and sink that into FTTH (WCW is a division of a telephone co-op). Nice thing about FTTH is once the infrastructure is built in that rural of an area, no one will ever overbuild you. And you can build XGS-PON (or upgrade to it), which means FWA can't compete on speed even if they're using a full 200 MHz of C-Band. And you can even sell them backhaul for their mobile service.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://www.androidauthority.com/t-mobile-sales-tactics-employee-interview-3460125/   From the "Uncarrier" to Carrier....
    • Another SCP beta is rolling out now, with some bugfixes as usual but also some fun new options to test: Non-standalone 5G-NR cells can now display Site Notes. This feature works in the same manner as how neighbor cell notes are displayed, requiring a PCI and your device's location. This option is enabled by default. As is the case with neighbor cell notes, you cannot edit NSA site notes directly unless there is an NCI being reported (which I have never seen); it uses the previously recorded standalone log entries. Like neighbor notes, if a cell has been previously logged but there is no note, you will see the distance information only.   Logging cells that are not reporting a valid PLMN is now possible. This option is disabled by default, but if you enable it along with two other options (log sites with missing GCI/NCI and to log sites with missing TAC), you should begin logging most NSA 5G-NR cells. A PCI is needed at a minimum, which is not always reported depending on your device and network factors. ("Sites" will be renamed to "cells" on the Preferences menu in the next update.)   Users can enable an option to display LTE cells above 5G-NR cells in the app if they choose to do so. This option is disabled by default. Should help improve the readability of your screen if you have NSA 5G-NR cells constantly appearing/disappearing. Please give these options a try and let me know if you notice any issues.. thanks!
    • Not yet. We probably won't see one submitted until construction on the new building is substantially complete. 
    • Yes, that is where the site used to be. All the antennas were removed. I hope they add a new site soon. Have any permits been submitted for a new site?
    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...