Jump to content

Will Apple add LTE to the iPhone this year? And will Sprint get it?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 8 January 2012

 

 

Just to broaden our Android horizons here. Will Sprint work with Apple to have all it's LTE frequencies added to an LTE iPhone if it comes out this year which would future proof the phone, or will it be done in incremental stages and later models as its been discussed in other discussions since Sprint won't have all its frequencies in play until Clear begins to deploy its LTE. IMO, regardless of the OEM, I would have it done up front, so as the additional frequencies phones become available the following year, the phone is ready for it. Although this article mentions AT&T and Verizon since their networks are closer to completion, Sprint should show some foresight and make this transition as easy as possible. What does everyone think?

 

 

 

 

Apple is reportedly adding 4G LTE to its iPhone 5 and iPad 3, as the company looks to level the playing field with Android devices.

The Cupertino, Calif.-based company’s CEO, Tim Cook, met with executives at NTT DoCoMo, a Japanese wireless carrier, to talk about when the devices will be available, according to Nikkei Business. The iPad 3 will reportedly hit the carrier in the summer, with the iPhone 5 following it in the fall.

Apple continued its tablets’ early spring release schedule in the U.S. with the iPad 2 this year, and Japan got the device six weeks later. The current reports about the release of the iPad 3 would follow this same model, and analysts believe the iPhone 5 would come next fall, following the shifted release of the iPhone 4S from June to October.

Many consumers were disappointed by the lack of LTE support in the 4S when it launched earlier this year, after several Android devices capable of the 4G speeds had already been released.

Some customers may be upset they can’t purchase an LTE-capable Apple device, but it’s hard to argue the company has made a mistake. The iPhone 4Sis selling at a higher rate than any of its predecessors, and the iPad has continued to power Apple to the top of the list in tablet market share.

Meanwhile, early LTE smartphones have proven to have poor battery life, a bulky design, or both. Apple likely bypassed LTE with its fifth-generation iPhone, choosing instead to put a premium on a slick design and strong battery performance, which has paid off in sales.

Waiting for next year to add LTE capabilities to its devices makes sense for the company. The evolving technology will make it easier and cheaper for the company to incorporate LTE chips in their devices without compromising its designs or the efficiency of its batteries. In addition, Verizon’s LTE network will be serving even more of the country, and AT&T will be at the height of its LTE rollout.

Next year may be the perfect time for Apple to add LTE capabilities to its iPhone and iPad devices, but if it doesn’t, the company will run the risk of truly falling behind the pack.

Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 8 January 2012

 

Right now I have to think this is all speculation. I mean, it is possible that they will, but I HIGHLY doubt they will support all frequencies. One of the carriers will at least get a temporary exclusivity deal and will get the iPhone 5 LTE while the rest just get the iPhone 5. Overall the carrier that can work that deal out will rake in the customers, but I do not think we will see this until at least the back half of 2012 if not at the very end of Q3 2012.

Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 9 January 2012

 

I think Apple will try to support as much as it can with it's initial LTE devise(s). It likes to have a device that is all things to all people, to sell as many devices as possible. But it also likes its Nazi like control scheme and organization, and picking winners and losers. It will be interesting to see it play out. But for Sprint, they MUST find a way to make sure they are on the first wave of LTE devices with Apple. Otherwise, they will never meet their Apple sales obligations and the brand will get tarnished.

Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 9 January 2012

 

I think now that Sprint has released info on the GN and Viper, Apple may be feeling some angst over being left out and this may light a fire under them to get a useable LTE phone out on the next iPhone for Sprint. Although your right. This is Apple and they could have already decided what frequencies they will support this year and add others for the 2013 version.

Posted

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 9 January 2012

 

Apple is so pig-headed and think that everyone needs to adapt to them. That's just my thoughts.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Also a full system update, security update of about 500 or so MB
    • A new 60MB GP System update was waiting when I checked my S24+ tonight.  And bringing it to a November 1 date this time. 
    • Pixel 8a Dec system update over 800 mb is out for locked t mobile.
    • Drove by there and it definitely isn't on the Northlake property. It was very late, so I couldn't see much else though. Did some more sleuthing on GoogleMaps and I suspect it might be this powerline site nearby: Google Maps I will go by there in the next couple of days during the daytime and see if that's the case.
    • Vinegar Hill is getting the Brooklyn Heights treatment now with regard to small cells. I mapped two more small cells in the neighborhood in the past few days so now T-Mobile is up to 8 of them in such a tiny neighborhood. While it's cool they're doing this since it means outdoors you get a consistent 400Mbps+ almost everywhere, it sucks because they're obviously deploying so many of them to make up for their lack of a macro site in the entire neighborhood. Because there isn't a macro, the small cells have a greater coverage area than you see in other neighborhoods and you often connect to them while indoors but coverage and speeds fall off indoors much faster on small cells than on macros in my experience.  Even Dish has better coverage than T-Mobile in Vinegar Hill since they added the site on top of the Extra Space Storage building alongside AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile needs to get in line with their competitors there.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...