Jump to content

Temporary Tower at GMO Site


Recommended Posts

The Sprint equipment looks to be on the new water tower.

 

Sprint is not located on the water tower. Sprint is on a tower near Rock and Lueking.

 

I was trying to say that the Verizon site isn't exactly a GMO because it is a temporary site (like a COW) not that it was a COW. Sorry for the misunderstanding. 

 

 

It's got to be Verizon on the New Water Tower and GMO site. Their LTE signal is weak 2.0 mi from Boyd and MO-21(@ My House). As for Sprint their signal is very Strong at 1.5 mi at the same measuring point (@ My House).

  Here are a couple Pics of The Spectrum Analyzer VIA SDR Radio...

Sprint EV-DO Rock Road Tower:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4YL9JIvAZx7MXBpTERSc25sU3M

Verizon EV-DO (CDMA2000) Boyd St. and MO-21

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4YL9JIvAZx7emFSa2luX3gtQzQ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Here are a couple Pics of The Spectrum Analyzer VIA SDR Radio...

Sprint EV-DO Rock Road Tower:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4YL9JIvAZx7MXBpTERSc25sU3M

 

That is not EV-DO in band class 10.  Sprint deploys only CDMA1X.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
    • https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/05/att-announces-7-monthly-add-on-fee-for-turbo-5g-speeds/ Hopefully we don't ever see T-Mobile do something like this. Based on how I was treated with my Credit Limit, it's definitely not the same company it was before the merger, and it's entirely possible they'd try it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...