Jump to content

Competing repeaters in office


Recommended Posts

My two story office building recently placed Verizon repeaters on the ceilings. I don't know if our telecom department did this or if they're owned by Verizon. This office is in a sprint 3G area but 4G has started appearing around town.

 

If you are within a few feet of a repeater the sprint signal is lost. I know one sprint user who's office is directly under a repeater who has to place his phone in a box lined with tin foil.

 

Will sprint bring repeaters into a building or does the company that owns the building have to pay for that?

 

Can sprint repeaters coexist with Verizon repeaters?

 

Is it possible for them to share repeaters?

 

Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, that's something I have heard of, and really caused by poor design of the repeaters. They probably have signal bleedover, where their PCS signal bleeds into the Sprint PCS signal bands. 

 

The only real fix is to complain to the telecom department as a start, and to Verizon next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, how you should have titled this thread "Offending repeaters."  That would have been marvelous.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have shadowed a guy installing sprint bda and an antenna distribution systems where I work. It amazes me how little they know about the equipment they install. If they over amplify the band they are trying to target it doesn't play nice with other surrounding pcs bands mostly because the receivers in the phones are overwhelmed. None of the installers that are working for a cell company care about what they do to phones on another company. All they test for is the carrier they are doing the install for.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

File a complaint with the FCC, tell them the place is using cell phone jammers. Just act dumb. "they installed these antennas in our ceiling and now my cell phone has no service, what if I need to call 911?"

 

Sent from my Galaxy S3

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have shadowed a guy installing sprint bda and an antenna distribution systems where I work. It amazes me how little they know about the equipment they install. If they over amplify the band they are trying to target it doesn't play nice with other surrounding pcs bands mostly because the receivers in the phones are overwhelmed. None of the installers that are working for a cell company care about what they do to phones on another company. All they test for is the carrier they are doing the install for.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

 

 

This is so true. I find the same with the techs installing NV too. Even the ones installing carriers and configuring the network. I will start having an in depth conversation and they will just get a blank stare. Then they say, "Man, I have no idea. I just do what I've been trained."

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

This is so true. I find the same with the techs installing NV too. Even the ones installing carriers and configuring the network. I will start having an in depth conversation and they will just get a blank stare. Then they say, "Man, I have no idea. I just do what I've been trained."

 

 

 

 

I truly hope that the rf engineering department at whatever cell company is asking for the work to be done at a cell site has written instructions on what knob to turn for the field techs. The only engineering I saw with our bda setup was what tower to point yagi at.

 

Where I work we have had to call Ericsson out a couple times to work on our bda units in a few areas because DC wasn't working. I had already figured out what the problem was (one evdo carrier had an enormous amount of noise) and knew the signal coming from the amp was far to hot. When the guy from Ericsson came out it took me 15 minutes to convince him that my Dura XT was using Sprint DC and not IDEN. He was thrown off by the xxx*xxxxx*xx DC numbers we were using. The rest of the service visit was just as bad. A different guys came out the next day and was a little better and I was able to steer him in the right direction. He also unlocked the g block so now we get Lte!

 

That said all the bad techs seem to have a good tech to call and get advice from. I have also seen some brilliant Ericsson field techs on this board. I just hope they don't get burned out.

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Okay.  I just pulled the Location permission with the app running, and I think it may have closed and immediately reopened.  But I got a notification telling me that "Permission required" while the app itself just said "Waiting for update.." with a spinning circle.  Once I tapped on the "Permission required" notification, it popped up asking for location permission which I then granted. - Trip
    • Thanks! There have been some recent changes to Android permissions requirements that were not documented very well and caused a tremendous amount of problems, especially for users who recently updated to Android 14. Thankfully I have some decent monitoring and diagnostics in place so I was eventually able to figure out what was going on. I'm basically looking for testers to mess around with revoking/denying/granting permissions to make sure the app doesn't crash and the workflow/warnings are reasonably clear. I do know that if you revoke/grant permissions while the app is in use, the app sometimes requires a restart (or at least as swipe out and back in) to get the proper prompting, but it's difficult to control 100% of the scenarios with the amount of background work SCP does with methods that require special permission.
    • So I revoked the permissions before doing the update on my S21FE (Android 12) and when I reopened, it asked me for the permissions, which I granted.  No crashes, all went smoothly.  Is that what you wanted?  If so, I can repeat on a few of my other post-10 devices.  If not, let me know what to do differently. - Trip
    • A new SignalCheck beta release is rolling out now.. this includes several bugfixes, notably issues on Android 10+ devices when Location permission was not granted, and on Android 14 devices when "Allow all the time" Location permission was not granted but the app was configured to launch at device boot. Please test this version by temporarily revoking permissions for SCP and ensure the app does not crash -- it will not work very well due to Android security requirements, but that's the point..
    • Article from October 2022: https://www.reviewjournal.com/business/stadium/allegiant-stadiums-wireless-connectivity-to-get-boost-before-super-bowl-2652035/
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...