Jump to content

NV 3g, do you see better coverage?


Recommended Posts

You're not getting the point at all.

 

If you're trying to be accurate then you should label them by their Band Classes and not the 800/850 reference.

 

How well do you know your 3GPP2 band classes? Do you want me to quiz you? Do you get my point?

 

Now, you are starting to annoy me...

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will any markets see LTE on the SMR band before the June 30, 2013 iDEN sunset date?

 

By then, I'm sure the GS4 and Iphone 5S will be out, or close to it.

Probably only in the FITs. One will be in Montana, the other will be in Louisiana.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Is it though? Didn't Sprint go through "rebranding" in the past seven or so years and now their band is 814-824Mhz?

 

No, not exactly. At its greatest extent, Sprint's rebanded SMR 800 MHz spectrum is 817-824 MHz x 862-869 MHz. In some markets, Sprint has less licensed/usable spectrum than that 14 MHz maximum because of proximity to an international boundary or presence of another ESMR incumbent.

 

See the articles that I wrote last spring:

 

http://s4gru.com/ind...band-operation/

http://s4gru.com/ind...-sids-revealed/

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a supermarket that I frequent. This store is horrible for a Sprint signal until recently. I have to do some more investigation but I usually drop signal as soon as I get 15 feet inside the structure. Two days ago I had a usable strong signal. Even my wifes EVO3D had a usable signal.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I was just in Greenwich, CT doing some shopping and naturally also doing some recording of cell sites in the background on Cellmapper. Specifically I was along Greenwich Ave which is the most dense part of the city. Verizon: Literally didn't work most of the time. Even though their coverage shows the entire city blanketed in 5GUW you'll only be on their nationwide 5G network or LTE if you're anywhere south of Lewis St. Regular 5G (non C-band) didn't work at all. I don't mean it was slow, I mean it didn't pass any data at all. When I opened Instagram it told me "No connection". In a store I was in I even overheard someone asking another shopper if they had service in the store. I immediately knew they were on Verizon. Switching to LTE gave me data although it was slow. In most stores I'd get speeds in the low teens, outside it'd go up to 40Mbps. Above Lewis St. my phone finally connected to n77. On n77 I was seeing ~180Mbps. It seems like the issue isn't backhaul, it's just that Verizon doesn't have any remaining capacity on the LTE side.   AT&T: AT&T was slow but didn't suffer from the same "No data connection" issue that Verizon did. Speeds were in the low teens most of the time and peaked around 50Mbps. My phone hopped between AT&T's nationwide 5G and LTE frequently much like Verizon. Also just like Verizon, north of Lewis St. I suddenly connected to 5G+ which gave me speeds just over 100Mbps. AT&T also at least one small cell along Greenwich Ave for additional capacity and coverage and it's doing wonders for their network in the area. I'd go as far as saying it's probably the only reason they're not in the same situation as Verizon.   T-Mobile: Not to sound like an ad for the company but I was really blown away by T-Mobile's performance here. T-Mobile is collocated on the same towers as Verizon and AT&T in the region but they have an extra site in the steeple a church along Greenwich Ave that they've upgraded with n41. As a result, T-Mobile not only has the strongest signal indoors and outdoors, they also have the fastest speeds by a long shot. Nowhere along the commercial strip did I drop below 500Mbps. Indoors I was seeing over 300Mbps and outdoors I peaked at over 600Mbps. For the sake of testing I switched my phone to LTE and saw speeds of 180Mbps indoors.  
    • This site, along with T-Mobile eNB 307360, don't have B41 live, but do have n41 live. Seems like the latest T-Mobile convert sites don't broadcast B41 at all.
    • Sprint eNB 9493/5784 -> T-Mobile eNB 216213 Located at: 40.61611028489374, -74.01141959254353 Sprint eNB 6786 is converted but not live Located at: 40.647096399275, -73.97984672978991  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...