Jump to content

LTE-A Component Carriers sizing and LTE Band Blocks


Recommended Posts

LTE Advanced (LTE-A) is able to provide faster speeds by using carrier aggregation which combines different LTE Component Carriers (CC). This article gives the basics for how it works.

 
 
As you can see by this image in the article there can be different combinations of contiguous or non-contiguous CCs.
 
 
What I am trying to better understand how is the component carrier size is determined inside a LTE band if a carrier is licensed for some contiguous and non-contiguous blocks within a band. It is very common in a market for a carrier to have different Blocks of an LTE band.
 
For example, lets assume in a city a carrier is licensed for AWS3 Blocks G, H and J. Using the chart below you can see that Blocks G & H are contiguous spectrum and there is a gap between Block H and J.
 
 
So for carrier aggregation would Blocks G & H be considered 1 component carrier (CC) and Block J would be 1 CC?
 
Or would Blocks G, H, and J be considered 1 CC even though there is a gap between H & J?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

L

 

 

Every on air LTE carrier is considered a component carrier if they're aggregated. It does not matter what spectrum it uses or how much bandwidth it encompasses. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every on air LTE carrier is considered a component carrier if they're aggregated. It does not matter what spectrum it uses or how much bandwidth it encompasses. 

 

 

I don't understand what your response is really answering. That seems like a vague statement.

 

Define what you mean when you say "LTE carrier"?

 

Basically the whole point of my post was to help understand the definition of LTE component carrier since in all my searching online I couldn't find out a definition of that in relation to LTE Band Blocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand what your response is really answering. That seems like a vague statement.

 

Define what you mean when you say "LTE carrier"?

 

Basically the whole point of my post was to help understand the definition of LTE component carrier since in all my searching online I couldn't find out a definition of that in relation to LTE Band Blocks.

 

Because you're overthinking this.

 

A component carrier is a LTE carrier that is aggregated with another. Again, what spectrum it uses (AWS1/PCS/CLR850/700 etc etc) does not matter. 

 

Interband carrier aggregation aggregates two LTE carriers from two different frequencies (ie PCS B2 or AWS1- B4) with one being designated by the eNB as the PCC and one as the SCC. 

 

Intraband carrier aggregation can come in two forms.

 

One is contiguous where the spectrum available to use exceeds the 3GPP LTE carrier size bandwidths of 1.4/3/5/10/15/20 MHz such as Sprint who in many places have up to 60 MHz of spectrum available in the 2.5 GHz frequencies. There is no standard to allow 60 MHz LTE carriers so the best way to utilize all the spectrum is to fire up 3 individual 20 MHz LTE carriers and aggregate them. These three LTE carriers are then component carriers when aggregated with each other with one being the primary (PCC) and the other two being the secondary (SCC). 

 

The other is intraband non contiguous where the LTE carriers is within the same band say LTE B2 but there's a gap in licensed frequencies such as being licensed 20 MHz (10x10) of PCS A block and 10 MHz (5x5) of PCS C block. Using carrier aggregation, the two LTE carriers can be aggregated and are called component carriers. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ok, that makes more sense now. The reason I am asking about these questions is so I can figure out how many component carriers exist in my city. Then I can see how much more potential there is for increased speeds in areas once 4CA becomes available in UE and carriers.

 

So based upon my example above since it would be intraband non-contiguous it would be 2 CC.

 

Thank you for explaining things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ok, that makes more sense now. The reason I am asking about these questions is so I can figure out how many component carriers exist in my city. Then I can see how much more potential there is for increased speeds in areas once 4CA becomes available in UE and carriers.

 

So based upon my example above since it would be intraband non-contiguous it would be 2 CC.

 

Thank you for explaining things.

4xca is on the list of plans for the companies. However att is the only one that can do as alot of cities they have 5 band Deployed. VZW could do it when the reframe 850 MHz to B5. Sprint could with a 4th B41 or if they did it with the current 3 carriers then added B25 on to it.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget Sprint is also testing in the field CA 25 which could be used just with on b25 for greater speeds benefiting the edge. Unfortunately, we have not found it yet.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...