Jump to content

Why the iPhone is not manufactured in America, despite Apple being an American company.


pyroscott

Recommended Posts

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 24 January 2012

 

 

According to

"How the U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work" the first iPhone was set to be made in the USA, as most of their early products were, but after carrying a prototype iPhone in his pocket, Steve Jobs noticed dozens of tiny scratches in the plastic screen caused by keys in the pocket, Steve Jobs decided to change the screen to a glass made by Corning. There were no American factories that could ramp up production that fast and cut the glass screen for the iPhone.

China's factories could though. Several weeks later, the iPhones were on their way to retail outlets.

 

The

new york times article states: "It isn’t just that workers are cheaper abroad. Rather, Apple’s executives believe the vast scale of overseas factories as well as the flexibility, diligence and industrial skills of foreign workers have so outpaced their American counterparts that “Made in the U.S.A.” is no longer a viable option for most Apple products.

It is a rather interesting article, and it illustrates that the hunger of American factories is no longer there, compared to the flexibility and willingness of the Chinese factories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 24 January 2012

 

The U.S. moved to being a service economy decades ago and although it needs manufacturing jobs, the Multi-Nationals go where there is a convenient labor pool they can get cheap. The article mentions that Foxconn workers live on site and are at the beck & call of management. They work 12 hour shifts, are paid a dollar/hr and do the same repetitive work that drives them to suicides. The same type of repetitive work that plagued the U.S. auto industry in its infancy. The reason the ChiComs are so responsive is because it boils down that they have a slave labor pool. Once some left wing human rights group makes this their cause and it gets critical support from the public, Apple will be forced to make changes and its current model won't be as competitive as before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 24 January 2012

 

I don't China has near the unemployment/welfare system the U.S. has. You would be very hard pressed to find people willing to live on site here in the US. You would have to pay something in the $30 per hour range to get people to do that. Not $30 every few days...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 25 January 2012

 

China has been switching from an agricultural economy to and industrial base for the past two decades, it's just with so many people it takes a while. If you look what the culture is going through, its just like the U.S. in the early 1900's. In Asia you still have a low education, entry level pool of employees which is perfect for starting a manufacturing base because you can get away with low wages. Here in the U.S., its better but not conducive to manufacturing jobs unless its a high skill segment that's needed. Boeing is a good example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 25 January 2012

 

It is impressive how many engineers they were able to hire to facilitate the manufacturing. No way anyone would be able to hire that kind of quantity in the US, or at least not quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 26 January 2012

 

Here's an article that somewhat summarizes our discussion and Apples attitude toward its labor pool in China. Obviously they are not going to do anything about it unless they have too. They already mention that people care more for the iPhone than the labor conditions of underpaid workers, and as long as its suppliers keep jumping through their hoops then thing will be ok.

Former execs speak out about Apple negligently treating overseas factories, labor conditions

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 26 January 2012

 

Most people will always turn a blind eye towards the suffering of others to save a buck. Nike had all that bad press about sweatshops and bad working conditions and still sits within the leaders for athletic gear. I think unless it comes out that Apple is using stem cells from forced abortions in their products, they won't hurt one bit from bad press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 27 January 2012

 

Here's an article I found on BGR. I guess the NYT article is starting to make the masses aware. Tim Cook says that they really do care about they're supplier partners, they really do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 27 January 2012

 

I'm sure that they care about their public image and their bottom line, but I bet if they could make their retina display cheaper and better if it was made out of actual human retinas, they would find a way to do it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...